Author: Curt Doolittle

  • BTW: if I havent said so lately- you’re awsome. -hugs

    BTW: if I havent said so lately- you’re awsome. -hugs.


    Source date (UTC): 2024-06-06 23:32:01 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1798860427398623517

    Reply addressees: @Nefertiiti

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1798859941572432370

  • More correctly brad helped me understand how to get through to you two. 😉 You s

    More correctly brad helped me understand how to get through to you two. 😉
    You see, I see the world as incentives. And I ignore what people say as nothing more than misdirecting, obscuring, excusing or advocating their incentives.
    For some reason it’s extremely difficult to get across the complexity of influences that produce such things as the world wars and the solutions proposed after them. So in my view you attribute too much to the negative influences that brought about the condition and I attribute too much to the positive ambitions as a consequence of of the wars. So if you want to draw attention to the bad actors – especially the financial sector and ‘the enemy’s stated goal of ending the monarchies’, I have no problem with that. On the other hand you’d need to recognize that there were moral men with moral ambitions that precisely because they were anglo-scotts-dutch-german protestant moralists, believe they were doing the best thing for mankind – and they were and it worked. If they had other ambitions Patton could have destroyed russia and macarthur china and we would have an even better world fully transformed out of the age of empires.
    That they were duped into fighting the wrong enemy. That they were naive in understanding the internal and external enemy. That they were naive in believing the nature of man would reject the false promises of the enemy. That they failed to purge them in the McCarthy era. That they failed to sop them in the sixties. That they continue to fail to stop them – is still a matter of that damned protestant evangelical optimism and nw European heroism, white man’s burden, and aristocratic mercy is not the same as that they were and still are conspiratorial. Just the opposite.
    And this is exactly what the Russian elites think, and why they call us fools. And its why muslim immigrants refer to europeans as easy ‘victims’. It’s why the jews continue to take advantage of americans – which Bebe has said not so directly but repeatedly. Our morals are both our internal asset and our external risk.
    The smithians were correct. But only if one understands that we europeans domesticated warfare, But the rest of the world still practices TOTAL WAR.
    Which is what I am trying to get across, and somehow for some reason, Luke is opposing that and … well, it caused me to say ‘Ok, I’ve had enough of fighting this team’ for a while and maybe it’s time I just gave up on trying.
    So, you know, I don’t know why this is so hard for y’all to get but brad tried to explain both of your positions to me and he says I’m creating the wrong impression and I think I’m trying to counter a failure to recognize the moral ambitions and the success of those ambitions despite the naivety that both provides those ambitions and allows their undermining.

    Reply addressees: @AutistocratMS


    Source date (UTC): 2024-06-06 23:26:21 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1798858999934181376

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1798845052959277407

  • “What I am most offended by is the abuse of innocents. It’s this abuse of innoce

    –“What I am most offended by is the abuse of innocents. It’s this abuse of innocents that I seek to prevent.”– Dr Brad


    Source date (UTC): 2024-06-06 22:49:09 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1798849637216071722

  • THE OVERLAPPING INTERESTS OF THE FINANCIERS OF THE BOLSHEVIK REVOLUTION AND THE

    THE OVERLAPPING INTERESTS OF THE FINANCIERS OF THE BOLSHEVIK REVOLUTION AND THE FIRST WORLD WAR
    The question of overlap between those who financed the Bolsheviks during the Russian Revolution and those who financed the Allies during World War I is complex and somewhat…


    Source date (UTC): 2024-06-06 22:12:20 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1798840371297849786

  • THE OVERLAPPING INTERESTS OF THE FINANCIERS OF THE BOLSHEVIK REVOLUTION AND THE

    THE OVERLAPPING INTERESTS OF THE FINANCIERS OF THE BOLSHEVIK REVOLUTION AND THE FIRST WORLD WAR
    The question of overlap between those who financed the Bolsheviks during the Russian Revolution and those who financed the Allies during World War I is complex and somewhat controversial.

    (CD: the point here is the ambition to destroy the european monarchies which are the primary means of defense against the globalists and you know who.)

    Wall Street and International Financiers:
    Connections to Both Sides: Some prominent financiers and financial institutions, particularly those based on Wall Street, had interests and involvement in both the Allied war effort and the Russian Revolution. For example, firms like J.P. Morgan and individuals like William Boyce Thompson had substantial influence and connections that spanned different geopolitical interests.
    Bolshevik Funding: There are claims and documented instances suggesting that certain Wall Street bankers and firms provided financial support to the Bolsheviks. This support was often framed as part of broader strategies to influence or control post-revolutionary Russia for economic or political gain. Antony Sutton’s work, “Wall Street and the Bolshevik Revolution,” explores this in detail, although his conclusions are subject to debate and scrutiny​ (modernhistoryproject)​​ (modernhistoryproject)​.

    Strategic and Economic Motives:Financial Opportunism: The motivations for financing both the Allies and the Bolsheviks can often be traced back to strategic and economic opportunism. For financiers, supporting various sides in a conflict could ensure influence and favorable conditions for future business dealings, regardless of the outcome.
    Centralized Control: Some historians argue that international financiers saw potential in centralized political systems, like that of the Bolsheviks, because these systems could offer stable and predictable environments for business, contrary to the chaos of decentralized, laissez-faire economies​ (modernhistoryproject)​​ (Foreign Policy Research Institute)​.

    Sisson Documents and German Involvement:
    German Facilitation: The Sisson Documents, although largely discredited as forgeries, did highlight real aspects of German involvement in facilitating the Bolshevik Revolution, particularly in aiding Lenin’s return to Russia. This support was part of Germany’s strategy to destabilize Russia and remove it from the war, which indirectly benefited the Allies by diverting German resources and attention​ (modernhistoryproject).

    Conclusion

    The overlap in financiers supporting both the Bolsheviks and the Allies highlights the complex and often contradictory nature of international finance during times of upheaval. While direct evidence of coordinated efforts is contentious, the involvement of major financial institutions and prominent financiers on multiple fronts reflects broader strategic interests that transcended individual conflicts.


    Source date (UTC): 2024-06-06 22:12:19 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1798840371016765440

  • THE ANGLO-AMERICAN ESTABLISHMENT “The Anglo-American Establishment” by Carroll Q

    THE ANGLO-AMERICAN ESTABLISHMENT
    “The Anglo-American Establishment” by Carroll Quigley provides an in-depth look at the secretive group of influential individuals in Britain and the United States who sought to shape global politics and maintain British imperial power through a network of elite institutions and influential figures.

    –“the british empire had ‘lost it’s steam’ in world war one and the british felt that the german ascent would displace the british empire in global influence if the british did not compete against it.”–Dr Brad

    The Secret Society:
    Origins: Quigley discusses the formation of a secret society by Cecil Rhodes, an influential British imperialist, aimed at preserving and expanding the British Empire. Rhodes’s vision included creating a global network to exert influence over world affairs.
    Structure: This society, often referred to as the “Round Table Group,” consisted of key figures from British politics, banking, and academia. It operated through semi-secret organizations and sought to wield significant influence over British and international policy.

    Notable Members:
    Alfred Milner: Quigley highlights the role of Alfred Milner, a prominent British statesman, who became a leading figure in the Round Table movement after Rhodes’s death. Milner’s efforts were pivotal in promoting British imperial interests.
    Lord Esher, Lord Lothian, Lionel Curtis, and Others: The book profiles various members who contributed to the group’s activities and spread its influence through various institutions, including the Royal Institute of International Affairs (Chatham House) and the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) in the United States.

    Institutions and Influence:
    Educational and Policy Influence: The group used institutions like Oxford and Cambridge to groom future leaders aligned with their vision. They also influenced policy-making bodies and international relations through think tanks and advisory roles.
    International Relations: Quigley details how this network influenced British and American foreign policies, particularly in the early 20th century, including during World War I and the interwar period.

    World War I and Aftermath:
    War Strategy: The Round Table’s influence on British war strategy and post-war reconstruction efforts is examined. Their vision for a post-war world included establishing the League of Nations to promote global governance and prevent future conflicts.
    Anglo-American Cooperation: A significant part of the group’s strategy involved fostering close ties between Britain and the United States to ensure mutual dominance in global affairs.

    Critique and Legacy:
    Criticism of Methods: Quigley is critical of the group’s secretive methods and the lack of transparency in their efforts to manipulate political outcomes. He argues that their undemocratic approach undermined genuine democratic processes.
    Enduring Impact: Despite his critique, Quigley acknowledges the significant impact this network had on shaping 20th-century international relations and their lasting influence on contemporary global politics.

    Conclusion
    Carroll Quigley’s “The Anglo-American Establishment” provides a thorough examination of a secretive and influential network that sought to shape global affairs through strategic alliances and institutional control. The book uncovers the ambitions, methods, and enduring legacy of this elite group, offering a critical perspective on their role in world history.


    Source date (UTC): 2024-06-06 22:08:16 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1798839350077321216

  • THE TRUTH WILL EVENTUALLY WIN –“You’ve been lied to since 1939. As general Patt

    THE TRUTH WILL EVENTUALLY WIN
    –“You’ve been lied to since 1939. As general Patton said, we fought for the wrong side. The Germans were not the bad guys, we had no reason to go after Germany other than helping the British, who supported the polish in their misbehavior against the germans in Silesia killing 50,000 Germans prior to the war. And even then, the British, who had offers of peace and refused them. We should have stayed out of it. But instead we destroyed the capacity of Germany to keep the east at bay. We destroyed the British empires, failed to destroy the chines and Russian communist empires, brought about the American empires by default, and the same people that destroyed Russia and Germany are destroying the americans by the same means.”– f


    Source date (UTC): 2024-06-06 21:44:55 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1798833475530690560

  • Again, Make your point. If it needs an hour it gets an hour. ok. I don’t want to

    Again, Make your point. If it needs an hour it gets an hour. ok. I don’t want to sacrifice what is the primary message we’re getting across. Effectively speaking the convference is a wrapper around the message you’re delivering so it’s no point diluting it. OK?


    Source date (UTC): 2024-06-06 20:35:45 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1798816068623818865

    Reply addressees: @AutistocratMS

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1798812154142847026

  • Phoenicians would have been an admixture of The philistines were the Minoans des

    Phoenicians would have been an admixture of

    The philistines were the Minoans descended primarily from early Neolithic farmers who migrated from Anatolia to Crete sometime between 9,000-6,000 BCE, with some admixture from the existing local populations. These Anatolian farmers, part of the Early European Farmer (EEF) population, had West Asian/Caucasus hunter-gatherer ancestry.

    During the Neolithic period (around 10,000 BCE), farmers from the Fertile Crescent, including Anatolia and the Caucasus, began to migrate into the Levant, mixing with the local populations. So, the Phoenicians, who emerged as a distinct culture around 1500 BCE, were the result of a complex admixture of various populations.

    The genetic makeup of the Phoenicians is believed to have been primarily a mix of local Levantine populations and migrants from the Caucasus and Anatolia.

    The problem with the levant is that it’s a meat grinder and blender of genetics from every direction. Europeans at least know were’re three versions of european hunter gatherers, and then anatolian farmers, and back propagation of eastern european and caucasion huntergatheres in the steppe replacement.

    the middle east is ‘throw your hands up’ in the air and try to filter out the gene pools that are so mixed it’s absurd.

    Reply addressees: @AutistocratMS


    Source date (UTC): 2024-06-06 20:34:22 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1798815720253599744

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1798804918247293033

  • Interesting. I hadn’t thought about that, but you could say the phonecianization

    Interesting. I hadn’t thought about that, but you could say the phonecianization of judaism, the greek-ification of judaism, the romanization of judaism, and the subsequent counter revolution by the regression of chrsitianity into islam, and the counter-revolutions against christianity by first it’s germanization, second by the classical restoration, third by the development of science and empiricism.
    The middle east ceased evolution early. Egypt was stagnant for millennia. the bronze age europeans destroyed their civilization. All the middle east has done is counter-revolt against the indo-european expansion since then.
    Why? because they are incapable of the trust and trustworthiness of the indo europeans. I know this is partly IQ but

    Reply addressees: @AutistocratMS


    Source date (UTC): 2024-06-06 20:16:29 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1798811217789915136

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1798805100351160768