Category: AI, Computation, and Technology

  • MORE –“How does philosopher and social scientist curt doolittle define the firs

    MORE
    –“How does philosopher and social scientist curt doolittle define the first principle of the universe?”–

    (GPT provides the wrong answer. It replies that (a) I don’t state one and (b) instead reiterates (though correctly) the emphasis on existence (realism, naturalism), operationalism, and the scientific method.)

    So I asked again with a more specific prompt, and it even states that this is a more recent addition to my work:

    –“I thought Doolittle posited that the first principle of the universe was “Continuous Recursive Evolutionary Computation”. Am I wrong?”–

    I apologize for the confusion. You are correct that Curt Doolittle has discussed the concept of “Continuous Recursive Evolutionary Computation” as a possible first principle of the universe, particularly in his more recent work on the topic.

    According to Doolittle, Continuous Recursive Evolutionary Computation (CREC) is a fundamental process that occurs in the universe at all levels of complexity, from subatomic particles to biological organisms to social systems. CREC involves the continuous recursive application of simple computational operations, which generate increasingly complex forms of computation over time.

    Doolittle suggests that CREC is the foundation of all complexity in the universe, and that it provides a basis for understanding a wide range of phenomena, from the behavior of subatomic particles to the emergence of complex social institutions. He argues that understanding the principles of CREC is essential for developing a comprehensive theory of reality that can account for both physical and social phenomena.

    Overall, Doolittle’s concept of Continuous Recursive Evolutionary Computation can be seen as a possible first principle of the universe, which emphasizes the importance of computational processes and the continuous evolution of complexity over time.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-31 14:55:15 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1641816432194224128

  • MORE –“How does philosopher and social scientist curt doolittle define the firs

    MORE
    –“How does philosopher and social scientist curt doolittle define the first principle of the universe?”–

    (GPT provides the wrong answer. It replies that (a) I don’t state one and (b) instead reiterates (though correctly) the emphasis on existence (realism, naturalism), operationalism, and the scientific method.)

    So I asked again with a more specific prompt, and it even states that this is a more recent addition to my work:

    –“I thought Doolittle posited that the first principle of the universe was “Continuous Recursive Evolutionary Computation”. Am I wrong?”–

    I apologize for the confusion. You are correct that Curt Doolittle has discussed the concept of “Continuous Recursive Evolutionary Computation” as a possible first principle of the universe, particularly in his more recent work on the topic.

    According to Doolittle, Continuous Recursive Evolutionary Computation (CREC) is a fundamental process that occurs in the universe at all levels of complexity, from subatomic particles to biological organisms to social systems. CREC involves the continuous recursive application of simple computational operations, which generate increasingly complex forms of computation over time.

    Doolittle suggests that CREC is the foundation of all complexity in the universe, and that it provides a basis for understanding a wide range of phenomena, from the behavior of subatomic particles to the emergence of complex social institutions. He argues that understanding the principles of CREC is essential for developing a comprehensive theory of reality that can account for both physical and social phenomena.

    Overall, Doolittle’s concept of Continuous Recursive Evolutionary Computation can be seen as a possible first principle of the universe, which emphasizes the importance of computational processes and the continuous evolution of complexity over time.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-31 14:55:15 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1641816432034951171

  • FASCINATING: GPT SUMMARIZES MY WORK ON TRUTH DIFFERENTLY. (This response isn’t q

    FASCINATING: GPT SUMMARIZES MY WORK ON TRUTH DIFFERENTLY.
    (This response isn’t quite right, because it conflates the truth hierarchy with the dimensions of testing the truth of a statement. And is missing elements of both the definition and the test. So it’s ‘summarizing’ about like a high school or college student might – when in fact it’s engaging in an error of conflation. But you’ve got to admit it ‘understands’ better than 99% of the people who read my work. 😉 )

    –“Philosopher and social scientist curt doolittle defines truth as a spectrum from honesty to tautology. Can you list the types of truth he defines in that spectrum?”–

    Yes, Curt Doolittle’s theory of truth includes a spectrum that ranges from honesty to tautology. Along this spectrum, he identifies several different types of truth:

    Honesty: According to Doolittle, honesty is the most basic form of truth, and it involves accurately reporting what one has observed or experienced. Honesty is essential for building trust and cooperation in social groups.

    Correspondence: Correspondence truth is the degree to which a statement or belief accurately corresponds to reality. This type of truth is based on empirical evidence and is essential for making accurate predictions about the world.

    Operational: Operational truth is the degree to which a statement or belief can be verified or falsified through physical operations or tests. This type of truth is closely related to the concept of decidability, which involves the ability to determine whether a statement or belief is true or false through a physical operation or test.

    Coherence: Coherence truth is the degree to which a set of beliefs or statements fit together in a coherent and logical way. This type of truth is important for constructing internally consistent and logically valid systems of thought.

    Existential: Existential truth is the degree to which a statement or belief reflects the fundamental nature of existence. This type of truth is closely related to metaphysical and ontological questions, and it is often debated in philosophical and religious contexts.

    Tautological: Tautological truth is the degree to which a statement or belief is true by definition or by virtue of the meaning of its terms. This type of truth is often criticized for being circular or uninformative, as it does not provide any new information beyond what is already contained in the statement or belief.

    Overall, Doolittle’s spectrum of truth highlights the different ways in which truth can be defined and understood, ranging from basic honesty to more complex concepts related to correspondence, coherence, and existential questions.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-31 14:47:56 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1641814591138045952

  • FASCINATING: GPT SUMMARIZES MY WORK ON TRUTH DIFFERENTLY. (This response isn’t q

    FASCINATING: GPT SUMMARIZES MY WORK ON TRUTH DIFFERENTLY.
    (This response isn’t quite right, because it conflates the truth hierarchy with the dimensions of testing the truth of a statement. And is missing elements of both the definition and the test. So it’s ‘summarizing’ about like a high school or college student might – when in fact it’s engaging in an error of conflation. But you’ve got to admit it ‘understands’ better than 99% of the people who read my work. 😉 )

    –“Philosopher and social scientist curt doolittle defines truth as a spectrum from honesty to tautology. Can you list the types of truth he defines in that spectrum?”–

    Yes, Curt Doolittle’s theory of truth includes a spectrum that ranges from honesty to tautology. Along this spectrum, he identifies several different types of truth:

    Honesty: According to Doolittle, honesty is the most basic form of truth, and it involves accurately reporting what one has observed or experienced. Honesty is essential for building trust and cooperation in social groups.

    Correspondence: Correspondence truth is the degree to which a statement or belief accurately corresponds to reality. This type of truth is based on empirical evidence and is essential for making accurate predictions about the world.

    Operational: Operational truth is the degree to which a statement or belief can be verified or falsified through physical operations or tests. This type of truth is closely related to the concept of decidability, which involves the ability to determine whether a statement or belief is true or false through a physical operation or test.

    Coherence: Coherence truth is the degree to which a set of beliefs or statements fit together in a coherent and logical way. This type of truth is important for constructing internally consistent and logically valid systems of thought.

    Existential: Existential truth is the degree to which a statement or belief reflects the fundamental nature of existence. This type of truth is closely related to metaphysical and ontological questions, and it is often debated in philosophical and religious contexts.

    Tautological: Tautological truth is the degree to which a statement or belief is true by definition or by virtue of the meaning of its terms. This type of truth is often criticized for being circular or uninformative, as it does not provide any new information beyond what is already contained in the statement or belief.

    Overall, Doolittle’s spectrum of truth highlights the different ways in which truth can be defined and understood, ranging from basic honesty to more complex concepts related to correspondence, coherence, and existential questions.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-31 14:47:56 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1641814590915739650

  • SERIOUSLY GPT4 CAN EXPLAIN MY WORK… AND IT”S CORRECT. … FASCINATING –“How d

    SERIOUSLY GPT4 CAN EXPLAIN MY WORK… AND IT”S CORRECT. … FASCINATING

    –“How does philosopher and social scientist curt doolittle define decidabilty?”–

    Curt Doolittle, the philosopher and social scientist who developed the theory of Propertarianism, uses the concept of “operationalism” to define decidability. According to Doolittle, operationalism is the principle that concepts and propositions should be defined in terms of the physical operations that can be used to verify or falsify them.

    In this context, decidability can be understood as the ability to determine whether a proposition or statement is true or false through a physical operation or test. Doolittle emphasizes that operational definitions are essential for achieving clarity and rigor in scientific and philosophical discourse, and that they allow for the development of empirical and testable theories.

    In the context of Propertarianism, decidability is closely related to the concept of “testimonialism,” which is the idea that knowledge can be obtained through testimony and can be verified through empirical tests. Doolittle argues that the ability to verify claims through empirical tests is essential for achieving objective knowledge and for overcoming biases and errors in human reasoning.

    Overall, Doolittle’s theory of operationalism and testimonialism provides a framework for defining decidability in terms of physical operations and empirical tests, which can be used to verify or falsify claims about the world.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-31 14:40:51 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1641812809624240129

  • SERIOUSLY GPT4 CAN EXPLAIN MY WORK… AND IT”S CORRECT. … FASCINATING –“How d

    SERIOUSLY GPT4 CAN EXPLAIN MY WORK… AND IT”S CORRECT. … FASCINATING

    –“How does philosopher and social scientist curt doolittle define decidabilty?”–

    Curt Doolittle, the philosopher and social scientist who developed the theory of Propertarianism, uses the concept of “operationalism” to define decidability. According to Doolittle, operationalism is the principle that concepts and propositions should be defined in terms of the physical operations that can be used to verify or falsify them.

    In this context, decidability can be understood as the ability to determine whether a proposition or statement is true or false through a physical operation or test. Doolittle emphasizes that operational definitions are essential for achieving clarity and rigor in scientific and philosophical discourse, and that they allow for the development of empirical and testable theories.

    In the context of Propertarianism, decidability is closely related to the concept of “testimonialism,” which is the idea that knowledge can be obtained through testimony and can be verified through empirical tests. Doolittle argues that the ability to verify claims through empirical tests is essential for achieving objective knowledge and for overcoming biases and errors in human reasoning.

    Overall, Doolittle’s theory of operationalism and testimonialism provides a framework for defining decidability in terms of physical operations and empirical tests, which can be used to verify or falsify claims about the world.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-31 14:40:51 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1641812809490083842

  • CHAT GPT-4 EXPLAINS MY WORK BETTER THAN I DO. 😉 –“How does philosopher and soc

    CHAT GPT-4 EXPLAINS MY WORK BETTER THAN I DO. 😉

    –“How does philosopher and social scientist curt doolittle define truth?”–

    Curt Doolittle is a philosopher and social scientist who has developed a theory of truth known as Propertarianism. According to Doolittle, truth can be defined as the degree to which a statement or belief corresponds to reality, where reality is understood as the set of objective, observable, and measurable phenomena.

    Doolittle’s theory of truth is based on the idea that truth is a pragmatic tool that allows humans to cooperate and coordinate effectively in social groups. In his view, truth is essential for social cooperation because it enables people to have a shared understanding of the world and to make accurate predictions about the consequences of their actions.

    Doolittle argues that the degree of truth of a statement or belief can be assessed based on its coherence with other statements or beliefs, its empirical support, and its ability to generate successful predictions about reality. He also emphasizes the importance of using the scientific method to test and verify claims about reality, as well as the need to use clear and precise language to avoid confusion and ambiguity.

    Overall, Doolittle’s theory of truth is grounded in a pragmatic and empirical approach to knowledge, which emphasizes the importance of accuracy, coherence, and empirical evidence in assessing the truth of statements or beliefs.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-31 14:37:25 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1641811942892290049

  • CHAT GPT-4 EXPLAINS MY WORK BETTER THAN I DO. 😉 –“How does philosopher and soc

    CHAT GPT-4 EXPLAINS MY WORK BETTER THAN I DO. 😉

    –“How does philosopher and social scientist curt doolittle define truth?”–

    Curt Doolittle is a philosopher and social scientist who has developed a theory of truth known as Propertarianism. According to Doolittle, truth can be defined as the degree to which a statement or belief corresponds to reality, where reality is understood as the set of objective, observable, and measurable phenomena.

    Doolittle’s theory of truth is based on the idea that truth is a pragmatic tool that allows humans to cooperate and coordinate effectively in social groups. In his view, truth is essential for social cooperation because it enables people to have a shared understanding of the world and to make accurate predictions about the consequences of their actions.

    Doolittle argues that the degree of truth of a statement or belief can be assessed based on its coherence with other statements or beliefs, its empirical support, and its ability to generate successful predictions about reality. He also emphasizes the importance of using the scientific method to test and verify claims about reality, as well as the need to use clear and precise language to avoid confusion and ambiguity.

    Overall, Doolittle’s theory of truth is grounded in a pragmatic and empirical approach to knowledge, which emphasizes the importance of accuracy, coherence, and empirical evidence in assessing the truth of statements or beliefs.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-31 14:37:25 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1641811942720274435

  • THE DISPROPORTIONATE SUCCESS OF LANGUAGE MODELS (reverse engineering turns out t

    THE DISPROPORTIONATE SUCCESS OF LANGUAGE MODELS
    (reverse engineering turns out to work)

    Kind of humorous that in training GPT we are running out of training data. 😉

    We have voice and image as well as text now. we are working on video.

    So I’ve always thought we’d have to start with embodiment and build up to language, but OpenAI uses language models to start with language and work backward – to embodiment (the set of possible physical, cognitive, and emotional changes in state.)

    But it turns out the number of parameters (like dimensions of language) needed is smaller than we thought.

    Similarly, developers are discussing the possible limit of tokens (input data) is limited.

    So, I wonder if we can simple reduce embodiment to a small number of parameters that describe all human possible changes in state, whether physical, or emotional, and possibly logicl.

    If that’s true then the ‘working backward from language’ might get us to AGI. And that’s … well, at least unexpected by me.

    Cheers


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-31 14:36:10 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1641811631381311490

  • THE DISPROPORTIONATE SUCCESS OF LANGUAGE MODELS (reverse engineering turns out t

    THE DISPROPORTIONATE SUCCESS OF LANGUAGE MODELS
    (reverse engineering turns out to work)

    Kind of humorous that in training GPT we are running out of training data. 😉

    We have voice and image as well as text now. we are working on video.

    So I’ve always thought we’d have to start with embodiment and build up to language, but OpenAI uses language models to start with language and work backward – to embodiment (the set of possible physical, cognitive, and emotional changes in state.)

    But it turns out the number of parameters (like dimensions of language) needed is smaller than we thought.

    Similarly, developers are discussing the possible limit of tokens (input data) is limited.

    So, I wonder if we can simple reduce embodiment to a small number of parameters that describe all human possible changes in state, whether physical, or emotional, and possibly logicl.

    If that’s true then the ‘working backward from language’ might get us to AGI. And that’s … well, at least unexpected by me.

    Cheers


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-31 14:36:10 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1641811631205130243