Author: Curt Doolittle

  • OMG that’s sooooo gooooood. Yes. Well done. 😉

    OMG that’s sooooo gooooood. Yes. Well done. 😉


    Source date (UTC): 2024-06-04 17:41:17 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1798047385031192765

    Reply addressees: @FatherIsTalking

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1798042958241112075

  • GIVEN THE CRITERIA FOR WHITENESS, ARE RUSSIANS WHITE? –Q: Curt: “Are Russians W

    GIVEN THE CRITERIA FOR WHITENESS, ARE RUSSIANS WHITE?

    –Q: Curt: “Are Russians White?”–
    This is a great question because of the present crisis the behavior of their government, and the practical problem the government has, of a small population policing eleven time zones of unproductive agrarian land, but rich resources for extraction and the consequential resource curse, which only encourages state authoritarianism.

    So Russians have the real problem of heterogeneous empires – and unfortunately, while the west doesn’t mind it applied to the less developed lands and less developed people and certainly applied against the less developed cancer that is islam, the wish to expand their totalitarianism westward into more developed populations instead of eastward and southward into less, is not something the rest of us can tolerate.

    Instead, we had been waiting and hoping that the Russians, like the soviets did, and like the Chinese did, like the Iranians are, and like the north Koreans, will ‘run out of runway’ by their inability to compete with a middle class large enough to produce participatory government, rule of law, and consumer capitalism.

    Even if China has demonstrated that a state that acts like a venture capitalist on top of rule of law and consumer capitalism can outperform the entrepreneurial nations, by that restoration of the public private partnership, instead of the socialist state monopoly or the anglo private monopoly. In other words, the San Francisco Private Equity most corresponds to the responsibility of the monarchies, in producing public private partnerships that produce a competitive advantage.

    So are Russians White? They are, but they are underdeveloped. Why? They were conquered by the mongols, only ended serfdom(slavery) in the late 1800s, and returned to serfdom under the soviets, and then descendeed into anarchy and gangsterism in the 90s, and have retained that ‘insecure’ disposition, by not developing a middle class that is responsible for demanding both public and private responsibility, despite the adoption of christianity.
    In other words there is nothing preventing them from European peerage except (a) the existing government is brutally parasitic upon the people (b) a new government that develops a middle class, (c) an independent judiciary and sherrifs (instead of the secret police) that insures it, (e) and the development of high trust norms -which they do not presently have (f) including the eradication of the jewish > communist > soviet > Putinesque use of propaganda for social construction of falsehoods that affects both them and the west by creating duality between what is true and what is allowed to be spoken.

    We have a similar problem in the west in that we must also eliminate the jewish > communist > soviet > cultural marxist > sex marxist > race marxist migration of the german jewish communist leadership to the west and the jewish conquest into academy, media, and state (the talking classes) using it, combined with willing males that sought power through it, and females that are more than willing if not thrilled to favor this social construction and sedition that destroys western civilizations’ demand for maximum personal responsibility truth and duty both private and public.

    Which is why our standard of life has been and may still be, envious: middle class majority with middle class ethics, because of genetics, culture, and institutions, of middle class ethics. … which is something the greeks were happy to explain 2500 years ago… 😉

    Cheers
    Curt Doolittle
    The Natural Law Institute

    Reply addressees: @poppydoggo29966


    Source date (UTC): 2024-06-04 17:40:44 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1798047245780312064

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1798039977378668830

  • Correct. Well said. Thank you. Shared

    Correct. Well said. Thank you. Shared.


    Source date (UTC): 2024-06-04 17:16:26 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1798041130527043964

    Reply addressees: @FatherIsTalking

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1798041011060723713

  • “Q: 2500 years of failure means 2500 years of useful data. Is your conclusion th

    –“Q: 2500 years of failure means 2500 years of useful data. Is your conclusion that the only possible means towards equality is by dissociation?”– @visco_____

    Disassociation? We can always associate through reciprocal trade. The problem is cohabitation in the same polity. This is why our motto at the institute is ‘let a thousand nations bloom’, so that we can help one another achieve equality of condition through trade despite our differences in evolution and development, and we can progress the best and fastest both as separate polities and humanity as a whole.

    Reply addressees: @visco_____


    Source date (UTC): 2024-06-04 17:15:39 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1798040934829137920

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1798012902101897659

  • I understand. All I care about is moral ambition and intellectual honesty. And y

    I understand. All I care about is moral ambition and intellectual honesty. And you demonstrate both.


    Source date (UTC): 2024-06-04 17:11:31 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1798039894033563907

    Reply addressees: @Lughedd

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1798017076927562182

  • You are correct. You’re usually correct. And I continue to find your humility ch

    You are correct. You’re usually correct.
    And I continue to find your humility charming.
    You’re one of the people willing to work to learn what is hard. And you’re evidence that’s all that’s necessary if you are a moral person who is intellectually honest. 😉
    Hugs. 😉


    Source date (UTC): 2024-06-04 17:10:38 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1798039673631363193

    Reply addressees: @TabbyTeamster

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1798018701461205113

  • THE LAW OF RIGHTS 1. No rights are intrinsic. Even if they are intuitively desir

    THE LAW OF RIGHTS
    1. No rights are intrinsic. Even if they are intuitively desired, a want must be brought into existence. (Need for Non Aggression to permit Cooperation.)
    2. A right always consists of agreement with others, to produce insurance and responsibility to enforce that insurance – as such rights are a always and everywhere a political construct. (Informal Contract)
    3. Some rights are necessary for cohabitation and cooperation – self determination by self determined means by insurance of sovereignty and reciprocity in our demonstrated investments. (Natural Rights)
    4. Some rights are utilitarian in the collective search for scale, and the returns on scale. (Commons)
    5. Some rights are arbitrary. (Privileges that impose on the returns from the production of commons.)
    6. Some rights are violations even if we don’t recognize them as such. (Violate Sovereignty and Reciprocity)
    7. Some rights are harms and we do recognize them as such, but the rights that come before them inhibit our ability to revoke them. (Undermine responsibility for insurance of the sovereignty, reciprocity,, and produce incentive for non-cooperation, non-cohabitation, separation, and if necessary war.)

    Political, social, and economic orders form when the wants of individuals are sufficient to produce an agreement for non aggression against demonstrated investments and responsibility for reciprocal insurance against aggression, rather than the state of avoidance, parasitism, or predation and the costs of that defense.

    Political social and economic orders collapse when the arbitrary, the violations, and the harms accumulate sufficiently to terminate the incentive to cooperate and thus generate demand to separate, or defeat, or decimate.

    Cheers
    Curt Doolittle
    The Natural Law Institute


    Source date (UTC): 2024-06-04 15:17:23 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1798011171074723840

  • THE LAW OF RIGHTS 1. No rights are intrinsic. Even if they are intuitively desir

    THE LAW OF RIGHTS
    1. No rights are intrinsic. Even if they are intuitively desired, a want must be brought into existence. (Need for Non Aggression to permit Cooperation.)
    2. A right always consists of agreement with others, to produce insurance and responsibility to enforce that insurance – as such rights are a always and everywhere a political construct. (Informal Contract)
    3. Some rights are necessary for cohabitation and cooperation – self determination by self determined means by insurance of sovereignty and reciprocity in our demonstrated investments. (Natural Rights)
    4. Some rights are utilitarian in the collective search for scale, and the returns on scale. (Commons)
    5. Some rights are arbitrary. (Privileges that impose on the returns from the production of commons.)
    6. Some rights are violations even if we don’t recognize them as such. (Violate Sovereignty and Reciprocity)
    7. Some rights are harms and we do recognize them as such, but the rights that come before them inhibit our ability to revoke them. (Undermine responsibility for insurance of the sovereignty, reciprocity,, and produce incentive for non-cooperation, non-cohabitation, separation, and if necessary war.)

    Political, social, and economic orders form when the wants of individuals are sufficient to produce an agreement for non aggression against demonstrated investments and responsibility for reciprocal insurance against aggression, rather than the state of avoidance, parasitism, or predation and the costs of that defense.

    Political social and economic orders collapse when the arbitrary, the violations, and the harms accumulate sufficiently to terminate the incentive to cooperate and thus generate demand to separate, or defeat, or decimate.

    Cheers
    Curt Doolittle
    The Natural Law Institute

    Reply addressees: @Homeschool_LLC @forgeoffreedom


    Source date (UTC): 2024-06-04 15:16:38 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1798010981597016064

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1798005801438880062

  • Yes but you’re missing out on the difference between superiority (fact) and supr

    Yes but you’re missing out on the difference between superiority (fact) and supremacy (priority). I’m not fond of supremacy. I don’t see a western want to rule, govern, or integrate with people who aren’t capable of equality with westerners.


    Source date (UTC): 2024-06-04 13:25:49 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1797983096811487562

    Reply addressees: @SenkoS8

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1797896508450435158

  • RT @curtdoolittle: @Titus_Torquatus @orion_pulse Yes. East Asians are much more

    RT @curtdoolittle: @Titus_Torquatus @orion_pulse Yes. East Asians are much more naturally ‘socialist’ where we are naturally ‘commons-ist’…


    Source date (UTC): 2024-06-04 13:23:48 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1797982585781719087