Author: Curt Doolittle

  • Thanks. You’re opinion matters to me. (I finally feel like my health and mind ha

    Thanks. You’re opinion matters to me.
    (I finally feel like my health and mind have recovered to pre-covid conditions. So I’m doing better work again.)


    Source date (UTC): 2024-05-29 00:32:13 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1795614085792579957

    Reply addressees: @Psyche_OS

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1795611394630619270

  • MARS: MISSING MUSK’S POINT Like many, you miss Musk’s point, which is that the i

    MARS: MISSING MUSK’S POINT
    Like many, you miss Musk’s point, which is that the incremental solution to these problems by actually testing our ideas and discovering alternatives is the only way that we get to interstellar flight and the capacity for mankind to live independently of this planet and our solar system – both of which seem to attempt to exterminate us with disturbing regularity.
    In other words he’s not seeking mars for mars’ sake but mars as a step in the research and development program that brings us to the stars and evolutionary autonomy.
    And it’s not like anyone on earth makes better use of capital than he does in advancing technology, precisely because he uses this approach to innovation in advancement they way the Japanese do in refinement.
    We cant even get our government to worry about the next decade.

    Reply addressees: @LinusEkenstam


    Source date (UTC): 2024-05-28 23:55:40 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1795604887322951680

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1795600846077731068

  • THE CAUSE OF WOMEN’S BEHAVIOR AND SOLUTION TO THE INTRODUCTION OF WOMEN INTO ECO

    THE CAUSE OF WOMEN’S BEHAVIOR AND SOLUTION TO THE INTRODUCTION OF WOMEN INTO ECONOMY AND POLITY
    ( Update: I should have completed the argument. 😉 )

    –“So as Machiavelli, the Romans, and the Spartans have warned us, inclusion of women in politics, like universal enfranchisement,… https://twitter.com/Lord__Sousa/status/1795598031234253048


    Source date (UTC): 2024-05-28 23:49:41 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1795603381823639565

  • sure, read medieval english law

    sure, read medieval english law.


    Source date (UTC): 2024-05-28 23:33:47 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1795599380080443709

    Reply addressees: @JimReckoning @WallStreetSilv

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1795598418058105039

  • “Kids my age actually are quite scared of approaching woman.”– Nervousness, Cau

    –“Kids my age actually are quite scared of approaching woman.”–
    Nervousness, Cautiousness, Risk, and Scared are four different things. The first is simply social and emotional, the second is a matter of social consequences, the third is the social, mating, and economic consequences, and the fourth is a matter of lifetime consequences.

    I do understand nervousness, and I understand that women’s behavior given the utility of social media for attention-whoring is irresistible to them, and I understand that there are women who will use attention whoring as a means of intentional harm, so I do understand caution and concern for risk. On the other hand those are somewhat mitigable, while marriage and children are effectively suicidal.

    Reply addressees: @adominguez792


    Source date (UTC): 2024-05-28 23:05:41 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1795592310073241600

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1795590738367193513

  • Q: Curt: “Can you elaborate on the “equal suppression in law of female antisocia

    –Q: Curt: “Can you elaborate on the “equal suppression in law of female antisocial and anti political behaviour as that of men”?”—

    Correct. While the common law of england included prohibitions on female antisocial behavior, (what I call GSRRM, which you can search for in my fee), the law against male behavior increased with male agency, rather rapidly after the years 700-1000 depending upon where you were in Europe. With “genetic pacification” being the result: hanging 1% of the population every generation, and war and disease taking care of the rest.
    Conversely, women lacked agency until the industrial revolution. And we only integrated them into the labor force and the franchise (voting) after the first world war, and only massively into the work force and education after 1960.
    So it took time for the traditional behaviors to dissipate and new generations to abandon them.
    And it coincided with the movement of the marxist school from europe using class marxism, to the USA using race marxism (which means it’s just about those who lack productive ability seeking power, not about achieving good).
    So with the success of the left in undermining our institutions beginning with our universities then our press, then our education system, it took time for the seditionist movements to do their work across generations, and the result has been the present set of crises.
    In retrospect had we brought forward those common law prohibitions – most of which are interference, speech, ‘kings peace’, and liability related – then none of this would have been possible.
    And as such the laws can be constructed to suppress the feminine antisocial behavior we’ve observed just as we incrementally suppressed the masculine antisocial behavior we observed a few centuries earlier as men were able to experiment tiven the new technologies of agrarian production, steel, ships, and gunpowder.

    Sedition is women’s gunpowder, lies are their rifles, and pretense of victimhood and innocence their shields.

    Cheers
    CD

    Reply addressees: @JimReckoning @WallStreetSilv


    Source date (UTC): 2024-05-28 22:58:50 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1795590586390417408

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1795579659574538290

  • CONSTRUCTIVE CRITICISM FOR MATTHEW (@mattyglesias) AND FRIENDS (Against False Cl

    CONSTRUCTIVE CRITICISM FOR MATTHEW (@mattyglesias) AND FRIENDS
    (Against False Claims of Illogical Racism)

    Unless you recognize that almost half the black population is below the threshold of military service, of employability, of self sustainability, and of self regulation, because of group differences in demand for internal vs external social behavioral regulation, and as such, formation of networks of cooperation and dependency on those shared terms, you will continue to blame racism for what are biological differences that cannot be overcome using the same institutions that western and eastern people have produced – both of which require greater neotenic evolutionary adaptation, the resulting greater suppression of rates and depths of maturity, and the increase in self regulation possible in ethnically European and East Asian populations.

    While it remains fashionable due to the conversion of Jewish separatist strategy of sedition to marxist class sedition to race marxism and sex marxism, by claims of human sex, class, and group evolutionary indifference – despite that the present evidence is as clear as the sequential failure of each marxist seditionist movement – in order that those of you who do so, may to hide be hind the pretense that western civilization’s demand for responsibility for self regulation, behavior, and the capital of both family, the private, and the common – is oppression rather than domestication.

    The answer is, that the science and the evidence of the demonstration of human behavior have settled the matter permanently. With intelligence, meaning class differences, prior to 1990, the blank slate prior to 2000, sex differences by 2012, and race differences by 2018. And those of you who have malinvested in what we call ‘fictionalisms’ – which are the conversion of middle eastern supernatural mythicism into pseudoscientific mythicism, are still as anchored in falsehoods as are academics with their failed theories, that only end with tombstones to a life of malinvestment.

    So those of us who follow those of you who use the female method of attention seeking, the female method of undermining, the female method of sedition, and the female method of warfare, by seduction of the less able into the false promise that the laws of nature, including, scarcity, human nature, and natural selection, whether in abrahamic supernatural false promises, or marxist sequence pseudoscientific false promises, are circumventable through social construction, by still claiming western and eastern populations exist by systemic acts of oppression rather than the result of evolution – and that the ancient European masculine aristocratic attempt to domesticate the yet undomesticated sexes, classes, cultures (yours) and races, into equal responsibility for self, private and common, as the only means of preserving that which you yourselves cannot demonstrably produce – so you seek by false promise and sedition, seduction and social construction, to obtain by free riding, rent seeking, and corruption – especially corruption of those institutions that make that responsibility possible – that which you are unable and unwilling to produce. yourselves.

    And so you use rallying of others who are equally or even less incapable, to the cause of resistance to domestication, under the false accusation of oppression, such that by social construction, and abuse of the rule of law and democratic process, to extract a spectrum of rents, privileges, and corruptions, from europeans – just as women do by seduction of men, special pleading, and claims of victimhood, thus evading the punishments that would result from the open declaration of their wants at the expense of others without paying the same cost of behavior and effort of others, and thus violating one of those laws of nature, both scarcity, of behavior, and of natural selection we call ‘reciprocity’.

    Whether you read this or not doesn’t particularly matter, because your malinvestment and your possible cultural or even genetic biases are something you cannot over come or you would have already integrated into western civilization’s demand for responsibility and especially the evasion of sedition by encouraging irresponsibility in others.

    What matters instead is that those who do read this do understand it, then know the crimes you perpetuate, such that when this next opportunity for political reorganization occurs – and its racing toward us – we can equally suppress your feminine antisocial, anti-political, and anti-civilizational behavior as just another act of basic but sophisticated fraud at scale, and a crime worthy of ongoing restitution, punishment, and prevention – which are the three purposes of law that protects reciprocity: the natural law of cooperation.

    Cheers
    CD


    Source date (UTC): 2024-05-28 22:48:28 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1795587976598065152

  • CONSTRUCTIVE CRITICISM FOR MATTHEW (@mattyglesias) AND FRIENDS (Against False Cl

    CONSTRUCTIVE CRITICISM FOR MATTHEW (@mattyglesias) AND FRIENDS
    (Against False Claims of Illogical Racism)

    Unless you recognize that almost half the black population is below the threshold of military service, of employability, of self sustainability, and of self regulation, because of group differences in demand for internal vs external social behavioral regulation, and as such, formation of networks of cooperation and dependency on those shared terms, you will continue to blame racism for what are biological differences that cannot be overcome using the same institutions that western and eastern people have produced – both of which require greater neotenic evolutionary adaptation, the resulting greater suppression of rates and depths of maturity, and the increase in self regulation possible in ethnically European and East Asian populations.

    While it remains fashionable due to the conversion of Jewish separatist strategy of sedition to marxist class sedition to race marxism and sex marxism, by claims of human sex, class, and group evolutionary indifference – despite that the present evidence is as clear as the sequential failure of each marxist seditionist movement – in order that those of you who do so, may to hide be hind the pretense that western civilization’s demand for responsibility for self regulation, behavior, and the capital of both family, the private, and the common – is oppression rather than domestication.

    The answer is, that the science and the evidence of the demonstration of human behavior have settled the matter permanently. With intelligence, meaning class differences, prior to 1990, the blank slate prior to 2000, sex differences by 2012, and race differences by 2018. And those of you who have malinvested in what we call ‘fictionalisms’ – which are the conversion of middle eastern supernatural mythicism into pseudoscientific mythicism, are still as anchored in falsehoods as are academics with their failed theories, that only end with tombstones to a life of malinvestment.

    So those of us who follow those of you who use the female method of attention seeking, the female method of undermining, the female method of sedition, and the female method of warfare, by seduction of the less able into the false promise that the laws of nature, including, scarcity, human nature, and natural selection, whether in abrahamic supernatural false promises, or marxist sequence pseudoscientific false promises, are circumventable through social construction, by still claiming western and eastern populations exist by systemic acts of oppression rather than the result of evolution – and that the ancient European masculine aristocratic attempt to domesticate the yet undomesticated sexes, classes, cultures (yours) and races, into equal responsibility for self, private and common, as the only means of preserving that which you yourselves cannot demonstrably produce – so you seek by false promise and sedition, seduction and social construction, to obtain by free riding, rent seeking, and corruption – especially corruption of those institutions that make that responsibility possible – that which you are unable and unwilling to produce. yourselves.

    And so you use rallying of others who are equally or even less incapable, to the cause of resistance to domestication, under the false accusation of oppression, such that by social construction, and abuse of the rule of law and democratic process, to extract a spectrum of rents, privileges, and corruptions, from europeans – just as women do by seduction of men, special pleading, and claims of victimhood, thus evading the punishments that would result from the open declaration of their wants at the expense of others without paying the same cost of behavior and effort of others, and thus violating one of those laws of nature, both scarcity, of behavior, and of natural selection we call ‘reciprocity’.

    Whether you read this or not doesn’t particularly matter, because your malinvestment and your possible cultural or even genetic biases are something you cannot over come or you would have already integrated into western civilization’s demand for responsibility and especially the evasion of sedition by encouraging irresponsibility in others.

    What matters instead is that those who do read this do understand it, then know the crimes you perpetuate, such that when this next opportunity for political reorganization occurs – and its racing toward us – we can equally suppress your feminine antisocial, anti-political, and anti-civilizational behavior as just another act of basic but sophisticated fraud at scale, and a crime worthy of ongoing restitution, punishment, and prevention – which are the three purposes of law that protects reciprocity: the natural law of cooperation.

    Cheers
    CD

    Reply addressees: @mattyglesias


    Source date (UTC): 2024-05-28 22:47:47 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1795587801842397186

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1795573657382907965

  • Yes. Same. 😉

    Yes. Same. 😉


    Source date (UTC): 2024-05-28 22:02:09 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1795576320493261191

    Reply addressees: @lerpclide40920

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1795576051449688421

  • Men Aren’t Scared, They’re Just Rational Men aren’t scared. Women always project

    Men Aren’t Scared, They’re Just Rational

    Men aren’t scared. Women always project female emotions where men don’t have them. Instead, it’s that “the market for affection” has failed, and costs and risks of interacting with women are such that no effort at discovering a ‘coincidence of wants‘ is worth the investment.
    Men grasp that women live ‘within time’ and men live ‘across time’. That women seek consumption at lowest investment, and men seek capitalization at lowest investment. As such women demonstrate devotion in time but not loyalty over time, while men my vary devotion in time, they will maintain loyalty over time.
    Men understand that most women are looking for entertainment (consumption) rather than investment in the production of a family. And even then, women will nearly always leave, and take have the men’s investments.
    Then women can still pursue a new relationship by selling sex, affection and care, but men are no longer able to sell exclusivity of attention and investment to another woman.
    And worse, it means men are impoverished in later age because women have thus not only extracted the capital material relationship, and caretaking capital that men produced, but prevented them from creating new capital.
    Men understand that this system can’t continue because the rate of marital and reproductive collapse, and with it, men’s incentive to accumulate capital for themselves and for the polity, means the end of our political system, our economy, our various social security, and very likely our cohesion as a single territory.
    Men are going to continue to go this direction ‘until market demand forces women to bring a different product to market‘.
    We are seeing the breakdown of the magical thinking of the feminists at the moment, just as we saw the breakdown of the marxist in the past. It may take a while to work through the population but it will do so.
    Unfortunately, we are at the point where the combination of feminism and the collapse of reproduction, women’s advocacy of massive immigration and diversity, and the end of the developing world being technologically and economically behind, and are about to enter what appears to be a depression that will last a few decades, including a new technology that will largely affect women in administrivia roles.
    So, I’m a little worried that just like the Italians, Germans, Russians, and Chinese, we’ll be beyond the point of demographic cultural economic and political recovery by the time that women’s behavior adapts to the new circumstances.
    So as Machiavelli, the Romans, and the Spartans have warned us, inclusion of women in politics, like universal enfranchisement, simply poisons the well of responsibility upon which all civilizations depend for their persistence.
    I think there is a solution to the problem of including women, and that’s simply the equal suppression in law of female antisocial and anti political behavior as that of men. (Which is what our traditional western ethics sought and achieved.)
    And from that perspective, the problem is fixable.
    It’s just a question of whether we’re too late, or on time. 😉
    Cheers CD

    Source date (UTC): 2024-05-28 22:01:54 UTC

    Original post: https://x.com/i/articles/1795576258794868753