Not sure where you’re getting that from. Semitic ethics are low trust ethics. (European: truth before face, East Asian: Face before truth, Semitic: facelessness – it’s still admirable to ‘get away with’ something. ‘The ethics of the bazaar.’) Africa never progressed until christianity beyond the ethics of the four family types so it’s not easy to discuss their ethics. Christianity was a reform using theology (semitic mythicism) as a means of making semitic peoples capable of cooperation sufficient to resist the european-persian (indo european) superiors. Talmudic Judaism was a revolt that attempted to adopt western rule of law in semitic terms. Islam was a revolt against the corruption of their tribal elders during the period where europe and persia had exhausted themselves. Fundamentalist islam was a revolt against the introduction of european thought into semitic civilization. The reasons for these revolts are largely understood as natural conflicts between populations with vastly different intelligence, institutions, and trust for ancestral reasons. Unfortunately, when the middle east converted to christianity it made progress, but the barbarism of islam – the most backward people in the region – resulted in the most digressive group strategy on earth – which is why islamic cultures is the last to adapt to modernity.