Author: Curt Doolittle

  • Will, Moral ambitions in the absence of evidence are often the worst crimes that

    Will,
    Moral ambitions in the absence of evidence are often the worst crimes that mankind commits. It’s certainly true of the 100M dead due to leftism and communism over the past era.

    1) If the poor people who are poor because they lack the neoteny, self regulation, intelligence, resulting in unfavorable family structure, traditions, norms, and values, move into communities with better behaved and more able people, the better people will flee. They always have in every civilization and they always will because it’s rational self interest.

    2) Western civ is the highest investment polity (highest psychological and emotional cost) in prosocial norms the world has ever constructed, and association with those incapable of equal prosocial norms only raises the costs and lowers the outcome of less evolved and less developed peoples, and as such those capable of higher investment parenting in suppression of impulsivity, extension of time preference (delay of gratification), and investment in the capacity for individual responsibility will flee those who raise the cost of that investment.

    2) The history of ‘white flight’ (jewish flight, now asian flight), is well documented. You can’t change it. It’ll never change. It’s rational self interest.

    3) Additionally, the history of “Proximity creates hostility” is well documented. It’s one thing if there is no more than 1SD of variation among an ethnic group, but if an ethnic group exceeds 1SD on the average then the lower SD group will always suffer lower status, lower achievement, lower performance, and lower standards of living.

    4) Additionally, destruction of trust and destruction of civil institutions resulting in “bowling alone” is well documented.

    5) When incompatible groups are force into competition resulting in inequality of outcomes the superior group will seek institutional defense against the costs of the inferior group, and the inferior group will seek institutional offense against the inequality caused by their proximity to the superior group.

    6) In case you haven’t been scientifically literate since 1999, the plasticity of humans, meaning the nature nurture debate has been settled, it’s 70-80% nature and 20-30% idiosyncratic experience (randomness). Even if we try, all statistically improvements disappear by adulthood. IQ was settled before 2000. Sex differences were settled by 2012. Race differences were settled by 2018. These are immutable differences in neotenic, sexual, and regional development as mankind spread across the world.

    These differences are not only correlative but causally explained behaviors obvious to every single person who has studied any depth of genetics, cognitive science, behavioral economics, political economy, and those few of us who work in comparative group evolutionary strategies.

    All you are doing will, is confirming wishful cognitive biases that are easily explained, just as pseudoscientists (the marxist sequence) and theologians (the abrahamic sequence) and the many shaman have done for millennia.

    What you don’t understand is that by lying intentionally or by indirectly lying because of a failure of due diligence, and in support of your own cognitive bias combined with false feedback provided by attention seeking, is that you are justifying the end of participatory government, and in particular the participation of women and the underclasses by demonstrating you are willing to profit from the misleading of victims of your deception

    The solution is to admit that copying the Russians during the civil rights era, destroyed the black family, ended the developing black middle and upper middle classes, black institutions, and most importantly the emergent black intellectual class.

    The only solution is self determination, wherein people choose who they want to live with and who they do not. In other words, separation: the federation of many small nation states of europe (at least prior to the french attempt at dominating europe), is the optimum political order.

    Oddly the europeans tried (and are failing) at creating an america of europe at the same time the centralization of america in response to the civil war is being overthrown by trying to conflate continental economic and strategic needs for uniformity, with the regional and local needs for social variation.

    What Im telling you is that you’re just making things worse. You’re not alone. The academy and the bureaucracy who are equally ignorant and inexperience in the organization, management, and governance of people of any scale other than the classroom or department, are doing the same.

    And it’s ending.

    And within a decade it will end tragically.

    And it will be all your (collective) fault.

    “May God save us from well meaning fools.”

    Cheers

    Reply addressees: @whstancil


    Source date (UTC): 2024-07-11 20:12:57 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1811493904425832448

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1811483707233984897

  • (sadness) Doug Morrison of Northwest Front has left Twitter. So sadly another ma

    (sadness)
    Doug Morrison of Northwest Front has left Twitter. So sadly another man of quality has given up on social media. πŸ™


    Source date (UTC): 2024-07-11 19:36:17 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1811484676722172159

  • (Shane, we have over Seventy of these diagrams in just behavioral science, and I

    (Shane, we have over Seventy of these diagrams in just behavioral science, and I don’t know how many in just physical and life sciences on top of it. All our diagrams follow the same organization. In the case of this diagram, it’d need to be reversed horizontally to conform to… https://t.co/PcBfnyd29N


    Source date (UTC): 2024-07-11 19:27:56 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1811482577251062113

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1811454161088598337

  • The core difference is only possible to overcome by trade, not equality. This is

    The core difference is only possible to overcome by trade, not equality. This is because women’s and men’s intuitions are opposite in:
    Risk tolerance vs risk intolerance
    Conflict Tolerance vs Intolerance
    Responsibility vs Evasion of Responsibility for commons
    Capital vs Consumption
    Defense/Force vs Seduction/Undermining
    Over time Systematizing vs In Time Empathizing
    Large scale space and time vs Small scale space and time.

    Reply addressees: @auny_marie @RussellJohnston


    Source date (UTC): 2024-07-11 19:13:50 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1811479026910846976

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1811456615192887799

  • Great question. Yes. But historically we build institutions and techniques and t

    Great question. Yes. But historically we build institutions and techniques and technologies to help us scale anyway. Right now we have a problem of adding the cognitively feminine to economy and polity and the result is collapse which always ends with puritanism.


    Source date (UTC): 2024-07-11 19:10:03 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1811478074653049257

    Reply addressees: @PeterTobias8

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1811457238810103986

  • I don’t think most of you understand our mission. It’s not popularity. I can’t e

    I don’t think most of you understand our mission. It’s not popularity. I can’t even understand why anyone would think so. It doesn’t matter how many people watch joe rogan, or the evening news, compared to how many people read the wall street journal, compared to how many people read “the economist” compared to how many people read the journals such as “Foreign Policy”.

    Y’all live in the world created by and as the victims of what are called ‘scribblers’ … people who create niche ideas that propagate over time. You aren’t even conscious of all the scribblers who have affected every thought in your head.

    It’s not how many – it’s what kind of people capable of doing what, to influence who, to enact policy.

    Reply addressees: @ShortConsensus


    Source date (UTC): 2024-07-11 19:08:18 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1811477633466564608

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1811455403601051731

  • Q: “Have you listened to a speech by, say, Justin Trudeau? Subversion, selfishne

    –Q: “Have you listened to a speech by, say, Justin Trudeau? Subversion, selfishness, irresponsibility and deception describe him perfectly.”–

    Yes of course. He’s cognitively feminine. And everything he says is some sort of lie.
    If you take a cursory look at the evolution of… https://t.co/yK4i1F2LHs


    Source date (UTC): 2024-07-11 17:46:40 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1811457091963417067

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1811424783478977012

  • RT @Claffertyshane: @AndyRowell @curtdoolittle The meta-trait stability increase

    RT @Claffertyshane: @AndyRowell @curtdoolittle The meta-trait stability increases over time, following higher baseline levels of serotonin.…


    Source date (UTC): 2024-07-11 17:45:46 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1811456863516438980

  • Well, You didn’t know me pre-cancer when I wasn’t an asthmatic, overweight, limp

    Well, You didn’t know me pre-cancer when I wasn’t an asthmatic, overweight, limp academic πŸ˜‰ But yes, I have understood that since we formed the organization in 2012. Unfortunately john mark couldn’t take the risk of being the frontman and given our certainty trump would lose the election (we were right) I unfortunately tried to step in. That was a mistake, but at least it was a moral one. We are still looking for front men that we can support with our work rather than trying to use ourselves as the leaders directly. And it’s working.

    Hugs for the honest opinion without criticism BTW. πŸ˜‰

    Reply addressees: @ShortConsensus


    Source date (UTC): 2024-07-11 17:45:20 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1811456757539237888

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1811455185262374979

  • You’re correct, but that’s not a contradiction. There were equal complains that

    You’re correct, but that’s not a contradiction. There were equal complains that women were unsuited for political decisions – and that has overwhelmingly borne out. Given that sex differences in cognition are biases, and given that most of us overlap even if we never completely reverse, we should expect men with cognitively feminine bias, and women with cognitively masculine bias, even if never fully reversed (never happens). And this is overwhelmingly demonstrated in every single form of measurement we know of all the way up to voting behavior.

    Reply addressees: @Case_Construct


    Source date (UTC): 2024-07-11 17:32:18 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1811453475273818112

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1811422774055067848