Author: Curt Doolittle

  • RT @elonmusk: Wow, Germany carries a lot of the cost of the EU!

    RT @elonmusk: Wow, Germany carries a lot of the cost of the EU! https://t.co/DPHUz2nWX0


    Source date (UTC): 2024-11-21 12:10:49 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1859570158282699171

  • No vax. One instance

    No vax. One instance.


    Source date (UTC): 2024-11-21 05:59:52 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1859476804186276154

    Reply addressees: @iAnonPatriot

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1859243512597774431

  • Joscha, No. Just the opposite. And if you had such experience you’d understand w

    Joscha,
    No. Just the opposite. And if you had such experience you’d understand why. While academic circles may be petter, they are also powerless, and comparatively small. Having acquired and reformd companies myself, its far harder. But nothing compares to the case of the…


    Source date (UTC): 2024-11-21 02:05:38 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1859417858079588641

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1859416867678666827

  • (Diary – Retrospective) Some of the Companies I Founded Over Twenty Years in the

    (Diary – Retrospective)
    Some of the Companies I Founded Over Twenty Years in the Seattle-Bellevue-Redmond area: All of them sold. But the truth is, none of them grew or survived my departure in one way or another.

    Right now I’m trying to repatriate my company from Ukraine and UK to the States because I’m healthy enough now to do it and the technology has caught up. But in doing so I am … somewhere between concerned and obsessed with ensuring it survives me. Is that rational? I dunno. πŸ˜‰

    Ascentium (2001, 100M), a Bellevue-based consulting firm, underwent significant changes over the years. In 2010, Avanade, a global professional services company, acquired Ascentium’s practice from Ascentium’s offices in Baltimore, Maryland, and Bellevue, Washington, into Avanade’s operations. Following this transaction, Ascentium’s remaining business units continued to operate independently. However, over time, the company ceased operations, and its presence in the consulting industry diminished.

    Redmond Technology Partners (1995, 10M), commonly known as Redtech, was a Bellevue-based consulting firm specializing in technology solutions. In 2012, Redtech was acquired by Sogeti USA, a subsidiary of the Capgemini Group, a global leader in consulting and technology services. This acquisition aimed to enhance Sogeti’s presence in the Pacific Northwest and expand its service offerings. Following the acquisition, Redtech’s operations were integrated into Sogeti’s existing structure, and the Redtech brand was phased out.

    Excell Data Corporation(1990, 100M), a Bellevue-based consulting firm, was acquired by Cambridge Technology Partners. Following the acquisition, Excell Data’s operations were integrated into Cambridge Technology Partners, leading to the discontinuation of the Excell Data brand.

    This is just the top of the list. Every single company, beginning with the first one at 22 years old, I have either created or helped build as part of the executive team, has not survived my departure.

    This is not rewarding. Is any business that does not outlive you rewarding? I don’t think so. My relationships have been rewarding. My life experiences have been rewarding. My work in intelligence was extremely rewarding. My intellectual work though, that’s been and remains rewarding – and will outlive me.

    Cheers
    CD


    Source date (UTC): 2024-11-21 02:03:10 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1859417237834301440

  • Regarding Dating Single Moms: Still seeing the social media fervor over single m

    Regarding Dating Single Moms:
    Still seeing the social media fervor over single mothers rebelling against men not wanting to date or marry them. I understand both sides. But I can’t understand why women can’t understand it.
    I’ve learned a lot because I have a bunch of ‘stepkids’ from the single mom’s I’ve dated (or married):
    1) You will have to adapt to her life not her to yours.
    2) You will always come in second after the kids.
    3) You cannot discipline the children other than in their behavior toward you.
    4) She will expect you to carry the financial weight of the kids despite this – and still use her money for her own purposes.
    5) She will burden you with whatever trauma she has from her previous relationships. And often it will make you want to leave.

    Why does this work – at least, for me:
    1) Busy mom’s impose limited demands on me and my time are in my favor (as a workaholic).
    2) I can get along with everyone easily so fitting into a household is easy – in fact I prefer a woman’s sovereignty in the home as long as I have my ‘peaceful’ place to reset, work, and think.
    3) I can defer to her without impact on my ego as long as it is not a risk to me, cost to me, or disrespectful to me. (Never tolerate disrespect.)
    4) I can support the kids or mom when one or the other gets out of hand – which always happens and makes me trusted by both.
    5) I follow the same strategy in all relationships with women: figure out what makes them feel safe, and provide it. Conversely, figure out if they desire attention, and if so … Run.
    6) I maintain walk away power – which must never be stated, but always preserved.
    That’s why it works for me. I can’t see most men, who need the emotional connection, support, and respect (male version of validation), tolerating these conditions. When they are the optimum conditions for me.


    Source date (UTC): 2024-11-21 00:56:33 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1859400475084488704

  • Regarding Dating Single Moms: Still seeing the social media fervor over single m

    Regarding Dating Single Moms:
    Still seeing the social media fervor over single mothers rebelling against men wanting to date or marry them. I understand both sides. But I can’t understand why women can’t understand it.
    I’ve learned a lot because I have a bunch of ‘stepkids’ from the single mom’s I’ve dated (or married):
    1) You will have to adapt to her life not her to yours.
    2) You will always come in second after the kids.
    3) You cannot discipline the children other than in their behavior toward you.
    4) She will expect you to carry the financial weight of the kids despite this – and still use her money for her own purposes.
    5) She will burden you with whatever trauma she has from her previous relationships. And often it will make you want to leave.

    Why does this work – at least, for me:
    1) Busy mom’s impose limited demands on me and my time are in my favor (as a workaholic).
    2) I can get along with everyone easily so fitting into a household is easy – in fact I prefer a woman’s sovereignty in the home as long as I have my ‘peaceful’ place to reset, work, and think.
    3) I can defer to her without impact on my ego as long as it is not a risk to me, cost to me, or disrespectful to me. (Never tolerate disrespect.)
    4) I can support the kids or mom when one or the other gets out of hand – which always happens and makes me trusted by both.
    5) I follow the same strategy in all relationships with women: figure out what makes them feel safe, and provide it. Conversely, figure out if they desire attention, and if so … Run.
    6) I maintain walk away power – which must never be stated, but always preserved.
    That’s why it works for me. I can’t see most men, who need the emotional connection, support, and respect (male version of validation), tolerating these conditions. When they are the optimum conditions for me.


    Source date (UTC): 2024-11-21 00:56:33 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1859399089173237760

  • (Diary – “Crushes”) Someone is questioning who our crushes were growing up. And

    (Diary – “Crushes”)
    Someone is questioning who our crushes were growing up. And oddly, I don’t really have any. Possibly because the real girls and women in my life were a sufficient distraction. I definitely had a crush on maureen mccormick in the early seventies. Lindsay wagner was was a symbol of beauty. I felt a romantic appreciation for Michelle Pfeiffer in Ladyhawke. Sean Young in Bladerunner. And I did a lot of research on the subject of beauty since studying art in college. (it’s simple.) I have no attraction to Charlize Theron because of her personality, but in beauty but she’s up there with Grace Kelly who is morphologically perfect. I feel a desperate need to take care of Julie Benz – so adorable. Same for Emilie de Ravin is biologically perfect in body and soul. I think Amy Adams is the perfect woman all around – bring her home to mom and dad. In my gene pool I adore Sidse Babett Knudsen. I’d like to be worthy of an Anne Hathaway – but that’s a statement about me. But most of all I love smart and capable women like Sanna Marin and especially Ursula Von Der Leyen.
    I’ve been so lucky with the real women in my life there isn’t a lot of room for wishing anything more. But it’s interesting to think about beauty over a lifetime, and find the constants.
    So like many posts that advocate for recreational thought provoking, this one … well it made me happy to think about. πŸ˜‰


    Source date (UTC): 2024-11-20 23:41:17 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1859381533653770240

  • So is plague. So what?

    So is plague. So what?


    Source date (UTC): 2024-11-20 23:07:42 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1859373082143752633

    Reply addressees: @_GallusGallus_ @DanielB02277937 @GeneralVeritass @VDHanson

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1859347548504457680

  • RT @NoahRevoy: @ThrillaRilla369 I’ve got a few good ones for you: @curtdoolittle

    RT @NoahRevoy: @ThrillaRilla369 I’ve got a few good ones for you:

    @curtdoolittle
    @bierlingm
    @ThruTheHayes
    @LukeWeinhagen
    @bryanbrey
    @Th…


    Source date (UTC): 2024-11-20 23:07:04 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1859372919891374507

  • Nate, Thank you. But you know, we live in a world created by ‘scribblers’ like A

    Nate,
    Thank you.
    But you know, we live in a world created by ‘scribblers’ like Aristotle, Aquinas, Locke, Smith, Hume, The Founders, Kant, Darwin, Menger, Nietzsche, Popper, and Hayek. Everything we think and speak is organized by those people and many others. I have some aware ness that what I am doing is in the same category of revolutionary thought that will affect mankind as have others before me.
    But my work is non-trivial. It is quite a bit of effort. I can see the effect it has on people who learn it. And I have come to realize that the combination of my work and AI’s may solve one of the great problems of modernity -alienation.
    But, as how to make it digestible for the masses, I have found that rather difficult. And to some degree I rely on Rudyard (@Whatifalthist) to distribute what is relevant for him and in his interest to make use of. And my work does filter through the conservative and libertarian spaces although slowly and without recognition.
    I agree that once I’ve published at least the first volume that we can begin promoting my work. However, our strategy and my opinion, is that we must publish our work on the law, constitution, and policy reforms before the public can comprehend my work. There is no need for them to understand the depth of it. There is however need and value for them to understand ‘what went wrong’, the basic principles, the reforms we’re suggesting, and how we can make the world a better place for all of us – without repeating another sedition against our civilization by the feminine means of warfare.

    Thank you for your support and care.
    It matters to me.
    Hugs

    Reply addressees: @russianbot29462


    Source date (UTC): 2024-11-20 21:01:30 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1859341322458628097

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1859336854417572178