Author: Curt Doolittle

  • RT @NoahRevoy: The men call me a misandrist. The women call me a misogynist. All

    RT @NoahRevoy: The men call me a misandrist.
    The women call me a misogynist.

    All I’m doing is telling the truth—and the truth doesn’t care…


    Source date (UTC): 2025-03-25 01:13:39 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1904340872659120158

  • (NLI HUMOR) Eric is wrestling with a bit of code that’s parsing Volume 2. And fo

    (NLI HUMOR)
    Eric is wrestling with a bit of code that’s parsing Volume 2. And for some reason pronoun selector is resolving “It” to “Eric”.

    Eric has never given me, either of his wives, or anyone else, any evidence of “IT-ness”. As far as I know he has only one set of parts, and an entirely masculine cognitive structure. (And he’s a lot bigger than I am. lol)

    You might not be able to appreciate the humor here without knowing eric and his absolutely inviolable stoicism, rigorous masculine reason, and recreational activities like white water rafting, skiiing, and running a ranch. ;). lol

    I love my job. I’m surrounded by amazing people who put up with my foolishness. 😉


    Source date (UTC): 2025-03-25 01:10:44 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1904340136445521920

  • THE SEX DIFFERENCES MIRROR (Part 1) Given your research premise that sex-specifi

    THE SEX DIFFERENCES MIRROR (Part 1)

    Given your research premise that sex-specific behavioral expressions often have approximate mirror forms in the other sex—such as female oppression narratives versus male conspiracy narratives—there are several bimodal behaviors worth investigating to expand your list.

    These behaviors reflect how each sex navigates social dynamics, expresses agency, or responds to challenges, often in complementary or contrasting ways.

    Below, I’ve outlined a range of potential bimodal expressions you could explore, each with examples of how they manifest differently yet mirror each other across sexes.

    1. Dominance vs. Submission in Social Interactions

    Male Dominance: Men often express dominance through direct means, such as physical posturing, overt competition, or asserting control in leadership roles.
    Female Mirror (Submission/Indirect Dominance): Women may navigate social hierarchies more indirectly, using strategies like coalition-building or relational influence, which can mirror male dominance by achieving similar ends through subtler means.
    Male Mirror (Submission): Men might show submission by deferring to authority or taking supportive roles in group settings, reflecting a counterpart to female indirect strategies.
    This area highlights how dominance and submission can flip or adapt across sexes depending on context, offering a rich field for investigation.

    2. Risk-Taking vs. Risk-Aversion

    Male Risk-Taking: Men are frequently associated with physical or financial risks, such as engaging in extreme sports or speculative investments.
    Female Mirror (Risk-Aversion or Relational Risk): Women may exhibit risk-aversion in these areas but take risks in social or relational domains, like initiating tough conversations or defying norms, mirroring male risk-taking in a different sphere.
    Male Mirror (Risk-Aversion): Men might avoid risks in emotional contexts, such as shying away from vulnerability, which parallels female relational risk-taking.
    Investigating risk behaviors could reveal how each sex balances boldness and caution in distinct yet mirrored ways.

    3. Emotional Expression vs. Suppression

    Female Emotional Expression: Women are often socialized to openly express emotions, especially empathy or sadness, as a form of connection.
    Male Mirror (Suppression/Action-Based Expression): Men may suppress emotions to align with ideals of strength, expressing them instead through actions like anger or problem-solving, mirroring female openness in a socially acceptable form.
    Female Mirror (Suppression): Women might suppress emotions in competitive or professional settings to appear strong, paralleling male suppression.
    This bimodal pair could uncover how emotional regulation reflects societal expectations and mirrors across sexes.

    4. Nurturing vs. Protective Behaviors

    Female Nurturing: Women are traditionally linked to caregiving and emotional support, especially in family roles.
    Male Mirror (Protective Nurturing): Men may express nurturing through protective actions, like ensuring physical or financial security, which mirrors female caregiving in a practical form.
    Female Mirror (Protective): Women might take on protective roles, such as defending their social or familial groups, reflecting male protectiveness.
    Parenting or caregiving contexts could provide concrete examples of these mirrored behaviors.

    5. Competition vs. Cooperation

    Male Competition: Men often engage in direct competition, such as in sports or career advancement, emphasizing individual achievement.
    Female Mirror (Cooperation): Women may prioritize cooperation and group harmony, such as in team-building or community efforts, mirroring male competition by fostering collective success.
    Male Mirror (Cooperation): Men might cooperate within competitive settings, like team sports or military units, paralleling female cooperation.
    This contrast could show how competitive and cooperative instincts mirror each other in group dynamics.

    6. Status-Seeking vs. Affiliation-Seeking

    Male Status-Seeking: Men often pursue status through tangible achievements, such as wealth or recognition.
    Female Mirror (Affiliation-Seeking): Women may seek status through relationships or social networks, mirroring male status-seeking in a relational form.
    Male Mirror (Affiliation): Men might build affiliations through loyalty to groups or causes, reflecting female strategies.

    Exploring status and affiliation could highlight how each sex achieves influence in mirrored ways.

    7. Aggression vs. Passive Aggression

    Male Aggression: Men are often associated with direct aggression, whether physical or verbal, as a display of power.
    Female Mirror (Passive Aggression): Women may use indirect aggression, like gossip or social exclusion, mirroring male aggression in a less confrontational form.
    Male Mirror (Passive Aggression): Men might employ passive-aggressive tactics, such as sarcasm or avoidance, in situations where direct aggression isn’t viable, paralleling female strategies.
    This pair could reveal how aggression manifests differently yet mirrors across sexes.

    8. Independence vs. Interdependence

    Male Independence: Men are often encouraged to value autonomy and self-reliance.
    Female Mirror (Interdependence): Women may emphasize communal support and interdependence, mirroring male independence by relying on collective strength.
    Male Mirror (Interdependence): Men might show interdependence through loyalty to male groups or mentors, reflecting female interdependence.
    This bimodal behavior could explore how autonomy and connection balance across sexes.

    9. Problem-Solving vs. Emotional Support

    Male Problem-Solving: Men often focus on offering practical solutions to challenges.
    Female Mirror (Emotional Support): Women may provide empathy or emotional validation, mirroring male problem-solving by addressing the emotional side of issues.
    Male Mirror (Emotional Support): Men might offer support through actions or presence rather than words, paralleling female emotional support.
    This area could show how each sex approaches helping others in mirrored forms.

    10. Leadership Styles

    Male Leadership: Men often lead with assertiveness and a focus on tasks or outcomes.
    Female Mirror (Collaborative Leadership): Women may lead through collaboration and relationship-building, mirroring male leadership in a relational style.
    Male Mirror (Collaborative): Men might adopt collaborative approaches in creative or team-based settings, reflecting female leadership.
    Leadership differences could provide insight into how authority is expressed and mirrored.


    Source date (UTC): 2025-03-25 01:03:13 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1904338245107974146

  • We need more crushes. We can’t all have a crush on you Aunmarie. It would lead t

    We need more crushes. We can’t all have a crush on you Aunmarie. It would lead to rioting in the streets. 😉 lol -hugs.


    Source date (UTC): 2025-03-24 23:39:12 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1904317104708600309

    Reply addressees: @auny_marie

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1904312501279306132

  • RT @Kitch11154385: @williameijer @WalterIII @curtdoolittle Men demand competence

    RT @Kitch11154385: @williameijer @WalterIII @curtdoolittle Men demand competence, women demand conformity.


    Source date (UTC): 2025-03-24 23:38:26 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1904316911237972069

  • Is it ok if I have a mad crush on Karoline Leavitt? I love smart competent women

    Is it ok if I have a mad crush on Karoline Leavitt?

    I love smart competent women. 🙂


    Source date (UTC): 2025-03-24 19:22:26 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1904252487248605580

  • I am correct and there is no synthetic historian who would disagree with me

    I am correct and there is no synthetic historian who would disagree with me.


    Source date (UTC): 2025-03-24 18:39:22 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1904241647329968183

    Reply addressees: @ProductionMan @MikeChardin

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1904240440809078818

  • No, I am teaching you the method of argument by unambiguous chains of causation

    No, I am teaching you the method of argument by unambiguous chains of causation instead of pretense of argument justified by selective analogy.

    Either you are knowledgeable enough to make an argument from first principles (first causes) and to trace the evolution of these ideas across time, or you are just ‘fitting’ examples to justify your hypothesis.

    You are a good person. I can easily detect that. But my job is the truth whether we like it or not.

    The truth is that and any good that came to be under the church was the good that would arise from any government at all, just as the common law arose under the Romans. The only difference is whether it’s empirical (european) or a lie (semitic abrahamic).

    The church destroyed knowledge that took the return of the muslims fleeing from fundamentalism to return that knowledge to europe. Which,, in 1200 started our recovery immediately, and despite the plague, gave us literacy and the printing press within a few generations, science within a few more, and the agrarian then industrial revolution in a few more.

    Abrahamism is a cancer.

    Reply addressees: @ProductionMan @MikeChardin


    Source date (UTC): 2025-03-24 18:38:46 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1904241494506307584

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1904240128333418638

  • Everything, literally everything the church claims, just as they converted natur

    Everything, literally everything the church claims, just as they converted natural law to divine law, and greek ethics to christian ethics, is just an authoritarian supernatural retread to appeal to the ignorant and petty underclasses who could not obtain status by merit in aristocratic european civ. The church destroyed the schools, the philosophers, their writings, the arts, and the monuments of europe, just as today’s leftists destroy education, history, law. There is no difference. The weaponization of the weak and unable and cowardly – and IRRESPONSIBLe, against the strong, and able, and brave – and RESPONSIBLE. The abrahamic religions are a cancer of ignorance. Had stoicism and one of the movements akin to Sol Invictus (which jesus is a copy of) survived, the west might never have had a dark age, and might have hit the industrial revolution by the time of the muslim conquests that destroyed the trade of the old world.

    Reply addressees: @ProductionMan @MikeChardin


    Source date (UTC): 2025-03-24 18:30:33 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1904239430250151936

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1904233074382233606

  • RT @curtdoolittle: @BlakeAn77455669 @ProductionMan @MikeChardin It’s european. E

    RT @curtdoolittle: @BlakeAn77455669 @ProductionMan @MikeChardin It’s european. European civ can fight today and ally tomorrow. Always been…


    Source date (UTC): 2025-03-24 18:25:10 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1904238071950069836