You are correct Brett. But I have, our organization has, handled this and many other issues in constitutional and legal reform. (though it’s a rabbit hole) 😉
Source date (UTC): 2024-08-20 18:13:06 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1825959258871210430
Reply addressees: @BretWeinstein
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1825924282427535682
😉
(ps: nice beard.)
Source date (UTC): 2024-08-20 18:11:52 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1825958946542096812
Reply addressees: @truthb4face
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1825955943814934624
ASHKENAZI INTELLIGENCE?
I don’t want to drum on this issue, but the following statements are true:
1. Male spatial intelligence is higher than female
2. Female verbal intelligence is higher than male
3. These are the only two dominant differences in intelligence, (and I can…
Source date (UTC): 2024-08-20 18:11:21 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1825958815935995960
ASHKENAZI INTELLIGENCE?
I don’t want to drum on this issue, but the following statements are true:
1. Male spatial intelligence is higher than female
2. Female verbal intelligence is higher than male
3. These are the only two dominant differences in intelligence, (and I can easily explain why those differences exist, and how they they emerge).
4. Europeans balance spatial and verbal IQ as a people.
5. Ashkenazim have higher verbal but terrible spatial.
6. Europeans are cognitively male dominant.
7. Ashkenazim are cognitively female dominant.
8. And in my work studying sex differences in cognition, antisocial behavior, and lying, it’s terribly obvious that these factors are universals and consistent.
9. I am having trouble with the asian metrics because of their higher neoteny and extraordinary investment in repetitive learning, but it appears that the IQ difference we observe exists, and isn’t too far off, but it doesn’t tend to play out in real life.
10. I suspect that the asian spatial-mechanical excellence but verbal limitation is a mirror of ashkenazi verbal excellence but spatial-mechanical ineptitude and an odd tendency for mythicism which is also an evolution of the feminine cognitive structure.
11. However, the primary difference is cultures, and asians and europeans appear quite suitable to one another.
12. And of course, despite working in this field for many years, I have to defend myself in advance, by stating that my objective is to end the pre and postwar industrialization of lying by the marxists-soviets-neomarxists-postmodernists-feminists-libertarians-neocons and woke … and it’s not clear, that they, any more than magical thinking women, know they’re lying or if they are just gene machines expressing themselves in the absence of better training and education.
So, watch these two young folk correctly identify the source of the bad data on this issue: only reporting on the verbal test measures.
https://t.co/AqG0sFySnv
Source date (UTC): 2024-08-20 18:11:20 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1825958815688433664
No, Elon, you pursue the truth, and the truth is always and everywhere the best means of decidability, and decidability the best means of discovering opportunities for exchange, compromise or discovery of alternatives – but most importantly it’s the means of preventing deception,…
Source date (UTC): 2024-08-20 17:28:29 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1825948029435916331
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1825715527446155288
No. We need curt, martin, and brandon to spend three hours a day for 90 days to train the darn thing. I’ve started but I have five parallel projects going on, and I’m kind of, well, you know, at my limit, per usual.
Source date (UTC): 2024-08-20 13:43:13 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1825891339218653500
Reply addressees: @Lord__Sousa
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1825842140577947723
But only one of them gets to choose.
Source date (UTC): 2024-08-20 13:19:44 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1825885430874583223
Reply addressees: @tednotlasso @kyzernick85 @HannahDCox @AutistMaxxing
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1825885099553943931
Apparently someone I care about thinks I’m a racist.
Look, I have a job. That job is the truth. I don’t get an opinion about the truth. That’s a luxury you have. It’s not
one I have. I write law. Constitutional law.
Do you want a judge to have an opinion, or to adjudicate the law by the truth? I work from the truth whether I like it or not. And there are many truths I have discovered that I do not care for. But that’s my job. And someone has to do it.
As a person, I care that you’re moral, kind, and of good manners. As an entrepreneur, you’re all green – I can either make money with you or not. As a philosopher of jurisprudence I depend on the science.
Why? Because my goal is to prevent lies in public, to the public, in matters public, particularly from the government, academy, and media. Why that goal? Because we cannot use the government as a market for cooperation between sexes, classes, and ethnicities unless we work from the truth.
Why? Because the truth is that sexes, classes, and ethnicities do not need ‘one size fits all’, which is eitehr exclusionary or a race to the bottom. We need what suits our developmental differences until we are capable of equal participation according to our abilities.
If you think there is a more moral objective then you’re wrong.
So I will state the painful truth about the differences between sexes classes and ethnicities, and most importantly cultures – because cultures are the source of our problems – not so much our genes.
Would I prefer to live in a homogenous culture in england or scandinavia or northeastern america? Of course. Would most of us prefer to have the opportunity for a mixed culture urban environment either when young or when seeking novelty? Of course. Would I prefer to live with other technology ceos or other public intellectuals, and not people of classes with whom I do not share anything at all other than moral conviction? Of course.
But that doesn’t affect my judgement as an author of law. And it doesn’t affect my behavior in treating all people with respect and kindness and care whenever possible. Nor does it prevent me from, when necessary, stating the painful truth to prevent us from conflict, or to prohibit public servants from lying to us with reckless abandon under the presumption than they know better than the people. (they don’t)
Cheers
Source date (UTC): 2024-08-20 04:48:03 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1825756658846330880
Apparently someone I care about thinks I’m a racist.
Look, I have a job. That job is the truth. I don’t get an opinion about the truth. That’s a luxury you have. It’s not
One I have. I write law. Constitutional law.
Do you want a judge to have an opinion, or to adjudicate the law by the truth? I work from the truth whether I like it or not. And there are many truths I have discovered that I do not care for. But that’s my job. And someone has to do it.
As a person, I care that you’re moral, kind, and of good manners. As an entrepreneur, you’re all green – I can either make money with you or not. As a philosopher of jurisprudence I depend on the science.
Why? Because my goal is to prevent lies in public, to the public, in matters public, particularly from the government, academy, and media. Why that goal? Because we cannot use the government as a market for cooperation between sexes, classes, and ethnicities unless we work from the truth.
Why? Because the truth is that sexes, classes, and ethnicities do not need ‘one size fits all’, which is eitehr exclusionary or a race to the bottom. We need what suits our developmental differences until we are capable of equal participation according to our abilities.
If you think there is a more moral objective then you’re wrong.
So I will state the painful truth about the differences between sexes classes and ethnicities, and most importantly cultures – because cultures are the source of our problems – not so much our genes.
Would I prefer to live in a homogenous culture in england or scandinavia or northeastern america? Of course. Would most of us prefer to have the opportunity for a mixed culture urban environment either when young or when seeking novelty? Of course. Would I prefer to live with other technology ceos or other public intellectuals, and not people of classes with whom I do not share anything at all other than moral conviction? Of course.
But that doesn’t affect my judgement as an author of law. And it doesn’t affect my behavior in treating all people with respect and kindness and care whenever possible. Nor does it prevent me from, when necessary, stating the painful truth to prevent us from conflict, or to prohibit public servants from lying to us with reckless abandon under the presumption than they know better than the people. (they don’t)
Cheers
Source date (UTC): 2024-08-20 04:48:03 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1825750158941790209
Correct. Libertarianism is the ghetto ethics of teh pale of settlement: parasitism on the commons produced by others without paying for that commons with either behavior or contribution.
(Not that mike needs me to confirm anything he says. 😉 )
Source date (UTC): 2024-08-20 03:21:49 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1825734959652347942
Reply addressees: @Cernovich
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1825715359661654144