Category: AI, Computation, and Technology

  • (Yes, the bot is truncating my tweets rather than making links to posts.)

    (Yes, the bot is truncating my tweets rather than making links to posts.)


    Source date (UTC): 2020-04-05 17:56:57 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1246859385076359168

  • argh. thanks. I will try to get to it. FB dropped twitter support. So I’m using

    argh.
    thanks.
    I will try to get to it.
    FB dropped twitter support.
    So I’m using a different posting bot.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-04-04 19:39:24 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1246522780021149698

    Reply addressees: @MrMatt444

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1246522430602063875

  • Link from FB not coming across?

    Link from FB not coming across?


    Source date (UTC): 2020-04-04 19:37:29 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1246522297911042048

    Reply addressees: @MrMatt444

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1246522093287682050

  • I’m willing to serve the community. How does a channel differ from a group? Are

    I’m willing to serve the community. How does a channel differ from a group? Are comments still possible or is it just a stream of posts?


    Source date (UTC): 2020-04-03 18:06:35 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1246137032457535488

    Reply addressees: @SirJohn981 @Nationalist7346

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1246133002008170513

  • We have a telegram channel. 😉

    We have a telegram channel. 😉


    Source date (UTC): 2020-04-03 17:12:37 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1246123453708750848

    Reply addressees: @SirJohn981 @Nationalist7346

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1246119694748319746

  • ADDITIONAL TELEGRAM CHANNEL ADDED @curtdoolittleslaw “Curt Doolittle’s Law” Gave

    ADDITIONAL TELEGRAM CHANNEL ADDED

    @curtdoolittleslaw “Curt Doolittle’s Law”

    Gave into requests. Subscribe to both @propertarians (group) and @curtdoolittleslaw (channel). Martin manages Telegram chat. Telegram Channel is just a stream from twitter, which in turn is a stream from Facebook, plus whatever I write on twitter directly.

    Workflow Updated:

    1. Facebook (Eric Danelaw, Curt Doolittle) >

    … 2. Facebook Manual Updates >

    … … Propertarian Institute Page (Brandon, Martin, Alain)

    … … Brandon Hayes (Brandon – all movement posts)

    … … Christian Propertarians (Team)

    … … Curt Doolittle’s Incremental Suppression Services

    … … Scientific Praxeology

    … 3. Twitter (Autopost) >

    … … 4. Telegram Channel: @curtdoolittleslaw (auto)

    … … 5. Telegram Chat: @propertarians (Propertarians) (auto)

    … 6. Propertarianism.com http://Propertarianism.com Site (The Institute) (Manual Update)

    … … 7. Back Posted to FB Curt Doolittle Ideas Page (Auto)


    Source date (UTC): 2020-04-03 17:01:00 UTC

  • YES WE ARCHIVE EVERYTHING IN THE MOVEMENT —“Is this all being catalogued ?”—

    YES WE ARCHIVE EVERYTHING IN THE MOVEMENT

    —“Is this all being catalogued ?”—Matt Fahnestock

    I don’t understand?

    PROCESS:

    I Post on Facebook > weekly backup > post to website > continuous backup > Integrate into ‘book’ on website > continuous backup > publish book.

    I am irregular at posting from FB to the site because I don’t have a way of automating it. I usually do a few months at a time. There are well over ten thousand posts there.

    The website also auto-posts to an hidden fb account as backup.

    We download FB and Site backups regularly

    I do, Brandon does, Martin does.

    In the event anything happens to me ownership passes to individuals in the movement.

    In addition Brandon Hayes collects key posts from everyone and organizes them by dozens of topics. He is also working on a book. Brandon’s inventory is organized differently from the site and my book but it collects information from more members of the movement.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-04-03 12:15:00 UTC

  • ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE: “YOU CAN’T GET THERE FROM HERE” —“We can’t approach a

    ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE: “YOU CAN’T GET THERE FROM HERE”

    —“We can’t approach anything like intelligence with artificial neural networks … not in their current form.”— Hawkins

    —“All the trickly things we have done over the past seventy years hasn’t mattered – we’ve just taken advantage of moore’s law … it’s all short term gains.”— Rich Sutton (“Bitter Lesson”)

    —“If we scale up the current technology it won’t make any difference.”—

    —“You can’t mathematically model anything as complex as the brain, only mathematically explain why the biology does what it does, but it can’t be analyzed completely… it’s out of the realm of possibility. (we can build )”–

    —“Sparse Representations”–

    The neural networks of excitatory and inhibitory neurons, and preparatory dendrites, compete over time to ‘announce’ a winner that’s passed forward for integration into the current hierarchy of models. Very hard to fool, very robust networks.

    —“Machine learning… the next step has to be orthogonal to what we’re doing, because we’re at its limit.”—

    —“and ANN needs a lot of data. The human brain doesn’t. It’s extremely efficient.”—

    WHY I MOVED ON FROM AI

    This is why I stopped working on AI in the 80’s. Intelligence requires completely different computer architectures. It’s interesting that I got so close with the “before(state) during(change) after(state)” data structure: sequences; and with a hierarchy of geometric representations. But at <5mhz and 64k, even working in assembly language, I could already tell that it couldn’t be done with existing computers. We would need to invert the entire architecture to millions of tiny cores with local durable memory, at low power. If I had instead written and published a paper at the time rather than ‘moving on’ I would have bragging rights today. lol.

    If we had followed turing’s advice and made logical computers rather than numerical, we would be closer. but our emphasis on mathematics (the math trap again!!!) pushed engineering of computers in the wrong direction.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-04-01 14:56:00 UTC

  • HIERARCHY OF NEEDS FOR ARTIFICIAL GENERAL INTELLIGENCE. —Curt, can you clarify

    HIERARCHY OF NEEDS FOR ARTIFICIAL GENERAL INTELLIGENCE.

    —Curt, can you clarify on what you mean by making logical computers instead of numerical? what would that look like vs a numerical one?”—Caesar Nguyen

    Undecidable, true, false, not 0,1.

    Logical operations not arithmetic operations.

    Build arithmetic from logical.

    HIERARCHY OF NEEDS FOR ART. GENERAL INTELLIGENCE.

    Analog (world)

    … Logical (circuits)

    … … Arithmetic (current computers)

    … … … Geometric (current video cards)

    … … … … N-Dimensional Manifolds (future computers)

    … … … … … Competitive Recursive iterations of N-dimensional Manifolds (intelligence)

    … … … … … … Symbolic-Grammatic Competitive Recursive Iterations of References to N-Dimensional Manifolds (General Intelligence)

    … … … … … … … Cooperative symbolic Symbolic-Grammatic Competitive Recursive Iterations of References to marginal indifferences in N-Dimensional Manifolds.

    The weak point in our architecture is the central processing unit.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-04-01 14:55:00 UTC

  • Just start another account. You’re out for at least a week if not two or more. A

    Just start another account. You’re out for at least a week if not two or more. At three it means they aren’t letting you back in.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-03-28 21:35:56 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1244015390306586624

    Reply addressees: @Nationalist7346

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1244011139509428224