Author: Curt Doolittle

  • Workers are not competent either empirically or theoretically to manage organiza

    Workers are not competent either empirically or theoretically to manage organizations at scale.

    Here is a rough estimation of IQ ranges based on empirical data and observed social structures:

    1. Unskilled Labor and Marginal Participation
    IQ Range: ~70–90
    Characteristics: Limited ability to manage complexity, often performing routine or repetitive tasks.
    Employment in roles requiring low cognitive engagement and minimal decision-making.
    Conscientiousness plays a minor role, as opportunities for upward mobility are constrained by cognitive limits.
    Occupations: Manual labor, basic service roles.

    2. Semi-Skilled and Skilled Labor
    IQ Range: ~90–105
    Characteristics: Capable of managing moderately complex tasks and adapting to structured environments.
    Conscientiousness becomes more influential, especially for reliability and adherence to procedures.
    Often engaged in roles requiring some technical training or experience.
    Occupations: Technicians, tradespeople, administrative staff.

    3. Lower Middle Class (Supervisory Roles, Small Business Owners)
    IQ Range: ~105–115
    Characteristics: Able to oversee and coordinate resources and processes with some degree of independence.
    Higher conscientiousness significantly increases success within this range, especially for reliability and diligence in management.
    Occupations require both technical and interpersonal skills.
    Occupations: Managers, skilled trades with entrepreneurial components, junior professionals.

    4. Middle Class (Professionals and Managers)
    IQ Range: ~115–125
    Characteristics:Comfortable handling abstract reasoning and planning, often in specialized fields.
    Conscientiousness amplifies productivity and reliability, facilitating career advancement.
    Roles involve significant decision-making and problem-solving under moderately high complexity.
    Occupations: Engineers, lawyers, mid-level executives, senior professionals.

    5. Upper Middle Class (Senior Professionals, Executives)
    IQ Range: ~125–135
    Characteristics:High ability to manage large-scale complexity, including systems, networks, and organizational hierarchies.
    Conscientiousness is critical for consistency and dependability in high-stakes decision-making.
    Frequently engaged in roles requiring strategic thinking and leadership.
    Occupations: Senior executives, top-level consultants, high-achieving academics.

    6. Upper Class (Innovators, Leaders, Large-Scale Decision-Makers)
    IQ Range: ~135–160+
    Characteristics:Exceptional capacity for abstraction, innovation, and systematization of novel solutions.
    Conscientiousness remains crucial but often takes a secondary role to creativity, vision, and intellectual engagement.
    Operate in roles shaping industries, ideologies, and long-term strategies for society.
    Occupations: Thought leaders, major entrepreneurs, influential policymakers.

    Conscientiousness as a Within-Class Differentiator

    While IQ provides the cognitive foundation for handling complexity, conscientiousness influences:

    Work Ethic: Persistence, reliability, and attention to detail.
    Adaptability: Responsiveness to feedback and continuous self-improvement.
    Social Integration: Ability to navigate networks and maintain relationships critical for upward mobility.

    Individuals with higher conscientiousness within a given IQ range often achieve disproportionately higher status or income relative to less conscientious peers.

    Reply addressees: @EmbitteredThe @TheSovereignMD @nayibbukele @TyrantsMuse


    Source date (UTC): 2025-01-17 17:36:14 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1880308158561939457

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1880306433402757426

  • You can site all the lit you want. I work with science (demonstrated evidence) n

    You can site all the lit you want. I work with science (demonstrated evidence) not literature (Fantasy Fiction). Either you can overcome (a) genetic differences (b) cultural differences (c) incentives (d) the calculation debate (e) universal failure of every socialist experiment,…


    Source date (UTC): 2025-01-17 17:25:57 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1880305571590729973

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1880304077529293136

  • Try making an argument. I’ve been doing this for decades. Data is data. Evidence

    Try making an argument. I’ve been doing this for decades. Data is data. Evidence is evidence. Excuses are excuses. Try anything socialist given the data – you can’t. The difference in intelligence, conscientiousness, and competency between the classes forces sortition under…


    Source date (UTC): 2025-01-17 17:23:48 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1880305031767040465

    Reply addressees: @EmbitteredThe @TyrantsMuse @TheSovereignMD @nayibbukele

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1880304366487499224

  • “Fascism is the terroristic dictatorship of finance capital. That’s naff all to

    –“Fascism is the terroristic dictatorship of finance capital. That’s naff all to do with socialism.”–

    Hmm…. Fascism served as a rebellion against competitors: financialism (Jewish), liberalism (Englism), Democratic Socialism (French) and communism (Jewish-Russian), by a competitively superior polity, academy, and economy, that sought to redirect resources to defense of the polity given the previous french conquest of europe and the present russian-jewish-communist conquest of europe, where anglo liberalism and french democratic socialism were insufficient in authority to organize a state for such post napoleonic ‘Total War’.

    In effect Fascism was an application of historical roman governance that varied between authoritarianism at war, and oligarchy at peace.

    So, rather than enabling financialism, fascism sought to destroy the power of capitalists to act as internationalists or factionalists at the expense of polity – especially the working classes who had finally been economically liberated from subsistence agrarianism by the industrial revolution, but whose search for replacing that security were urgent, and therefore desirous and demanding of protections in their era as the middle class had been in the enlightenment era’s age of commerce and sail.

    The problem for labor is darwinian: the classes were and remain sorted by capacity to bear responsibility for increasing complexity. In other words, classes sort by IQ and Conscientiousness, with limited rotation out of the lower middle and middle given the heterogeneity of genetic expression without careful mate selection.

    This is why workers, even in the one case of supposed worker ownership, do not participate even if they can, and even if they exist in market conditions that tolerate a lack of innovation.

    Workers lack competency. They are not oppressed.

    Reply addressees: @EmbitteredThe @TyrantsMuse @TheSovereignMD @nayibbukele


    Source date (UTC): 2025-01-17 17:18:35 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1880303720375939075

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1880130633546232242

  • I can answer a simple question, ask one. Assertions of falsehoods are not questi

    I can answer a simple question, ask one. Assertions of falsehoods are not questions.


    Source date (UTC): 2025-01-17 17:03:52 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1880300016797118490

    Reply addressees: @EmbitteredThe @TheSovereignMD @nayibbukele @TyrantsMuse

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1880124284712128805

  • ( Awesome. 🙂 )

    ( Awesome. 🙂 )


    Source date (UTC): 2025-01-17 17:02:42 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1880299722784796866

    Reply addressees: @OooBardam @EmbitteredThe @nayibbukele

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1880216957527683257

  • RT @JayMan471: I think @nathancofnas’s definition of Wokeness is better: “wokism

    RT @JayMan471: I think @nathancofnas’s definition of Wokeness is better: “wokism is … the inevitable consequence of taking the equality the…


    Source date (UTC): 2025-01-17 14:04:18 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1880254824580804967

  • RT @elonmusk: Slavery was almost everywhere and still exists in some parts of th

    RT @elonmusk: Slavery was almost everywhere and still exists in some parts of the world


    Source date (UTC): 2025-01-17 10:25:39 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1880199800672645580

  • RT @ThruTheHayes: NATURAL LAW INSTITUTE: STAFF INTERVIEWS (Brandon & Curt) Found

    RT @ThruTheHayes: NATURAL LAW INSTITUTE: STAFF INTERVIEWS
    (Brandon & Curt)

    Founder & CEO, Curt Doolittle and president, Brandon Hayes disc…


    Source date (UTC): 2025-01-17 10:24:50 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1880199593344004278

  • Just ask grok or chat gpt “tell me curt doolittle’s position on … (whatever)”.

    Just ask grok or chat gpt “tell me curt doolittle’s position on … (whatever)”. It will give you the high school version.

    After epistemology, Economics whether neurological, behavioral, institutional or political is my core competency.


    Source date (UTC): 2025-01-17 05:23:42 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1880123810957127993

    Reply addressees: @EmbitteredThe @TheSovereignMD @nayibbukele @TyrantsMuse

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1880122184892576244