RT @curtdoolittle: @chlamraypist @MoisheTheFried THERE ARE DIMENSIONS TO SEX DIFFERENCES IN COGNITIVE DEVELOPMENT…. AND HERE THEY ARE:
-…
Source date (UTC): 2024-06-08 19:36:20 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1799525890579144789
RT @curtdoolittle: @chlamraypist @MoisheTheFried THERE ARE DIMENSIONS TO SEX DIFFERENCES IN COGNITIVE DEVELOPMENT…. AND HERE THEY ARE:
-…
Source date (UTC): 2024-06-08 19:36:20 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1799525890579144789
THERE ARE DIMENSIONS TO SEX DIFFERENCES IN COGNITIVE DEVELOPMENT…. AND HERE THEY ARE:
–“Q: CURT: Is it possible to produce a male, who is cognitively feminine, who demonstrates spectrum behaviors of Compartmentalization, Social Anxiety, ADHD and OCD?”–
Answer: of course, we find females with autism spectrum disorder who otherwise demonstrate some variation on the other sex differences. We find males with solipsism and psychosis who otherwise demonstrate some variation on the other sex differences.
WHY?
Bias in the brain: structural, procedural, valuative, reproductive, regulatory – then the consequences:
1. BIASES
(a) Structural
i. Hemispheric bias: Female prey, right hemisphere bias vs Male, predator, left hemisphere bias.
ii. Neurological organization: male more compartmentalized (less, faster. decidability, action), female integrated (more, slower, experiential, preference)
(b) Procedural
i. Temporal Bias: Female lateral in time, vs Male Longitudinal over time.
ii. Measurement Bias: Female empathizing in time vs male systematizing over time
iii: Measurement System Bias: Female verbal, pictorial, empathic bias vs male operational, spatial, systemic bias.
iv. Goal Bias: Female search for consumption as status vs male search for capital as status.
v. Risk Bias: Female evasion of risk vs male utility of risk.
iv. Responsibility Bias: Female irresponsibility (consumption bias + risk) for commons vs male responsibility for commons (capitalization bias + risk).
(c) Valuative
i. Valence, or emotional significance processing of the brain.
(d) Reproductive
i. Attraction (sexual orientation) Male traits vs female traits.
(e) Regulatory
i. Capacity (agency) to regulate impulse: female emotional impulse and flight response, vs male physical impulse and dominance response.
And at least in general terms, they develop largely in that order unless something goes wrong in utero.
2. CONSEQUENCES:
(a) Distribution All people vary on all a, b, c, d, and e axes of development, with sex stereotypes consistent at some level but biases varying somewhat in the extreme. So we can have effeminate males and masculine females but oddly enough, except at the extremes, we can still identify the sex of the individual
by watching the processing in the brain.
(b) Variation in Sex Bias in Organization: Male compartmental autism (insufficient integration) vs female integrated psychosis (insufficient compartmentalization) can occur while maintaining structural, valuative, and reproductive normalcy but the consequence is a decline in regulatory ability and therefore agency.
(c) Extreme (broken) variations can occur in a, b, c, d, or e, without the same variation occuring in the other systems.
For example, one we’re quite aware of, is that sexual development is somewhat fragile, so sexual attraction can vary while preserving all other developmental biases.
So to answer the original question, an individual can be both autistic and cognitively, and valuatively feminine without being reproductively feminine.
Affections
CD
Reply addressees: @chlamraypist @MoisheTheFried
Source date (UTC): 2024-06-08 19:36:16 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1799525872778551296
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1799492455722578128
(CHAT GPT HUMOR)
ME
Who’s the author of [ a set of books ] – that I’m embarrassed I can’t remember the name of at the moment – I need more coffee… lol.. help?
ChatGPT
(answers)
ME
Thank you.
And you’re not going to make fun of me for forgetting it, and thinking I need more coffee?
ChatGPT
Of course not! Everyone has those moments, and it’s completely understandable. Plus, coffee is always a good idea! If you need any more help, feel free to ask.
ME
I think I would prefer if you teased me about it. lol. it’s more cathartic that way… lol
ChatGPT
Alright, you got it! Let’s see…
Forget [author], huh? Sounds like someone definitely needs a double espresso! Next time, I’ll make sure to have a coffee reminder programmed in for those early morning memory lapses. 😄
Feel better now? 😉
ME
omg i love you… lolz
ChatGPT
Glad to hear that! 😄 If you ever need more teasing, coffee recommendations, or just some help with your work, you know where to find me. Cheers! ☕️
(This is how I prefer to work with an AI) 😉
Source date (UTC): 2024-06-08 19:19:29 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1799521649198288896
Yes. In the hierarchy of assemblies of matter, new operations emerge at sales we call disciplines, just as they do in the hierarchy of mathematical geometries and their projections.
Source date (UTC): 2024-06-08 07:31:27 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1799343467979813347
Reply addressees: @getsqt @ToKTeacher @gravitontensor @DanielWhiteson @getairchat
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1799337680234561609
Correct. But is it or not the search for first principles? And why is it easier to develop the first principles of chemistry – it’s largely solved. And why engineering?
Because they’re easier, because we can observe and deduce at those scales, were in the foundations of physics we lack the instrumentation, and in say, proteins we run up against extraordinary complexity.
I won’t get into how physics stopped making models and is using mathematics without understanding the first principles of math, but it’s rare to find even a mathematician that does.
Reply addressees: @Adam_W_Sawyer @ToKTeacher @gravitontensor @DanielWhiteson @getairchat
Source date (UTC): 2024-06-08 07:29:03 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1799342861764153344
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1799340329218249114
Thats nonsense. It means you falsify theories by test of construction from irreducible premises.
Science is reducible to the search for first causes, which result in first principles from which all resulting operations at all subsequent scales emerge.
You may think creatively…
Source date (UTC): 2024-06-08 06:59:11 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1799335348075454500
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1799320411970457690
RT @stclairashley: https://t.co/VkC7fbi6Q4

Source date (UTC): 2024-06-08 05:16:03 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1799309392015155457
RT @miriam_cates: We must be honest with the public about taxation.
The reason that taxes and public spending – are at a record high is…
Source date (UTC): 2024-06-08 05:15:53 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1799309349237723329
RT @MarioNawfal: 🚨🇺🇸DR. VAN MOL: GENDER DYSPHORIA IS A DIAGNOSIS, TRANSGENDERISM AN IDEOLOGY
Dr. Andre Van Mol of @ACPeds, Co-chair of the…
Source date (UTC): 2024-06-08 05:10:31 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1799307999754035609
I block for memes. Please don’t meme on my feed. thx.
Source date (UTC): 2024-06-08 05:03:04 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1799306125948662266
Reply addressees: @FlashGorgone
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1799254993196732430