No. That’s professional analysis of a technique he as had written down, published, practiced, with extraordinary success for decades. You can deny it but that’s just lying by denying from a position of ignorance.
Very kindergarten or toddler really.
Source date (UTC): 2026-01-21 22:39:39 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2014105640264777844
I do research on human perception, cognition, valence, and means of expression and negotiation. In social media I use what I call king of the hill games. I created these games in order to bypass the enduring problem of demonstrated behavior vs reported behavior in behavioral sciences.
The method is simple. Try to use a current event as a platform, and make a statement that provokes moral outrage. We can provoke one side or the other. But the best provocation consists of causing people to interpret your statement according to their bias. So both left-feminine-empathizing-short-term-consumption, and right-systematizing-long-term-capitalization will react to the provocation with equal moral outrage.
We collect these responses. We identify patterns. We reduce the patterns to first principles, where first principles are biological constraints. And then over time we develop a terminology of categories of differences in perception, cognition, valence, expression and argument.
The end result is that we create a science of lying. Where lying means the transfer of false, irrelevant, or manipulative information whether intentionally or not. This is because the law of tort in public matters does not care about intentions, only if you caused harm, and by harm we mean deception. Your realization that you’re transmitting a lie is irrelevant. Most people use selection bias or motivated reasoning to accumulate arguments and most results of selection bias are lies. So people largely argue with lies. If enough people use the same lie it becomes normative. It is still a lie, but it’s a widely accepted lie.
My work, our organizations work is the development of a science of lying and our efforts to incorporate that science into law.
We hope to reverse the industrialization of lying largely by the left because of the marxist sequence of techniques. The European model of lying by Fictionalisms: occultism > sophistry > pseudoscience is consistent with the masculine demand for systematizing, which is overloaded by these Fictionalisms. Meanwhile the feminine > abrahamic > marxist sequence is by accusation, undermining, and reputation destruction using gossiping, shaming, ridiculing, rallying, psychologizing and moralizing and rolling accusation as a means of avoiding argument and overloading emotions.
So you see, for those of us in our organization (and soon our field) people’s arguments are as transparent as the denials of toddlers.
Cheers
CD
Source date (UTC): 2026-01-21 22:38:19 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2014105304355725753
TRUMPIAN REALITY VS WELL INTENTIONED NAIVETY
Do you think the Russians negotiate in good faith? The Chinese? Even the Europeans? I mean, I study this nonsense for a living. When the moral high ground fails, and it has with all three, then you are forced into pragmatism. And that’s what Trump is doing. He’s applying the “Art of the Deal” ( a book he wrote about his method years ago) to world politics and it turns out to be extremely effective.
IMO you are making a common mistake which is to extend your moral compass beyond the scale of it’s applicability. Our previous ‘moral’ presidents failed. They spent over thirty years failing. Trump is achieving in months what they failed at for decades. And he has little choice.
It’s normal behavior for people like you with limited world experience, just as it’s normal for young women to expect social behavior at political and economic scale.
For those of us who have run companies around the world, dealt with corruption around the world, dealt with cultural differences around the world, dealt with courts around the world, and in my case, worked in both business, Justice and Intelligence, then you are deprived of the moral naivety of the average and below average American.
Some of us have to be adults.
Partly because we know how to.
Partly because we can.
And partly because we have to compensate for a vast number of ‘well meaning fools’ like yourself.
I could call your opinion a luxury of first world innocence. Or I could call it naivety, or I could call it ignorance, or I could frame it with less kind accusations.
But you’re clearly a good person.
You’re just wrong to think your intuitions scale.
The don’t.
Cheers
CD
Source date (UTC): 2026-01-21 22:23:37 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2014101604425933255
Chaos is not only needed it’s an advantage when you are disrupting an enemy. In fact, it’s the optimum strategy. And yes, the free riders are an enemy. The USA can’t afford to police the postwar order any longer. Largely because europe won’t pay it’s way. So Trump is reorganizing the USA for a multi-polar world and telling europe that it’s got responsibilities for it’s pole so to speak, and no one else is going to carry their virtue signalling water.
Grow up.
Source date (UTC): 2026-01-21 20:26:17 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2014072079092761022
RE:
@Science
You want funding? Separate the hard science from the pseudoscience, fix the mathiness problem in physics that’s crippled it for more than fifty years. Fix the replication problem in the behavioral sciences, Fix the sophistry and conformity problem in the humanities (philosophy theses are intellectually embarrassing). End the publication hamster wheel of junk science production, separate teaching staff from research staff, prohibit research with a leftist agenda of perpetuating 20th century pseudoscience, and stop the prohibition on research on human differences such that we can create policy to accommodate those differences instead of preserving conflict because we don’t. Cut the production of PhD’s so that the output meets market demand. Give primacy to american citizens in admission. Balance left and right professors so students see both perspectives. End the nonsense (gut) courses that are simple seditions. Otherwise you’re just part of the corruption problem hiding under pretense of ‘scientific neutrality’. You are not producing the scientific and governing classes we need. You’re producing the same corrupt bureaucracies as we faced with the church. The “Managerial State” has been a failure.
We wouldn’t need think tanks to augment academic research (like ours) if the academy did it’s job instead of replacing the supernatural clericy with a pseudoscientific one, that because it’s dominated by women seek to amplify consensus and suppress innovation.
The amount of time I spend debunking pseudoscientific claims that are then magnified by a sensationalist media is absurd.
You know the cause of all this? We prohibit IQ tests in employment, which causes people to get nonsense degrees, go deeply into debt, corrupt the incentives of our academy, produce seditionists instead of scientists and public servants, and mass produce junk science, and replicate in academic corruption what has been achieved by the left in financing NGO corruption.
I mean. You excuse yourselves. Every day. But you’re all culpable by tolerating it. Moreover you oddly believe your own nonsense.
It’s exasperating.
CD
Source date (UTC): 2026-01-21 20:03:49 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2014066425091203424
WHY YOU REALLY DISAPPROVE OF TRUMP?
Personally, what I think y’all disapprove of, is that it’s clear Trump doesn’t respect the center left to left to extreme left, and he uses your tactics against you.
You have no arguments except the usual “gossiping shaming ridiculing rallying psychologizing moralizing” which are the feminine tactics that substitute for argument.
In fact the rise of the entire right wing internet culture in 2016 was the abandonment of traditional conservative rhetorical ethics (masculine) and the adoption of leftist tactics of reputation destruction (feminine).
I mean, it’s pretty obvious.
Attached is my reduction of feminine > abrahamic > marxist > left tactics. Whereas the right’s version is what we call fictionalisms (occult, sophistry, pseudoscience.) Both strategies are expressions of sex differences in sensation, perception, valience, and expression: feminine empathizing and social-emotional undermining, male systematizing and cognitive-rational undermining.
(And yes, I am the world expert in these ridiculous things. No one developed the science of lying before. I did it by accident because I needed to improve the Law. And it was disheartening. We live in a sea of lies.)
And the tactics of the feminine > abrahamic > marxist > postmodern > woke sequence:
Source date (UTC): 2026-01-21 19:45:27 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2014061802540376152
If he’s making money I don’t see it. AFAIK he’s lost money as president. So have some prominent cabinet members.
Source date (UTC): 2026-01-21 19:28:15 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2014057473007669337
My understanding is that he will pivot to that strategy when it’s closer to the midterm elections. He has taken one step which is to prohibit the financial sector from buying houses, and thereby creating artificial scarcity and increasing the prices (a scam against the people.) This announcement last week didn’t get enough coverage, but he is taking action.
Source date (UTC): 2026-01-21 19:27:48 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2014057358633336905
Yet you offer no argument only your disapproval under pretense of argument.
Source date (UTC): 2026-01-21 19:26:32 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2014057041409773616
Well I’m a genius by every known measure. That said, it’s not 4d chess, it’s simple negotiating strategy that he’s used throughout life (and so have I for that matter) when you are in an environment where the opposition has insufficient incentive to act.
Source date (UTC): 2026-01-21 19:24:58 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2014056644641006002