@sjpaparo Saw you testifying today. Thank you for your devotion and efforts. You’re a great leader.
Source date (UTC): 2025-04-12 20:35:34 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1911156261066068058
@sjpaparo Saw you testifying today. Thank you for your devotion and efforts. You’re a great leader.
Source date (UTC): 2025-04-12 20:35:34 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1911156261066068058
Source date (UTC): 2025-04-12 19:38:32 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1911141906165469595
(NLI)
Terminology: Lawful (Natural) vs Legal (Declared).
“In my work on natural law I would like to separate ‘according to natural law (discovered)’ from ‘according to legislative law (made)’. I have considered disambiguating the discovered from made by dividing between lawful and legal. It’s acceptable to modify existing definitions of these terms because I often disambiguate terms using our glossary. So mostly, I’m concerned with narrowing the definition of terms such that they ease the burden of neologisms on the reader. As such it’s really a question of whether such disambiguation practical given the existing use of the terms.”
Assigning “lawful” to natural law and “legal” to legislative law leverages existing connotations. “Lawful” aligns with the timeless, moral undertones of natural law (e.g., “just and lawful”), while “legal” fits the constructed, procedural nature of statutes (e.g., “legal technicality”). A glossary can reinforce this.
“Lawful: Commonly means “conforming to the law” or “permitted by law,” often with a moral or ethical connotation (e.g., “lawful conduct”). It’s tied to legitimacy and sometimes implies alignment with higher principles, which could resonate with natural law.
Legal: Typically refers to what is established or authorized by statutory or codified law (e.g., “legal contract”). It’s more technical, tied to specific jurisdictions and human-made systems.”
The distinction works across contexts (ethics, law, policy), as both terms are already used broadly. You can apply them to historical analysis (e.g., “Roman lawful principles vs. imperial legal codes”) or modern debates (e.g., “lawful rights vs. legal privileges”).
“I will go ahead with lawful vs legal because of the moral association and use “Lawful (natural, discovered) vs Legal (political, created)” in frequent repetition.
That’s a solid plan. Using “Lawful (natural, discovered) vs. Legal (political, created)” with frequent repetition will reinforce the distinction and leverage the moral weight of “lawful” effectively. It’s clear, concise, and ties directly to your goal of separating natural and legislative law.
Source date (UTC): 2025-04-11 20:13:34 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1910788334882086912
re: “life is not fundamental,” I don’t understand how you’re drawing that conclusion?
Source date (UTC): 2025-04-11 07:54:03 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1910602230014550187
Reply addressees: @zbingeldac @Sara_Imari
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1910591971489440222
RT @ShadowofEzra: President Donald Trump revealed to the press that the United States has secret weapons no one has ever heard of.
He conf…
Source date (UTC): 2025-04-11 04:39:49 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1910553348241317913
FINALLY!!!!! And earlier than expected!!! One more obstacle down.
cc:@NatLawInstitute https://twitter.com/sama/status/1910380643772665873
Source date (UTC): 2025-04-11 04:38:50 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1910553103302353016
RT @sama: we have greatly improved memory in chatgpt–it can now reference all your past conversations!
this is a surprisingly great featu…
Source date (UTC): 2025-04-11 04:37:36 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1910552791162249397
RT @Alkibiades_: There is a metapolitical rift building within the right — between what I would call the Civil Right and the Uncivil Right.…
Source date (UTC): 2025-04-11 04:37:22 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1910552730739134966
Thats not evdence trump didnt expect it, only tht this individual didn’t. Read the paper by the architect of this strategy.
Source date (UTC): 2025-04-10 22:44:03 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1910463817198579739
Reply addressees: @MotivationSober @elonmusk @realDonaldTrump
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1910463253857075339
For fellow wayfinding nerds… https://twitter.com/NatureNeuro/status/1907786659556409515
Source date (UTC): 2025-04-10 22:35:10 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1910461582800499122