[No text content]
Source date (UTC): 2025-12-26 11:16:23 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2004511603736412574
Author: Curt Doolittle
-
My job is to identify the truth under full accounting of causes and consequences
My job is to identify the truth under full accounting of causes and consequences regardless of whether we like the truth or not. I serve the highest possible moral purpose: how do we reduce conflict and promote cooperation and its returns despite the impact on our feelings. You don’t by denying and thus lying.
Source date (UTC): 2025-12-26 07:17:34 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2004451503604748446
-
(Worth Watching) @BobMurphyEcon , @ProfSteveKeen Great Video
(Worth Watching)
@BobMurphyEcon
,
@ProfSteveKeenGreat Video
Source date (UTC): 2025-12-26 01:15:26 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2004360371642200533
-
True. Look at the origins of the lawfare in the USA. If you can stomach the volu
True. Look at the origins of the lawfare in the USA.
If you can stomach the volume of detail in the impact of Jewish intellectuals read Kevin Macdonald’s series including the People Who Shall Dwell Alone, and the heavily suppressed Culture of Critique.
If you want an unbiased view read Stephen Hicks’ Explaining Postmodernism.
If you want to higher level view read Ricardo Duchesne’s The Uniqueness of Western Civilization.
If you want world context, read Huntington’s Clash of Civilizations and our present return to it’s dominance.
My work on group evolutionary strategies and their cognitive and biological origins is almost ready for publication, but much of my thinking is publicly available.
Source date (UTC): 2025-12-26 01:10:43 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2004359186377748725
-
Untitled
[No text content]
Source date (UTC): 2025-12-25 20:49:31 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2004293453342298532
-
Who created the red lines?
Who created the red lines?
Source date (UTC): 2025-12-24 23:53:24 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2003977339986981046
-
ANOTHER THOUGHT OF THE DAY There is a tendency of humans, illustrated by both le
ANOTHER THOUGHT OF THE DAY
There is a tendency of humans, illustrated by both left center and right, that attempts to reduce causality to a single dimension whether left (psychological-non-adaptive), center (capacity-practical), right (responsibility-adaptive), or to claim relativism because of causal density they can neither undersand nor resist falsification of their priors. Instead, ‘adults’ so to speak, think in systems of causal dimensions that seek some sort of equilibrium. In my understanding failure to teach behavioral economics incrementally in grade and high-school – which is value neutral – is the greatest source of ignorance among the general population, even if, likewise, mathiness is the greatest source of ignorance in the hard sciences and the spillover has affected all other sciences.
Source date (UTC): 2025-12-24 22:26:20 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2003955428946792496
-
NOTE FOR ALL: There is a relationship between culture and genome that is self-re
NOTE FOR ALL: There is a relationship between culture and genome that is self-reinforcing, but mostly in the direction of neotenic evolution (domestication syndrome). So the [R1b > R1a > I] cline have been co-evolving for millennia – at least since the end of the ice age.
We might argue that genome is just a proxy for civilization because civilizations reflect the demands of their genetic distributions, and the primary axis of genetic distribution in both sexual rate and depth of maturity, sexual dimorphism, temperament (personality) and intelligence.
But all that would mean is that it’s the distribution of the population under that culture evolved under that genome evolved under that degree of neotenic evolution, made possible by isolation and sub-speciation.
This is the correct explanation of the correlation of integration possibility rather than purely attributing it to genetics.
When we account for the entire sequence we see causal clarity and ends the criticism of reliance on genetic determinism.
Source date (UTC): 2025-12-24 22:20:37 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2003953988144930884
-
Not without an argument it isn’t. It’s an accusation without substantiation. It’
Not without an argument it isn’t. It’s an accusation without substantiation.
It’s also extremely unlikely that I’m wrong. I may have been incomplete because it’s a post on a holiday and I’m in a rush, but I don’t do ‘wrong’ almost ever. It’s my job to make up for the rest of you….
Source date (UTC): 2025-12-24 22:09:21 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2003951152648671624
-
Not an argument
Not an argument.
Source date (UTC): 2025-12-24 22:07:55 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2003950793242894508
