Author: Curt Doolittle

Again. While you’re using more detailed explanation, this is just another version of the same argument made by Chris Langan, and god knows how many people before him.

More specifically, assuming the sequence of arguments are true (which are assumptions but not unworthy assumptions) this merely states that there are fundamental laws of deterministic behavior in this (or any) universe that result in some analogy to operational computation.

In other words, yes, the universe very likely follows a fixed set of categories (entities), dimensions, and operations. In fact we have no evidence otherwise.

But, any attempt to anthropomorphize this is just that: fictionalism (lying). One cannot testify to it.

As such you could make the argument that the universe contains laws and that as such we can anthropomorphize the universe for human mental consumption. Which was one of the permutations I listed. But it is just a convenient fiction for providing false legitimacy to children and the dim, until they can master all the subsequent abstractions to make non-fictional claims and conclusions.

There is no demand (outside the universe) for external organization of these rules since pressure, spin, polarity, harmonics and quanta that result, produce all resulting categories and operations. (which is precisely what I argue in our forthcoming book on the logic of evolutionary computation.). And there is no reason to imagine (see Wolfram) that any other set of rules would survive evolutionary computation. Those that exist are those that survive. It doesn’t appear that variations in pressure (energy) would alter those properties.

So, assuming all the theorized physical processes you listed are correct, that conveys no truth value in any dimension on the claim of god.

Reply addressees: @njalbertini