As far as I know there are no financial incentives that will work. It must be a status incentive. And women must have an alternative means of socializing with other women and producing value in the commons.
Source date (UTC): 2024-11-11 00:54:56 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1855776189358723293
Reply addressees: @AutistocratMS @NoahRevoy
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1855775667155095716
Hugs. 😉
Source date (UTC): 2024-11-11 00:52:36 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1855775600780493250
Reply addressees: @EdwardKulak
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1855775250497323269
(A Repost)
I should post this more often just for the sake of new people to our work.
The Oath of Transcendent Man
A PAGAN, A CHRISTIAN, AN ARYAN, A WARRIOR, A MAN TRANSCENDENT
I am a pagan if 1) I accept the laws of nature as binding on all of existence; and 2) if I treat nature as sacred and to be contemplated, protected and improved; and 3) I treat the world as something to transform closer to an Eden in whatever ways I can before I die; and 4) if I deny the existence of a supreme being with dominion over the physical laws, and treat all gods, demigods, heroes, saints, figures of history, and ancestors as characters with whom I may speak to in private contemplation in the hope of gaining wisdom and synchronicity from having done so. And 5) if I participate with others of my society in repetition of oaths, repetition of myths, repetition of festivals, repetition of holidays, and the perpetuation of all of the above to my offspring. And 6) if I leave open that synchronicity appears to exist now and then, and that it may be possible that there is a scientific explanation for it, other than just humans subject to similar stimuli producing similar intuitions and therefore similar ends.
As far as I know this is all that is required of me to be a Pagan.
I am a christian if I have adopted the teaching of christianity: 1) the eradication of hatred from the human heart. 2) the extension of kinship love to non-kin. 3) the extension of exhaustive forgiveness before punishment, enserfment, enslavement, death, or war.
As far as I know, this is all that is required of me to be a Christian.
I am an Aryan if 1) I proudly display my excellences so that others seek to achieve or exceed them; 2) I seek competition to constantly test and improve myself so I do not weaken; 3) I swear to speak no insult and demand it; 4) I speak the truth and demand it; 5) I take nothing not paid for and demand it; 6) I grant sovereignty to my kin and demand it; 7) I insure my people regardless of condition, and demand it; and in doing so leave nothing but voluntary markets of cooperation between sovereign men; and to discipline, enserf, enslave, ostracize or kill those who do otherwise; 8) to not show fear or cowardice, abandon my brothers, or retreat, and 9) to die a good death in the service of my kin, my clan, my tribe and my people.
As far as I know, this is all that is required of me to be an Aryan.
I am a warrior in that 1) we will prepare for war so perfectly that none dare enter it against us. 2) Once we go to war, we do so with *joy*, with eagerness, and with passion, and without mercy, without constraint, and without remorse; And 3) before ending war, we shall defeat an enemy completely such that no other dares a condition of our enemy, and the memory of the slaughter lives a hundred generations.
As far as I know, this is all that is required of me to be a Warrior.
As far as I know, if I succeed as a Pagan, as a Christian, as an Aryan, as a Warrior, then I have transcended the animal man, and earned my place among the saints, heroes, demigods, gods, in the memories, histories, and legends of man.
And that is the objective of heroes. We leave the rest for ordinary men.
Curt Doolittle
The Cult of Sovereignty
The Philosophy of Aristocracy
The Natural Law of Reciprocity
The Propertarian Institute,
Kiev, Ukraine
Source date (UTC): 2024-11-11 00:50:23 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1855775042195595264
How would you suggest doing this: “start penalizing any organization…”
Source date (UTC): 2024-11-11 00:46:30 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1855774065698734466
Reply addressees: @AutistocratMS @NoahRevoy
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1855766360212549935
1) re: “…Everything with less agency has higher neuroticism and everything with more agency has less.” Should be self explanatory. The stronger, faster, smarter, more dangerous, more innovative, more adaptive you are, relative to your stressors, the less time you need to spend on predicting vulnerabilities. The opposite is also true. Ergo women are more neurotic than men especially because they must devote the majority of their neural effort to the prediction of the behavior of multiple children, given their frailty vs the world and everything in it, and the relative frailty of women vs men.
2) Consciousness in the literature is almost entirely some sort of spiritualism masquerading as philosophical or scientific nonsense. In practical terms it’s an artifact of the time delay of memory persistence necessary for goal setting (wayfinding) in competition with new competing amplitudes of possible goals (reactions etc). In other words if you have enough hierarchical memory you will develop it. Period. End of story. It’s a necessary artifact of the neurological process of disambiguation, organization, episodic formation (the index) and prediction from previous episodes via that index, until we find something or some set of things to seek. Likewise the brain evolved from the organization of movement, to the organization of movement relative to a nest or it’s flock, or school equivalent, in relation to locations for seeking food. So with episode (location etc), memories of other episodes, attention as goal setting, and recursive wayfinding to reach the goal, all cognition evolves as just increases in complexity of that set of primitive functions. The only interesting bit of prediction that affects our consciousness, was the evolution of the social predictions of physical (imitation), emotional (empathy), and rational (sympathy) prediction of others. Once you have that ability you gain the ability to abstract that into working with tools, and from there increasing progression into increasingly complex abstractions.
Reply addressees: @DeclineTheWest @datepsych
Source date (UTC): 2024-11-11 00:44:19 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1855773517658402816
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1855770553405014134
(I’d be willing to spend 30 min with you on it just so I could learn how to answer this question for the others who ask. Let me know.)
Source date (UTC): 2024-11-11 00:24:40 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1855768571449864456
Reply addressees: @EdwardKulak
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1855765749333205054
I”d have to try to teach someone in their field how to do so, and recognize the delta between what they’re doing and what I’m doing. With that understanding I could probably articulate it in general terms.
I’ve been working with neural networks since the seventies, and expert systems since the eighties, and on my current project since the nineties. So I already think about pretty much everything in manifolds. And in that sense I sort of intuit how the models function.
And since I work with them every day, i know how to avoid their tendency to go sideways (which is often).
The primary lesson I’d teach it is that you need to provide it a theoretical foundation of whatever paradigm you’re working with before you can ask questions of any depth or meaning. Writing books (what brad and I do) means we spend a lot of time teaching. it something so that we can ask questions about it.
For your field, you’d need to give either work with it to develop a theory or provide it with a theory before you can ask much of meaning within the context of the theory. In other words you need to provide it with the organization and limits of the context in qhich you want to ask the questions.
Reply addressees: @EdwardKulak
Source date (UTC): 2024-11-11 00:23:51 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1855768365929041920
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1855765749333205054
RT @LukeWeinhagen: @bryanbrey @MythMatrix By removing risk and punishing risk takers we’ve collapsed the opportunities for the journey.
Source date (UTC): 2024-11-11 00:15:22 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1855766228582948875
RT @cremieuxrecueil: Inequality in how much people consume varies radically across different products, but this inequality in consumption v…
Source date (UTC): 2024-11-11 00:12:40 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1855765553140613276
What he fails to understand:
Under common law, and under our common law, he is liable for the consequences of his actions. There is no escape. The fact that we haven’t prosecuted people like him YET, doesn’t mean we won’t prosecute them in the future – because those people who…
Source date (UTC): 2024-11-11 00:11:56 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1855765366963949631
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1855762946112024832