Try to make an argument. You haven’t yet.
You’re cognitively feminine.
You probably can’t.
It’s genetic.
Source date (UTC): 2024-05-12 20:16:05 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1789751420729626665
Reply addressees: @MoisheTheFried
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1789751239082692632
A math formula, a statement in formal logic, a physics equation, a chemistry skeletal formula, an electronic circuit, an assembly language program, most economics, a set of blueprints, a balance sheet, a good portion of legislation, regulation and law, and certainly my work are ‘word salad’ to those ignorant of the skills necessary to understand them. If you interpret something as word salad you are simply identifying that which your ignorant of. 😉
Reply addressees: @TOEwithCurt
Source date (UTC): 2024-05-12 19:39:15 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1789742154002083840
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1789738461789831598
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
Chris Langan is on Curt Jaimungal’s TOE (@TOEwithCurt) today. Speaking nonsense again, and Curt isn’t capable of handling him. It’s funny that I can find some truth in what Chris says but he’s a bit of a phenomenalist and says ‘start with perception’.
But that’s rather silly since the universe is constructed from trivial rules, everything in it is emergent from those trivial rules, including the neurons that emerge from those same principles.
The universe consists of the defeat of entropy by the production of density that survives in persistent relations – and neurons identify sets of persistent relations.
The only theory we need is evolutionary computation by discovery of stable relations, and the hierarchy of emergent possibilities for recombination and the possible operations they can perform, that emerge from these assemblies – what we call disciplines.
So of course he doesn’t understand Wolfram as simply running evolutionary simulations to identify emergences.
Consequence of combinations are are computationally (operationally reducible) but they are not computationally predictable, nor are they mathematically reducible and so cannot be mathematically predictable.
It’s not that complicated.
CD
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1789738461789831598
Chris Langan is on Curt Jaimungal’s TOE (@TOEwithCurt) today. Speaking nonsense again, and Curt isn’t capable of handling him. It’s funny that I can find some truth in what Chris says but he’s a bit of a phenomenalist and says ‘start with perception’.
But that’s rather silly since the universe is constructed from trivial rules, everything in it is emergent from those trivial rules, including the neurons that emerge from those same principles.
The universe consists of the defeat of entropy by the production of density that survives in persistent relations – and neurons identify sets of persistent relations.
The only theory we need is evolutionary computation by discovery of stable relations, and the hierarchy of emergent possibilities for recombination and the possible operations they can perform, that emerge from these assemblies – what we call disciplines.
So of course he doesn’t understand Wolfram as simply running evolutionary simulations to identify emergences.
Consequence of combinations are are computationally (operationally reducible) but they are not computationally predictable, nor are they mathematically reducible and so cannot be mathematically predictable.
It’s not that complicated.
CD
Source date (UTC): 2024-05-12 19:24:35 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1789738461617889281
Chris Langan is on Curt Jaimungal’s TOE (@TOEwithCurt) today. Speaking nonsense again, and Curt isn’t capable of handling him. It’s funny that I can find some truth in what Chris says but he’s a bit of a phenomenalist and says ‘start with perception’ but that’s rather silly…
Source date (UTC): 2024-05-12 19:24:35 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1789737418863570966
Chris Langan is on Curt Jaimungal’s TOE (@TOEwithCurt) today. Speaking nonsense again, and Curt isn’t capable of handling him. It’s funny that I can find some truth in what Chris says but he’s a bit of a phenomenalist and says ‘start with perception’ but that’s rather silly since the universe is constructed from trivial rules, everything in it is emergent from those trivial rules, including the neurons that emerge from those same principles. The universe consists of the defeat of entropy by the production of density that survives in persistent relations – and neurons identify sets of persistent relations. The only theory we need is evolutionary computation by discovery of stable relations, and the emergent possibilities for recombination that emerge from these assemblies.
So of course he doesn’t understand Wolfram as simply running evolutionary simulations to identify emergences.
Source date (UTC): 2024-05-12 19:20:26 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1789737418741997568
WHY DID RELIGIONS EVOLVE?
Religions arose for a good reason in the age of transformation – whenever population density reaches a point where importance to others, clan differences and class differences emerge and alienatino results we require religion. Where originally religion evolved out of the intersection of burial and feast, and formal religion evolved out of the generalization to all of the initiatic brotherhood of warriors. All of these: burial, feast, male adulthood, and the initiatic brotherhood of warriors are bondings that reduce the alienation that occurs with maturity and need for self responsibility.
Reply addressees: @Xene1042 @whatifalthist
Source date (UTC): 2024-05-12 18:22:13 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1789722764418433024
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1789721839041671613
at least for some people. for others the spiritual existence whether close to reason, close to intuition or close to dreamworld is a desirable state of mental homeostasis (for reasons I can easily explain).
Source date (UTC): 2024-05-12 18:18:38 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1789721865482567821
Reply addressees: @Xene1042 @whatifalthist
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1789721417224757333
correct
Source date (UTC): 2024-05-12 18:17:18 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1789721527895642269
Reply addressees: @Xene1042 @whatifalthist
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1789721417224757333
AVOID THOSE WHO FIND CONFLICT IN TRUTH
Do not feed trolls, agitants, or ruffled feathers when they are disturbed by the truth. And in personal affairs, management, business, and court, use time to dissipate emotions, so that rational incentives remain. If rational incentives are insufficient the exit then relationship, terminate the employee, vendor, or customer, reorganize or sell the business, and fight it out in court exposing them and the court to the truth – time almost always results in settlement. If it doesn’t then it will never settle, so cut your losses. Executive time is too valuable to waste. 😉
Source date (UTC): 2024-05-12 17:59:52 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1789717139974234112
THE BEAUTY OF AN INTANGIBLE GOD
The beauty of an intangible god is that we do not need to agree if god is external to the universe, the universe itself, a product of the universe, a product of mankind, a product of a population of people or a product of the individual mind.
All we need agree upon is the morals that god demands, would demand, or could demand from us for our own individual and collective good, and then we are able to find comfort and utility in life, wether experience god via some approximation of dreams, through context of ritual, through some sense of intuition, through comportment with tradition, or with rational understanding of the morals, traditions, rituals and institutions in producing mindfulness harmony and cooperation among people.
The only problem arises when on claims knowledge one does not and cannot posses in order to mandate beliefs rather than demand adherence to moral behavior we should have obtained by discipline and saturation in the religion’s traditions.
Hugs
CD
Reply addressees: @Xene1042 @whatifalthist
Source date (UTC): 2024-05-12 17:53:47 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1789715610747727872
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1789010444457279960