Category: AI, Computation, and Technology

  • (Why does paypal have to be such sh—?) Never works. Ever. Complete waste of ti

    (Why does paypal have to be such sh—?)

    Never works. Ever. Complete waste of time.


    Source date (UTC): 2013-11-25 10:54:00 UTC

  • (Having fun working with Roman Skaskiw on a bitcoin project. 🙂 )

    (Having fun working with Roman Skaskiw on a bitcoin project. 🙂 )


    Source date (UTC): 2013-11-09 11:12:00 UTC

  • Nerd problem of the day. Mouse won’t work. Most of my keyboard doesn’t seem to w

    Nerd problem of the day.

    Mouse won’t work. Most of my keyboard doesn’t seem to work? But some of it does. Try plugging and unplugging all the different devices… But the Right mouse button still works? Hmmmm….

    There is an Apple Mouse in my backpack in the next office. It’s on. Something is pressing on it. So my computer sees ‘mouse down’ no matter what I do.

    Ten minutes wasted.

    LOL.

    ( Idea for a good prank really. 🙂 )


    Source date (UTC): 2013-11-08 05:52:00 UTC

  • You know, My Mac’s don’t crash very often. A couple times a year. On most of the

    You know, My Mac’s don’t crash very often. A couple times a year.

    On most of them I have Lazarus Form Recovery, so that if I’m writing something, and the browser (frequently) or the machine (rarely) crashes, then I just navigate back to the form, click on the icon, and boom… I’m back in business.

    This time, it crashed Lazarus. Ack. And I’d just about finished a wonderful piece on Austrian Economics in the real world.

    Sigh.


    Source date (UTC): 2013-11-06 16:24:00 UTC

  • (humor) (software) Kirill: “Wait. Do we store the current currency rate when we

    (humor) (software)

    Kirill: “Wait. Do we store the current currency rate when we allocate the resource, or do we store the price?”

    Curt: “We store a ‘value’ or a ‘cost’ as a base currency when the action takes place at a given point in time; but a ‘price’ is a time independent number and currency that we don’t have to store in converted form. The question is whether you’re storing a price or a value.”

    Kirill: “That’s right… So…. this, but…..”

    Curt: “Oh… Yeah. F___K… that means”.

    Kirill: “F____KKKKK!!!!”

    Curt: “There is a reason very few companies do this you know.”

    Kirill: “Yeah. Because it’s so F___KING HARD!!!”

    (laughter)

    Of course Kirill actually remembers all the business rules in the entire application and how to apply them. He wrote the workflow and state engines. He wrote the multi-currency system. And the multi-dimensional organizational system. Now he’s working on the entity types (different types of ‘tasks’ and how to calculate their current and forecast values.)

    So. When he says “F___K” that means something is actually pretty damned hard. lol

    Kirill Latish . Love you man. lol :’)


    Source date (UTC): 2013-11-05 08:05:00 UTC

  • FIRST DEMO (oversing) I recorded a quick little demo for Max Romanenko tonight s

    FIRST DEMO

    (oversing)

    I recorded a quick little demo for Max Romanenko tonight so that he could get a peek at the progress we’ve made the past few weeks. But, just to get an completely neutral view I played the video for V.

    I asked “So? How does it look?”

    Veronika says, “It looks done.”

    I said, “You see all this over here. It’s not done.”

    “Really. It looks done. It looks good. It looks done.”

    Laughing “Well it’s a long way from done.”

    “You know what I think? The next time you complain to me about how slow the project is going I’m going to hit you.”

    “Ok, well I guess that passes the first sniff test then.”

    I ah…., I think lost my right to whine and ask for solace from V.

    LOL


    Source date (UTC): 2013-11-04 15:04:00 UTC

  • (silly-serious) You know, after decades of developing literally THOUSANDS of sof

    (silly-serious)

    You know, after decades of developing literally THOUSANDS of software implementations for customers in everything from core IT, to business applications, to commercial products to silly advertising campaigns, its sort of LIBERATING to make your own software and do it RIGHT.

    Joy. Happy joy-joy feelings from Edgar Friendly.


    Source date (UTC): 2013-11-04 09:25:00 UTC

  • OK. After the crazy party it’s back to serious work today. 🙂 (oversing) Feature

    OK. After the crazy party it’s back to serious work today. 🙂

    (oversing)

    Features on deck:

    – Searching and saving the Workspace

    – The Workspace layout (Which “columns” to view)

    – The Query (what stuff to get)

    – The Filter (what stuff to display)

    – Serving six Workspace models

    – Individual Contributor (my workspace)

    – Team Contributors: (Team Workspace)

    – Ticket Manager (streams in detail)

    – Traffic Manger (multiple small projects in detail)

    – Project Manager / Agile Lead (One Project in detail)

    – Delivery Manager (all projects in any given organization)

    – Deliverables (for small projects, spec work etc.)

    – Creative Briefs

    – Work Orders

    – Statements of Work

    (text templates for simple things, or references to contracts)

    – Requirements “type”

    – Test Cases “type”

    – Ideas “type”

    – Creating and Saving Estimates


    Source date (UTC): 2013-11-01 05:37:00 UTC

  • HEALTHCARE SOFTWARE DISASTER IN THE BILLIONS “The department has been unable to

    http://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/health-and-families/health-news/nhs-pulls-the-plug-on-its-11bn-it-system-2330906.htmlUK HEALTHCARE SOFTWARE DISASTER IN THE BILLIONS

    “The department has been unable to demonstrate what benefits have been delivered from the £2.7bn spent on the project so far,” Margaret Hodge, chair of the PAC, said. “It should now urgently review whether it is worth continuing with the remaining elements of the care-records system. The £4.3bn which the department expects to spend might be better used to buy systems that are proven to work, that are good value for money and which deliver demonstrable benefits to the NHS.” A further £4.4bn was expected to be spent on other areas of the vast IT project.

    The nine-year-old NHS computer project – the biggest civilian IT scheme ever attempted – has been in disarray since it missed its first deadlines in 2007. The project has been beset by changing specifications, technical challenges and clashes with suppliers, which has left it years behind schedule and way over cost.

    Accenture, the largest contractor involved, walked out on contracts worth £2bn in 2006, writing off hundreds of millions of pounds in the process. Months earlier, the US supplier IDX, contracted to provide software in and around London, had also withdrawn from the project, making a $450m (£275m) provision against future losses from the two contracts.

    — LIST OF UK GOVERNMENT IT DISASTERS —

    IT disasters…

    E-Borders (Cancelled June 2011)

    The scheme was originally created to check passenger details against UK police immigration watch lists. The Government tore up supplier Raytheon’s £742m contract on the e-Borders immigration programme in July last year, after delays led the Home Office committee to say it had “no confidence”in the company.

    Department Home Office

    Cost £118m

    ID Cards (Cancelled in January 2011)

    Ministers claimed ID cards would help in the fight against illegal immigration and terrorism by storing details of all UK citizens on a centralised database. The scheme proved unpopular and was scrapped in January this year.

    Department Home Office

    Cost £257m (Source: Home Office)

    Electoral register database (Cancelled in July 2011)

    Plans to create an expensive database of electors were abandoned by the Government last month. The Co-ordinated Online Record of Electors (Core) was legislated for in 2006 and intended to make it easier for political parties to verify the legitimacy of their donors.

    Department Ministry of Justice

    Cost The database, which would have been administered by a new independent public body, would have cost an estimated £11.4m.

    Firecontrol (Cancelled in December 2010)

    Firecontrol aimed to replace 46 fire control centres in England with nine regional sites. The project was scrapped in December 2010 after suffering a series of delays, increased costs and an inadequate IT contract, according to a select committee report.

    Department Communities and Local Government

    Cost £469m (Source: National Audit Office)

    Scope 2 (Cancelled July 2009)

    The project was designed to allow the secure sharing of sensitive intelligence data between relevant departments in government and officials abroad. It was cancelled after reports of technological problems and escalating costs.

    Department Cabinet Office

    Cost £24.4m (Source: Cabinet Office)

    Story of a sick system

    October 2002 The Department for Health launches the NHS National Programme for IT, in a bid to create an electronic care record for patients in England and connect 30,000 general practitioners to 300 hospitals.

    2006 Accenture, the largest contractor, walks out on contracts worth £2bn, writing off hundreds of millions of pounds in the process. Months earlier, the US software supplier, IDX, also quit the project.

    2007 The Government misses its first deadlines as a report by the King’s Fund criticises the Government’s “apparent reluctance to audit and evaluate the programme”.

    2008 A report to the Enfield Primary Care Trust reveals difficulties with the system the previous year saw 63 patients of the Barnet and Chase Farm Hospitals NHS trust have their operations delayed because of missing data. The trust previously found the system had failed to flag up possible child-abuse victims.

    2009 An earlier Public Accounts Committee report notes that the project has provided “little clinical functionality… to date”.


    Source date (UTC): 2013-10-30 03:08:00 UTC

  • THE CONTRIBUTIONS OF COMPUTER SCIENTISTS TO THE REFORMATION IN LIBERTARIAN AND C

    THE CONTRIBUTIONS OF COMPUTER SCIENTISTS TO THE REFORMATION IN LIBERTARIAN AND CONSERVATIVE POLITICAL THOUGHT.

    When I went to Mises for the Austrian Scholars Conference the first time, I was struck dumb; first, by the incredible genius of the economic calculation argument, second by hoppe’s solution to the problem of institutions… But then equally by the failure to see that that BOTH Hayek and Mises were very close but wrong; the failure to grasp the importance of Popper’s contribution; the failure to grasp that no, the calculation issue was not ‘complete’.

    I realized something was wrong with Rothbard fairly quickly. It took me a few years to understand what Mises had done wrong with Praxeology, and only recently how to solve it completely. Hoppe was right about just about everything, but still had both Rothbard’s and Mises’ errors. But even so, he’d managed to get it all right anyway. Which, to me, is an even greater statement of his brilliance. Although, I’m still frustrated by his fascination with Argumentation.

    But it is this emphasis on experience and morality and preference instead of calculation that is everyone’s distraction. ( A topic that needs some reflection and exposition. And so I’ll return to it.)

    COMPUTER SCIENTISTS AND REFORMATION

    So strange. You know, there is this strange anti-computer-science bias in academia. But since the majority of intellectual revolution has come out of Mencius’ application of Austrian thought to conservatism, and my application of Austrian thought to libertarianism, while political science is fascinated by democracy, philosophy still squandering in the artifice of metaphysical pseudo-rationality, and mainstream economics is fascinated by growth and efficiency, and the left (literature) with obscurantism, pseudo-science, equality, diversity, and central control.

    And since, computer science is the only discipline that intersects between theoretical constructs and human interaction directly, I kind of think that, empirically speaking, computer science has more right than math, and certainly more right than economics. And political science and social science don’t even register signal above noise.

    Economics is a process of deduction from aggregation. Computer science is atomistic by its nature. It’s not deduction. It’s calculation. And therein lies an amazing difference in perception. We do not HAVE the economic data to tell us about human behavior at the level of atomicity we do with computers that interact with people on a daily basis. This teaches you about the hubris we must avoid when interacting with human beings.

    Math is platonic. Economics is idealistic. Computer science understands ‘ignorance, bias, incentives, and the limits of calculation’. Which is probably why we solved the political problem and the other groups didn’t.


    Source date (UTC): 2013-10-22 09:33:00 UTC