Truth only hurts the liars.
Source date (UTC): 2025-12-06 03:24:15 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1997145033217286276
Truth only hurts the liars.
Source date (UTC): 2025-12-06 03:24:15 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1997145033217286276
ANOTHER OBSTACLE TO AI BITES THE DUST
Source date (UTC): 2025-12-06 03:23:45 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1997144907799318841
I agree with you. And I think I agree with your assessment. And I would say then this is just our mutual biases as coming from the makers of empires vs the victims of empires.
Source date (UTC): 2025-12-06 00:05:16 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1997094957140824099
Stained glass does not compensate for the christian destruction of the civilization, architecture, arts, and letters of the ancient world, and the increase in superstition and ignorance spread under christianity.
We are still fighting to exit the lies and universalism of the abrahamic religions and their implicit devolutionary totalitarianism of the ignorant.
Source date (UTC): 2025-12-06 00:03:50 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1997094597072494933
Well it would end the UN. And the UN is hostile to the anglosphere, if not the entire eurosphere. And as far as I know, our mission of dragging the rest of mankind into modernity (other than islam, which will take another century) is complete.
And so, yes.
Expel the UN.
Source date (UTC): 2025-12-06 00:01:40 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1997094049652900220
Geoffrey;
True.
Source date (UTC): 2025-12-06 00:00:12 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1997093680520499549
A
Without a doubt or reservation. A.
Source date (UTC): 2025-12-05 23:59:17 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1997093449808646424
We are just starting our outreach. But yes, that’s the feedback we’re getting from everyone.
Source date (UTC): 2025-12-05 23:16:34 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1997082701078450563
I’m not teasing you, just trying to understand: if you criticize the anglo-american empire, and I criticize the russian and chinese empires, and the french attempt to turn europe into her empire, and germany’s failure to counterbalance and function as the core state of the federation of Europe, these are not obviously different arguments.
I mean, I’m clearly missing something.
Part of it is that I understand empires are extensions of manor houses > feudal systems > city states > alliances of city states > states > federations > empires as means of reducing costs of the frictions of defense, trade, cooperation and strategic preservation.
My concern is that empires fail for the same reason as do all states, city states, and feuds and manors: the incentives of corruption at the top suppress the individual aspirations of the rest until the corruption speads and the cooperation necessary for preservation whether institutional or normative, fails in the face of competition, war, or shocks.
So we could take the position that all civilizations no matter their composition go thru cycles of expansion in service of cooperation, separation in service of comparative advantage, and collapse in service of corruption.
Source date (UTC): 2025-12-05 23:15:57 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1997082543905210423
(Love you man)
Source date (UTC): 2025-12-05 22:20:23 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1997068562117357602