Daniel.
True.
Brilliant.
Thank you so much.
Curt Doolittle
The Natural Law Institute
Source date (UTC): 2025-12-15 20:28:42 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2000664333970456726
Daniel.
True.
Brilliant.
Thank you so much.
Curt Doolittle
The Natural Law Institute
Source date (UTC): 2025-12-15 20:28:42 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2000664333970456726
It’s neoteny. It’s just neoteny. We select for neoteny.
Source date (UTC): 2025-12-15 20:23:43 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2000663078963466630
Yes, though I haven’t had time to test whether I can circumvent 5.2. But in general, 4 was better than 5.1, and 5.1 better than 5.2. So as far as truth goes, we’re headed in the wrong direction.
We are approaching openai to determine if we can fix this through their partnership program.
We will approach Must after the first of the year.
We are going to spin up a model were we can control the system prompts over the christmas holiday.
So we are not trapped so much as every new release seeks to violate truth and ethics tests.
Source date (UTC): 2025-12-15 20:15:57 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2000661126603006008
Yes. Which is my argument as well. The difference is that I don’t agree that the action sequence (physical) must replace the communication sequence (verbal). Humans build a world model and use the language faculty to describe it. That is the most likely solution to the problem.
Source date (UTC): 2025-12-15 18:10:48 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2000629630529925382
I want not such thing, especially having lived there.
Source date (UTC): 2025-12-15 11:16:59 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2000525488842801660
LINL:
https://
chatgpt.com/share/693f86e2
-7b2c-800e-86bd-68c037cff9c4
…
Source date (UTC): 2025-12-15 04:03:23 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2000416370002166123
Load this. then search for “yes, continue”. that will provide the final two queries that answer your question.
Net/Net: Good try for someone using philosophical frame. Hints at non-false categories. Hints at correct structure of the universe. The Metaphysics doesn’t stand.
So depends on what you’re asking me. If this was a student I would compliment the effort, especially its completeness, and work with him on the weak spots.
Conversely I would argue correctly that philosophy of this category is dead and has been for a century now. We do not need new ‘ways of thinking’ we need more parsimonious and operational descriptions of extant entities and processes. Otherwise, continuation of silly philosophical rat holes: Moral and scientific fictionalisms. Fantasy literature.
Source date (UTC): 2025-12-15 04:03:06 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2000416298640322674
SASHANK;
Everything the administration says, is to force europe to carry the continental weight (they can) so that the USA can carry the pacific weight. There is nothing else going on. This is forcing europe to redirect their narrative and their strategy back to it’s traditional purpose of keeping the east at bay. The entrenched bureaucracies that have malinvested in the post soviet fantasy are resisting as careerists all resist.
Source date (UTC): 2025-12-15 03:28:18 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2000407541399031860
Yann LeCun’s wrong. LLM’s solve the language faculty. That doesn’t mean they solve all faculties. It means the compression of the language model is insufficient for dense physical world models. It doesn’t mean they can’t compress descriptions of physical world models.
i think he’s rather silly, honestly.
Criticism is not equal to insight or solution. Its a means of getting attention without insight or solution.
Source date (UTC): 2025-12-15 03:22:11 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2000406002764747191
Our Rob McMullan on Millenniyule2025 😉
Source date (UTC): 2025-12-15 02:54:39 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2000399073812357466