Author: Curt Doolittle

  • They’ll be ready. The research and draft is done. It’s just a lot of work to con

    They’ll be ready. The research and draft is done. It’s just a lot of work to convert concepts into strictly constructed legal prose. πŸ™


    Source date (UTC): 2024-05-14 18:18:02 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1790446489665249545

    Reply addressees: @Jehuti2023

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1790387555793326177

  • RT @curtdoolittle: @finishedyet34 In the end, all action possible in social, eco

    RT @curtdoolittle: @finishedyet34 In the end, all action possible in social, economic, and political context is a result of the permission…


    Source date (UTC): 2024-05-14 18:15:36 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1790445877187735792

  • In the end, all action possible in social, economic, and political context is a

    In the end, all action possible in social, economic, and political context is a result of the permission of those capable of organizing more violence.


    Source date (UTC): 2024-05-14 18:15:31 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1790445854165266739

    Reply addressees: @finishedyet34

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1790441839012827600

  • Well, that’s philosophy. I do law. πŸ˜‰

    Well, that’s philosophy. I do law. πŸ˜‰


    Source date (UTC): 2024-05-14 18:14:06 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1790445500971323857

    Reply addressees: @auny_marie @finishedyet34

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1790445354984316948

  • The Ten Commandments are an Abrahamic Ideology Imitated from a Long Regional His

    The Ten Commandments are an Abrahamic Ideology Imitated from a Long Regional History, and Not an Original Composition

    The Ten Commandments, traditionally found in the Hebrew Bible (Exodus 20:1-17 and Deuteronomy 5:4-21), are a set of moral and ethical principles that have… https://twitter.com/finishedyet34/status/1790433130094231861


    Source date (UTC): 2024-05-14 18:13:40 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1790445390229037397

  • YOU CANNOT HAVE A NATURAL RIGHT TO CONSTRUCT, ADVOCATE, OR INDOCTRINATE INTO, A

    YOU CANNOT HAVE A NATURAL RIGHT TO CONSTRUCT, ADVOCATE, OR INDOCTRINATE INTO, A SUPERNATURAL RELIGION – ONLY A PRIVILEGE

    –“Thanks to freedom of religion I can believe whatever I want.”–

    1. You can believe whatever you want.
    2. Freedom of belief is of course irrevocable.
    3. Freedom of the public practice of a religion IS revokable.
    4. Because the social construction of fraud by false promise of the unpromisable and the externalities produced by such fraud, is criminalizable.
    5. Because all supernatural religions are untestifiable and their false promises unwarrantable and as such unpromisable.

    Ergo, you may have the natural right to believe and think because it cannot be deprived from you.

    But then again, your capacity to speak it, advocated it, and argue in matters of the commons using it, is absolutely positively prohibitable and punishable.

    In fact the only reason it hasn’t been done more frequently, is that those false hopes, like drugs, and other fantasies, do in fact calm the minds of those less capable of survival and adaptation in the real world.

    It took me years to find justification for not outlawing all supernatural religions, because they are in fact, a violation of the demand for truthful reciprocal speech in the commons.

    In the end, it’s a simple recognition that archaic religions are cheap, because they had to be, but the world requires revised ‘religions’ in the broad sense of the term, that are not false – well, that turns out to be costly just like education.

    Don’t presume a privilege is a right.
    Don’t presume a Political right is a natural right.
    Don’t presume even a natural right is possible without others insuring it.

    Affections
    CD

    Reply addressees: @finishedyet34


    Source date (UTC): 2024-05-14 17:56:35 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1790441089972752384

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1790433130094231861

  • “I knew Curt would automatically be on the J’s”– Well you aren’t aware that in

    –“I knew Curt would automatically be on the J’s”–

    Well you aren’t aware that in my first career I put three families of Ashkenazi white collar criminals into the brutality of the legal system and ruined them and their businesses permanently. I only stopped because I realized after meeting my wife, that ‘dancing with the devil changes you, not the devil.’

    I am not technically anti-semitic, sexist, or racist or anything else of that nature. But I have an odd obsession with both truth, fairness, moral conviction (probably because of my childhood) and, prosecution of evil.

    So accidentally, despite leaving that occupation, even after a stint in the Justice Department, and focusing on building and running my own companies, I found that what I had observed as criminal behavior was, at social, economic, political, and strategic scales, the entire marxist system of baiting into hazard. From there I understood it was a jewish group strategy, and that marxism was a reformation of the seditions of the abrahamic religions. From there I discovered it was a semitic strategy because of the demographics and geography of the region. And from there that it was the female strategy of constraining alpha males put into a group competitive strategy, and it’s institutional forms, and resulting traditions, norms, values, and even metaphysical judgements.

    So I seek to produce laws that prohibit and punish the feminine method conflict of parasitism, free riding, socialization of losses, privatization of commons, rent seeking, corruption, undermining, sedition, treason, and social warfare from within.

    And I don’t (like most of you) consider it a ‘jewish’ problem so much as OUR problem to equally suppress the feminine means of antisocial, anti-political, anti-civilizational warfare that is the natural product of the evolution of female instinct and intuition.

    I’ve done the work in every discipline necessary from neuroscience to behavior, to natural law (ethics, morals), to the law itself, to government, legislation, regulation, policy, education, and even religion.

    Unfortunately I’ve been seriously ill again three times while working on it, and the ‘market demand’ for this solution prior to bloody revolution is sort of catching up to me despite that I was working on this problem for decades. πŸ˜‰

    I’m not a trivial thinker by any stretch of the imagination and it was extremely hard work over many years. It’s a hard problem. If it wasn’t. Someone would have done it before me. πŸ˜‰

    Because unlike you who sense identify and believe things, but cannot convince others who disagree, I have to scientifically demonstrate things, produce a constructive (causal) logic explaining those things, and produce a law with that logic that suppresses those things. And it has to be inescapable even by those vehemently against our suppression of those things.

    No criminal gives up his crimes because all criminals justify their crimes. It doesn’t mater if they’re small or large. Or if they’re committed by an individual or a would ethnicity or civilization.

    In other words fixing this problem is not a problem for THEM to solve, it’s a problem for US to solve. And no one else is going to solve it for you(us).

    Affections.
    CD

    Reply addressees: @ThorneCombest


    Source date (UTC): 2024-05-14 17:41:59 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1790437418358743041

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1790430257922617347

  • Love you back. If I fail for all, at least I will succeed for ours, by trying to

    Love you back. If I fail for all, at least I will succeed for ours, by trying to succeed for all.

    hugs πŸ˜‰


    Source date (UTC): 2024-05-14 17:20:12 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1790431933932998677

    Reply addressees: @radiofreenw

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1790430647841955984

  • (well done.). πŸ˜‰

    (well done.). πŸ˜‰


    Source date (UTC): 2024-05-14 17:19:26 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1790431741867409893

    Reply addressees: @ThorneCombest

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1790430715554791521

  • Q: “Why Fundamentalist Christians Should Never Project Scripture or Faith – Only

    Q: “Why Fundamentalist Christians Should Never Project Scripture or Faith – Only Christian Ethics and Morals, and Only in Normative Terms?”

    Loving our fellow devout Christians and Christian familial and social behavior, does not require those of us who are traditionalists, rationalists, or empiricists, treat archaic texts as anything other than mythology invented for the purpose of indoctrinating illiterate uneducated masses of women, peasants and slaves into that Christian ethic.

    What you and those like you don’t recognize and cannot tolerate because it forces you to question your illusions, is that by claiming the rest of us should follow the same mysticism, you’re accusing us of being illiterate, uneducated, incompetent, masses, of the effeminate, women, peasants and slaves. And that you are confessing you’re illiterate uneducated incompetent masses, of the effeminate, women, peasants and slaves.

    With Love
    CD

    Reply addressees: @finishedyet34


    Source date (UTC): 2024-05-14 17:18:58 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1790431622254239744

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1790414799983215091