RT @AutistocratMS: @curtdoolittle @BanninYaqoobi @NoahRevoy It’s not a failure of feminism, it’s its astounding success.
Source date (UTC): 2024-04-30 17:48:41 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1785365672072987125
RT @AutistocratMS: @curtdoolittle @BanninYaqoobi @NoahRevoy It’s not a failure of feminism, it’s its astounding success.
Source date (UTC): 2024-04-30 17:48:41 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1785365672072987125
RT @AutistocratMS: @curtdoolittle In some cases, they did extend the franchise to then responsible but didn’t provide any safeguards for enβ¦
Source date (UTC): 2024-04-30 17:19:35 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1785358347991929108
There were plenty of us who were hostile to McCain and still are even though he’s passed.
Source date (UTC): 2024-04-30 17:19:23 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1785358300365672639
Reply addressees: @SavageDan
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1785349947795120133
@Ah0xxman Is it possible to fit an interview into your schedule on the blocking problems in credit issuance you discussed in today’s “Mastering Risk In the Blockchain Era” live event? We’re interested in the legal reforms that would be necessary to bring about this possibility and I think you might be able to assist us in producing a list of those reforms, even if just at the categorical level. -Thanks π
Source date (UTC): 2024-04-30 17:01:19 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1785353753362563072
OK. I got work to do today. Unfortunately, the interesting questions are like shiny objects to the attention-crow in my autistic subconscious. So, I’ve gotta hide the Twitter window until I need a break.
Love all you crazy humans. At least the vast majority of the time. π
Source date (UTC): 2024-04-30 16:39:56 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1785348372989186383
McCain had a Hillary problem and was never going to win regardless of his stated positions.
Source date (UTC): 2024-04-30 16:26:15 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1785344928207282678
Reply addressees: @SavageDan
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1785340810134757493
–“Q: WHAT WILL BE THE CONSEQUENCE OF MEN NO LONGER WANTING MARRIAGE OR CHILDREN BECAUSE OF WOMEN’S BEHAVIOR – WILL IT AFFECT VOTING?”–
AFAIK this state can’t continue without collapse. But the social proof of the failure of feminism, like the social proof of the failure of communism, will take time to play out as evidence.
It’s already starting now, but I suspect it will take another decade before we can look at the devastation of feminism and woke, and female capture of education and academy and their influence on business and government. From my work the evidence is in that women are incapable of the judiciary except as wild outliers.
As for the future of voting rights I don’t know. I tend to think that americans will focus on training women by social pressure and education reform, even if my suggested solution of virtual or existential ‘house’ for women would solve the problem.
And while I have a hard time imagining it, I can see that if it gets bad enough the vote being withdrawn from women, as well as those men who have not fully integrated.
To make that happen will likely require we either devolve the federal government or secede or both.
Cheers
CD
Reply addressees: @BanninYaqoobi @NoahRevoy
Source date (UTC): 2024-04-30 16:24:21 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1785344451008700416
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1785336270455013673
CONTENT (METAPHYSICS) AND FORM OF “RELIGION”
Religion is probably over as we understand it. But if we take your meaning as the Metaphysical consequences of a paradigm describing the relation between man and the universe, then maybe. But as we have seen religion has been replaced by ideology and that continues. So without something non-supernatural (perhaps visionary supernormal instead) we will end up with the pseudoscientific (marxist), the supernatural (islam), and the seditionist (judiasm), and the Jewish Leninist authoritarianism (russia, china)
Reply addressees: @badoer77
Source date (UTC): 2024-04-30 16:17:50 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1785342810545172480
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1785339538434326617
WHY IS ISLAM FEMININE IN COGNITION?
Femininity like masculinity has both positive and negative behaviors. For historical reasons dating back to christianity, then to the age of chivalry, then to the victorian counter-reaction to the edwardian, the west has created a ‘unique’ mythology of the feminine as virtuous where throughout most of history women were considered the root of most public evils.
We tend to overlook that feminine behavior is more aggressive and violent than male – just less capable. Additionally Islam (like Judaism) is feminine in cognition, in expression, in justification, and even islamic aggression follows the feminine instincts and behaviors. to ‘drag everyone down to equality at the bottom’. Low capability, low trust, demand for equality obtained by authority and imposed by threat of violence.
Why? low competitiveness by strategic, military, and economic means requiring high trust organization, combined with low trustworthiness, familial and tribal prioritization rather than national bias. Hence ‘why can’t islam organize anything of any scale in any dimension requiring any truth, trust, contract, and scale?
Why are semites in general, muslims in particular, low trust, untrustworthy, permissive with lying cheating and corruption, and as such unwilling to bear costs for the common good, and thus unable to do anything organized at any scale?
Well start with diversity, an average IQ of 84, Islam as encouraging ignorance and obedience, and a long history of institutional failure, and you have a population that is capable of aggression and raiding and conniving and undermining using the false promise of freedom from being members of the world’s lower class, and the resulting inequality, combined with the relief of the cognitive burden of european reason, evidence, and science, and then you have a recipe for the state of affairs.
Thankfully (at least somewhat) (a) the internet has solved problems insular islam has made (b) the slow progress of development and gradual education is creating incentive for nation-states to replace the arbitrary borders of both the ottoman imperialists and the european colonialists.
Cheers
Reply addressees: @BanninYaqoobi
Source date (UTC): 2024-04-30 16:13:38 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1785341751449772032
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1785331313689371014
They are refusing. It’s rather obvious. So?
Source date (UTC): 2024-04-30 15:49:35 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1785335698737742210
Reply addressees: @BanninYaqoobi @NoahRevoy
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1785333313856536850