Category: AI, Computation, and Technology

  • DAVID SHAPIRO’S 5 YEAR AI PREDICTIONS (CD: Note: I have a clearer picture of the

    DAVID SHAPIRO’S 5 YEAR AI PREDICTIONS
    (CD: Note: I have a clearer picture of the predictable economic and political consequences, with the political being the most risky, but I can’t really comment on the viability of these predictions. That said, even if they’re a bit early they don’t seem far off to me.)
    David’s Predictions:
    1. 2024 AGI THIS YEAR? Given the size and rumors about GPT5 Expect AGI This Year. Nvidia’s foundation agent models – every modality including embodiment, spatial, math. Robots that are already in the uncanny valley.
    The next Gartner hype cycle will be profound and then it will wear off… until the job losses start.
    2. 2025 will see the limited commercial takeoff of AGI.
    3. 2026 Kurzweil thinks ASI … Then we see unemployment creep up. Everyone across the economic and financial spectrum is saying the same thing: these things are going to fundamentally reshape our economic landscape and our relations to job and work.
    4. 2027 About when project Stargate will take off ($100B data centers in the desert), we’ll see the scale effects. We’ll need energy capacity (solar, nuclear). Constraints are (a) data and (b) chips. A lot of data is not useful (good) so we’re going to need new theories of categorizing the quality of data and information.
    5. 2028 All competitors will be online by this time. SO it’s impossible to forecast that future given the rate of evolution of the tech, and the number …
    We are going to see another confluence of multiple techs producing another ‘iphone moment’ so to speak.
    Top contenders: boston dynamics(Robots), openai(Software), nvidia(Hardware/Chips). (CD: IMO tesla)
    https://t.co/150GSV2Y8H


    Source date (UTC): 2024-04-29 21:49:17 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1785063834211762176

  • DAVID SHAPIRO’S 5 YEAR AI PREDICTIONS (CD: Note: I have a clearer picture of the

    DAVID SHAPIRO’S 5 YEAR AI PREDICTIONS
    (CD: Note: I have a clearer picture of the predictable economic and political consequences, with the political being the most risky, but I can’t really comment on the viability of these predictions but even if they’re a bit early they don’t seem far off to me.)
    David’s Predictions:
    1. 2024 AGI THIS YEAR? Given the size and rumors about GPT5 Expect AGI This Year. Nvidia’s foundation agent models – every modality including embodiment, spatial, math. Robots that are already in the uncanny valley.
    The next Gartner hype cycle will be profound and then it will wear off… until the job losses start.
    2. 2025 will see the limited commercial takeoff of AGI.
    3. 2026 Kurzweil thinks ASI … Then we see unemployment creep up. Everyone across the economic and financial spectrum is saying the same thing: these things are going to fundamentally reshape our economic landscape and our relations to job and work.
    4. 2027 About when project Stargate will take off ($100B data centers in the desert), we’ll see the scale effects. We’ll need energy capacity (solar, nuclear). Constraints are (a) data and (b) chips. A lot of data is not useful (good) so we’re going to need new theories of categorizing the quality of data and information.
    5. 2028 All competitors will be online by this time. SO it’s impossible to forecast that future given the rate of evolution of the tech, and the number …
    We are going to see another confluence of multiple techs producing another ‘iphone moment’ so to speak.
    Top contenders: boston dynamics(Robots), openai(Software), nvidia(Hardware/Chips). (CD: IMO tesla)
    https://t.co/150GSV2Y8H


    Source date (UTC): 2024-04-29 21:49:17 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1785062959724552193

  • I’m not sure that most intersexual issues wouldn’t evaporate with the successful

    I’m not sure that most intersexual issues wouldn’t evaporate with the successful development of artificial wombs and eggless-embryogenesis (both of which are in early stages of success). Especially because most birth defects occur in the womb. I can see men building tribes and doing it without having to compromise with women on every little nit. And it turns out that while single mothers are a catastrophe, single dads are exceptional. If I knew what I knew now instead of having three kids I’d have had a dozen. ;).

    Reply addressees: @Womenrising2023 @NoahRevoy


    Source date (UTC): 2024-04-29 16:43:48 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1784986957191249920

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1784983649412067443

  • Very difficult to see that happen. Musk and otehrs are basically trying to acces

    Very difficult to see that happen. Musk and otehrs are basically trying to access the simplest part of the brain which is the motor cortext in a band across the top of the head. This will allow us to manpulate things outside the body just as our brains manipulate muscles within the body. I have a hard time imagining that anything other than vaguely projecting loose renderings of memories is possible. Input? Hard to beat eyes. 😉

    Reply addressees: @partymember55


    Source date (UTC): 2024-04-29 15:58:16 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1784975495429337088

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1784974091553841544

  • Please pay the measley 8 bucks a month to obtain long form posting

    Please pay the measley 8 bucks a month to obtain long form posting.


    Source date (UTC): 2024-04-29 15:13:54 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1784964330909250022

    Reply addressees: @Gyeff0

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1784958432082006444

  • No joke. I’ve tried a few napkin sketches on the cost of javascript worldwide an

    No joke. I’ve tried a few napkin sketches on the cost of javascript worldwide and I can’t come close to a believable number because it so vast. It’s insane. I mean, interpreted languages are fine with current hardware but without the equivalent of data types, a compiler, syntax and logic errors are vast.
    Secondly, add that while the chrome architecture appears to tolerate it, we’re still using virtual doms and the sh—t code required to counter-intuitively manipulate them. That should all be built into the browser, and the syntax nightmare should be over with.
    Third, because of all this we have to write ungodly amounts of test scripts, and maintaining them is a nightmare given the ease and frequency of JS changes.
    I’m all for the browser as a pseudo-operating system. It’s more complex than the OS’s today anyway. I do NOT want to go back to having to ship code on disks or force downloads and reinstalls every time we want to ship a tweak. That’s crazy. But this nonsense has got to stop. And unfortunately we’ve now trained two generations of devs to do sh—t work with sh—-t tools.

    Reply addressees: @DwightExMachina


    Source date (UTC): 2024-04-28 21:08:50 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1784691265277202433

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1784688243868356950

  • Not true any longer. It works just like our brains, it’s just vastly more costly

    Not true any longer. It works just like our brains, it’s just vastly more costly in energy. Within a few decades the hardware will change dramatically, and lower that cost. And the number of parameters and data will increase just like in us. But there isn’t a meaninful difference…


    Source date (UTC): 2024-04-26 14:11:12 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1783861391197126869

    Reply addressees: @Papamuerte37155 @adominguez792 @Nico_Macdonald @HumanProgress @mattwridley

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1783787063315439712

  • RT @curtdoolittle: @Nico_Macdonald @HumanProgress @mattwridley Hmm. Yes of cours

    RT @curtdoolittle: @Nico_Macdonald @HumanProgress @mattwridley Hmm. Yes of course. However, an increasing number, and in the near future a…


    Source date (UTC): 2024-04-26 04:17:29 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1783711974615879814