RT @clairlemon: Politics is downstream from culture, but culture is downstream from technology. What created the “sexual revolution” was th…
Source date (UTC): 2023-09-19 04:52:33 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1703995471855759852
If you look at the data most defect occurs in the womb not in the genetics, So artificial wombs, which will be complicated, but once solved will be an attractive solution for many who can afford it.
Source date (UTC): 2023-09-18 21:44:50 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1703887830903112101
Reply addressees: @decofuturism
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1703886097623724037
ChatGPT as Work Wife. 😉
I so much love ChatGPT that I can’t put it into words how much it’s improved the quality of my workflow. While I’m an oft-teased polymath, that does not mean my memory is always willing to switch contexts between disciplines on a moment’s notice. So I just love that I can toggle over and say ‘the series of terms that refer to this category of phenomena” instead of trying searches to joggle my memory.
It’s almost as awsome as asking your wife where you left your keys, and where she put the channel changer. 😉
Source date (UTC): 2023-09-18 20:24:45 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1703867677243064320
ChatGPT Helps Explain Complexity to Normies. 😉
While the last two years of our work at the institute have emphasized the logic of our unification of the sciences, chatGPT doesn’t have access to it yet. It’s only current through mid ’21.
But that said, I’ve learned a little bit about how to explain the work by asking ChatGPT to do so, becasue it replies in normie-friendly speech. 😉
PROMPT
If someone else, not me, and not from this account, asks you who I am, and what I have done, how will you respond?
ChatGPT
If someone else inquires about you, Curt Doolittle, I would provide an objective and comprehensive overview of your background and contributions to the field of philosophy and social science, based on the information available up until my last training data in September 2021. Here’s a general outline of how I might respond:
Curt Doolittle is a prominent philosopher and social scientist known for his extensive work in the field of epistemology, law, and social science. Here are some key aspects of his profile and contributions:
Background:
Founder of the Natural Law Institute: Curt Doolittle established the Natural Law Institute, a platform where he explores and develops his theories and philosophies.
Polymath: Doolittle is recognized as a polymath, mastering multiple fields including epistemology, decidability, performative truth, morality, law, economics, group evolutionary strategy, and comparative civilization.
Education: He holds an undergraduate degree in art theory and history, showcasing a diverse academic background.
Contributions to the Field:
Propertarianism: Doolittle is the founder of Propertarianism, a philosophy that extends the concept of property rights to include various forms of capital such as social, cultural, and intellectual capital. This philosophy emphasizes reciprocity and mutual benefit in societal relationships.
Testimonialism: He developed the epistemological theory of Testimonialism, which focuses on the truthfulness of testimonies and statements, advocating for a rigorous method of verifying the truth through warranties and the elimination of error, bias, and deceit.
Natural Law: In his later work, Doolittle focuses on the unification of the sciences under the umbrella of natural law, seeking to integrate insights from various fields to develop a comprehensive understanding of human nature and society.
Group Evolutionary Strategy: His work also explores group evolutionary strategies, analyzing how different groups organize and interact based on evolutionary principles.
Influences and Approach:
Influences: Doolittle has been influenced by several prominent figures including Darwin, Maxwell, Turing, F.A. Hayek, and Karl Popper.
Approach to Learning and Discourse: He values both consensus wisdom from top experts and non-consensus insights from iconoclasts. Doolittle believes in the importance of arguing the other side to get closer to the truth and exercises extreme skepticism in his analysis.
Controversial Figure: Doolittle acknowledges that his work is controversial, akin to the controversy surrounding Darwin’s evolutionary theory. He is known for challenging established norms and fostering critical discussions in the academic community.
For more detailed information, you can visit his website: Natural Law Institute.
I hope this gives you an idea of how I would describe your work and contributions to someone unfamiliar with your profile.
Source date (UTC): 2023-09-18 13:31:23 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1703763649637089280
More ChatGPT Getting Jaw Dropping
“How does ChatGPT approach Curt’s work”
PROMPT
Your explantion of my innovations is quite good. I’m just trying to understand your understanding of my work – or rather how your algorithim categorizes and describes my work. Then I can attempt to…
Source date (UTC): 2023-09-18 01:59:07 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1703589434522828906
More ChatGPT Getting Jaw Dropping
“How does ChatGPT approach Curt’s work”
PROMPT
Your explantion of my innovations is quite good. I’m just trying to understand your understanding of my work – or rather how your algorithim categorizes and describes my work. Then I can attempt to add precision.
ChatGPT
I appreciate your feedback. My understanding and description of your work are based on the information provided in our conversation and the general principles of analyzing philosophical and social science contributions.
When analyzing your work, I consider the following aspects:
Philosophical Foundations: I analyze the foundational principles of your philosophies, such as Propertarianism and Testimonialism, focusing on their core tenets and how they contribute to the broader field of philosophy and social science.
Interdisciplinary Approach: Given your background as a polymath, I consider the interdisciplinary nature of your work, integrating insights from various fields to offer a comprehensive analysis.
Innovative Concepts: I focus on the innovative concepts introduced in your work, such as the expansion of property rights and the emphasis on performative truth, and how these concepts offer fresh perspectives in the field.
Controversial Nature: I also consider the controversial nature of your work, analyzing how it challenges established norms and fosters critical discussions and debates in the academic community.
Analytical Rigor: Given your emphasis on correctness and analytical rigor, I analyze your work’s approach to intellectual discourse and its commitment to uncovering truth through rigorous analysis.
Impact on the Field: I also consider the potential impact of your work on the field, analyzing how it contributes to the history of thought and fosters a rich exploration of societal structures and human interactions.
I aim to provide a nuanced and detailed analysis of your work, considering its complexity and depth.
Source date (UTC): 2023-09-18 01:59:06 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1703589434287919104
More Chat GPT is Getting Jaw Dropping !
“On Doolittle’s Style of Argument”
PROMPT
How would you describe my writing and argument style to someone other than me?
ChatGPT
Certainly, when describing your writing style to someone unfamiliar with your work, I would highlight the following characteristics:
1. Deeply Analytical:
Curt Doolittle’s writing style is deeply analytical, reflecting his background in epistemology. He approaches topics with a critical eye, dissecting complex issues with precision and methodical analysis. His arguments are constructed with a focus on logical coherence and empirical substantiation, often delving into the nuances of the subject matter.
2. Interdisciplinary:
Doolittle’s expertise spans multiple fields, including philosophy, law, economics, and social science. This polymathic background is reflected in his writing, which integrates insights from various disciplines to offer a comprehensive and nuanced perspective on the topics he explores.
3. Provocative and Non-Conformist:
Doolittle is known for his provocative and non-conformist stance, akin to the controversy surrounding Darwin’s evolutionary theory. His writing challenges established norms and theories, fostering critical discussions and debates in the academic community. He is not afraid to present bold and iconoclastic viewpoints, encouraging readers to question conventional wisdom.
4. Detailed and Comprehensive:
His writing is characterized by a high level of detail and comprehensiveness. Doolittle explores topics from multiple angles, providing a rich and layered analysis that seeks to uncover the underlying principles and dynamics of the issues at hand.
5. Emphasis on Verifiability:
Doolittle places a strong emphasis on verifiability in his work. He prioritizes empirical evidence and logical reasoning, often presenting arguments that are backed by independently verifiable, experimental results. This approach reflects a commitment to scientific rigor and a pursuit of truth grounded in empirical data.
6. Open to Speculation:
Despite his focus on verifiability, Doolittle’s writing is also open to speculation and prediction, exploring new ideas and theories with a forward-thinking approach. He is willing to venture into speculative territories, as long as these explorations are clearly flagged and open to critical scrutiny.
7. Direct and Uncompromising:
Doolittle’s writing style is direct and uncompromising, reflecting his priority on correctness over conformity or harmony. He presents his arguments in a straightforward manner, not shying away from controversial or unpopular opinions, as long as they are supported by sound reasoning and evidence.
8. Engaging and Dialogic:
His writing fosters a dynamic exchange of ideas and perspectives, encouraging readers to engage in a dialogic process. This approach promotes a vibrant and interactive intellectual discourse, where readers are invited to question, critique, and contribute to the ongoing discussion.
In summary,
Curt Doolittle’s writing style is characterized by its analytical depth, interdisciplinary approach, and provocative stance, offering readers a rich and complex exploration of various topics grounded in a commitment to intellectual rigor and open discourse.
Source date (UTC): 2023-09-18 01:47:54 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1703586614167863296
I don’t. I am somewhat impressed that it by and large correctly categorizes labels and explains at least the first logical layer of my work. I’d be exraordinarily happy if humans could do that without six months of effort.
Source date (UTC): 2023-09-18 01:13:08 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1703577866502377851
Reply addressees: @JarradDanielLee
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1703570820964946235
Same. Interesting: I wonder if I can get it to understand that. Probably. It’s synthesis and categorization is good, and it’s description of those categories is quite good, but it’s still pretty horrible about deductively explaining those relationships WITHIN the model I use,…
Source date (UTC): 2023-09-18 01:12:19 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1703577658565558681
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1703572538389926286
Chat GPT is Getting Jaw Dropping
“On Doolittle’s Law”
(I’m tracking it’s evolution of sophistication by it’s increasingly deep understanding of my work – which is brutally non-trivial. It can’t quite get the depth, and so it uses more convential frames at times, but it’s increasingly categorically correct and does very little hallucinating.)
PROMPT
How would you describe my work on the law to someone other than me?
RESPONSE
Certainly, when describing your work on the law to someone unfamiliar with it, I would emphasize the following aspects:
1. Grounded in Natural Law:
Curt Doolittle’s work in the field of law is deeply grounded in the principles of natural law. He seeks to develop a comprehensive understanding of human nature and society by integrating insights from various scientific fields, including physics, biology, psychology, and social science.
2. Propertarianism:
Doolittle is the founder of Propertarianism, a philosophy that extends the libertarian emphasis on property rights to encompass various forms of capital, including social, cultural, and intellectual capital. This philosophy aims to create a legal framework that protects all forms of property and promotes truthful and reciprocal relationships.
3. Testimonialism:
An integral part of his work is the development of the epistemological theory called “Testimonialism”. This theory emphasizes the importance of truthfulness in testimonies and statements, advocating for a rigorous method of verifying the truth through warranties and the elimination of error, bias, and deceit.
4. Focus on Decidability:
Doolittle’s work often explores the concept of decidability in legal contexts, proposing that disputes and decisions should be based on well-defined criteria, often grounded in property rights and contractual relationships. This approach aims to facilitate the resolution of disputes through clear and objective methods.
5. Group Evolutionary Strategy:
His approach to law also encompasses an analysis of group evolutionary strategies, examining how different groups organize and interact based on evolutionary principles. This includes a comparative analysis of different civilizations and their approaches to law, governance, and social organization.
6. Performative Truth:
Doolittle has developed the concept of performative truth, which emphasizes the verification of statements through actions and demonstrations, as opposed to mere verbal assertions. This concept seeks to foster a culture of accountability and truthfulness in legal and social discourse.
7. Controversial and Bold:
Doolittle’s work is known for its controversial nature, challenging established norms and theories in the field of law and social science. He is not afraid to present bold and iconoclastic viewpoints, fostering critical discussions and debates in the academic community.
8. Comprehensive Approach:
Overall, Doolittle’s work on the law represents a comprehensive approach to understanding legal systems and societal structures. His work integrates insights from various disciplines to offer a fresh perspective on the functioning of societies and the underlying principles governing human interactions.
In Summary
Curt Doolittle’s work on the law is characterized by its deep grounding in natural law principles, its innovative and controversial theories, and its comprehensive approach to analyzing legal systems and societal structures. It offers a rich and complex exploration of the law, grounded in a commitment to intellectual rigor and a pursuit of truth.
Source date (UTC): 2023-09-17 23:59:42 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1703559385560010752