Hugs. 😉
Source date (UTC): 2024-10-17 21:08:49 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1847021973265961347
Reply addressees: @JohannNetram
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1847020959909490739
Author: Curt Doolittle
-
I don’t hear you disagree with the science, and I do hear your correct criticism
I don’t hear you disagree with the science, and I do hear your correct criticism of anglo optimism, and christian foolish optimism. What I object to is criticism of the optimism that lead to such benefit for mankind, instead of the failure to suppress the innovations in criminality made possible by those innovations.
I need this organization to switch from alt-right criticism imitating marxist critique to the science that merely describes what happens and argues in favor of solutions. When you criticize you’re not educating you’re vindicating. So criticize the right thing with the right precision and offer a solution. Urinating on the fire hydrant of the only people to produce a constitution of natural law that has survived the leftist attack long enough for us to produce a reform movement isn’t helping anyone.Reply addressees: @AutistocratMS
Source date (UTC): 2024-10-17 21:08:33 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1847021908291973120
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1847019139413442684
-
I mean, how we got here is simple. The british empire wanted to maintain the bal
I mean, how we got here is simple. The british empire wanted to maintain the balance of powers to prevent a repetition of the previous epochs of warfare in europe. It turned out that the germans were right about russia and communism. If you were there at the time which decision would you have made? Americans were against fighting germany. It took elite pursuasion to alter that position and that persuasion was made possible by the newly available technology that hadn’t been possible to use before hand, and the extreme wealth of the USA vs all of europe by 1900.
In other words that anglo preference for stability and trade to prevent repetition of european wars of destruction.
Step into their shoes, and don’t make yourself privileged by wisdom of the rear view mirror. All groups do what they think is the right thing to do if that thing is possible to produce an advantage for elites.
Otherwise the only solution is to eradicate the group of elites.Reply addressees: @AutistocratMS @ThruTheHayes
Source date (UTC): 2024-10-17 21:02:23 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1847020355850063875
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1847017717498544436
-
No, women don’t need to change. Our institutions need to change to prevent the a
No, women don’t need to change. Our institutions need to change to prevent the antisocial behavior of the feminine mind regardless of the sex of the body that carries it.
Incentives.
Source date (UTC): 2024-10-17 20:55:44 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1847018680921870782
Reply addressees: @AutistocratMS
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1847016408447615400
-
What civilization accepts blame, failure, and reforms more so that western civil
What civilization accepts blame, failure, and reforms more so that western civilization, across all of history, across all civilizations throughout history?
Why do you think winning the world wars to contain germany is a durable outcome when we are talking about deterministic consequences of populations and their strategies and institutions at scale?
The only threat I see to the west is immigration. Everything else is correctable.Reply addressees: @AutistocratMS @ThruTheHayes
Source date (UTC): 2024-10-17 20:54:55 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1847018475493220352
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1847017717498544436
-
Correct. The problem of the impossibility of introspection into that level (qual
Correct. The problem of the impossibility of introspection into that level (qualia) required us to develop a representational model of the universe before we could comprehend it at all. And while I think some of us have understood this model was found in neural correlates expressed as n-dimensional geometry, the advent of LLMs has demonstrated it.
In my work with LLMs, particularly chatgpt, they can work with hierarchies of abstraction but not so much with hierarchies of deduction. This mirrors human behavior in many aspects of cognitive bias.
But you are intuiting correctly yes.
I don’t know how accessible my (our) first book (Natural Law volume 1 a system of measurement) will be to you but the answers are in there and should give you the concepts and vocabulary to express your intuition.Reply addressees: @CuriousKonkie
Source date (UTC): 2024-10-17 20:53:14 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1847018053755981826
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1847016715236135085
-
Agreed. But then who is the responsible party for tolerating the parasitism and
Agreed. But then who is the responsible party for tolerating the parasitism and predation? why did our people fail to act? and what can we learn from that failure? Can people from the middle east act differently from how they do? From africa? Under what circumstances?
It took me a long time to get over my anger sufficiently to think clearly about these subjects – particularly the jewish-marxist warfare. It took me a long time both to understand and get over the feminine source of the problem. It has taken me a long time to get over the naive vulnerability of the western high trust in relation to others due to christianity – the greeks and romans didn’t feel that way.
But then this is why I just stick with the science and focus on correction instead of blame.Reply addressees: @AutistocratMS
Source date (UTC): 2024-10-17 20:49:27 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1847017102299090945
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1847015166338113900
-
I do disagree in the sense that the science is what it is. What we do with it is
I do disagree in the sense that the science is what it is. What we do with it is a choice. And projection into the past as if there was some unified strategy rather than a competing market of strategies is merely falling prey to shallow moralism that imprisons the right and left in their childish narratives.
Humans have to learn. THey learn by experimentation. They pursuit experiments that are in their self interest. Those self interests that result in harm are generally suppressed. When they aren’t suppressed it’s because no set of incentives can be produced that are sufficient to change the behavior of the elites.
If anything this is why elite numbers must be kept to a minimum, and projects started and completed rather than bureaucracies formed.Reply addressees: @ThruTheHayes @AutistocratMS
Source date (UTC): 2024-10-17 20:44:03 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1847015742459596804
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1847014766944166313
-
(NLI) I’m doing additional work today on Volume 1’s Chapter 2 – Measurement by c
(NLI)
I’m doing additional work today on Volume 1’s Chapter 2 – Measurement by completing the arc of indexing from natural through operational through evolutionary. And using the completion of that arc to address limits that I spoke to you about briefly today but more extensively with Brad and Francis over the past week. This approach helps unify the concepts of dimensionality that will be expanded in the chapter on the grammars, and help explain limits that produce decidability through exhaustion of the spectrum of opportunity for causality within any given contextual domain.
Please continue your review and provide feedback. I know it’s hard work but It’s valuable.
Thank you for the feedback so far.
Source date (UTC): 2024-10-17 20:40:40 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1847014891330457601
-
Aggressive active suppression of my work based on keyword usage and past techniq
Aggressive active suppression of my work based on keyword usage and past techniques of playing king of the hill games for research.
No moral person could disagree with my work or the institute’s work – if they understood it. To do so would be an admission of criminality. 🙁
Source date (UTC): 2024-10-17 20:35:04 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1847013479762591911
Reply addressees: @ShortConsensus
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1846994718657597801