RT @elonmusk: Yes
Source date (UTC): 2025-04-23 02:17:30 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1914866186598436900
RT @elonmusk: Yes
Source date (UTC): 2025-04-23 02:17:30 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1914866186598436900
I dunno about that. In my case it’s more about the behavior that generated the circumstance on one hand (presumptions) and the theories that follow (presumptions) that fascinate me. “How do people think about these things?” That’s what I find interesting.
Personally? The stuff that ‘bothers’ me is … the purely evil. Like that psycho Bryan Kohberger who killed a group of young people in the northwest a year or two ago. It’s just randomness out of nowhere. Without reason. The time and energy to spin up that much fked-up in one head is just … that’s just not good. Human time bombs walking around with enough IQ points to hide it. Not good.
On the other hand …I love horror movies. 😉 lol
Reply addressees: @partymember55
Source date (UTC): 2025-04-23 02:09:08 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1914864084870422529
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1914853152093819210
—“Curt: Do you have an interest in any real-life mystery stories?”—
I do when I want to fall asleep at night. 😉 Which is the only time I spend on such things. But, yes, I’m interested in edge-cases in general (in fact that’s what I study, right?) So as edge cases they’re fascinating.
My wife once said “everything interesting happens at the edges” and I thought it was one of the best little quotable insights. We look for knowledge in regularities but it’s insights we find at the edges – where conflict happens. 😉
Reply addressees: @partymember55
Source date (UTC): 2025-04-23 01:24:19 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1914852803228602368
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1914851053821895161
I mean, by now we all know Hoe_Math is brilliant, and a great communicator, and a strong comedian. But you know, this one’s next level. lol https://twitter.com/ItIsHoeMath/status/1914802170320617942
Source date (UTC): 2025-04-23 01:20:37 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1914851874458755139
OK HM. That was next level. ;). -hugs
Source date (UTC): 2025-04-23 01:19:44 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1914851649149133258
Reply addressees: @ItIsHoeMath
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1914802170320617942
(NLI Humor)
Absolutely Agree.
I just have to be careful – they gang up on me. 😉
(Yeah Luke Weinhagen. I saw this…) https://twitter.com/The_DrivenMan/status/1914586910732984682
Source date (UTC): 2025-04-23 01:18:39 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1914851376909394258
https://twitter.com/The_DrivenMan/status/1914586910732984682
thinking…
Pressure(cause) > Spin(Quanta) > Charge(Physics) > Capacitance (life) > Cooperation(Multicellular Life) > Work(Morphology, Move) > Transmission(Current, Chem, Molecules, Nerves) > Adaptation(Memory) > Bias(hormones) > ( more of the same ).
Something of that nature.
Source date (UTC): 2025-04-23 01:06:49 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1914848401570898217
Reply addressees: @Claffertyshane
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1914775244121817515
OUR TOP SCHOOLS DO NOT TEACH LAW BUT SEDITION
When I was in college in Connecticut in the late 70s we could take certain courses across the network, and lectures at Yale were frequently worth the 45 minutes to an hour of travel time – especially if brick oven pizza was involved. We also used Trinity – mostly for movies. Wesleyan for art shows, but little else. And I won’t mention Connecticut College. 😉
My research on reform required I spend a little too much time with the curriculum of the top law schools in the USA, and I came away rather horrified – we don’t practice the intent of the University as the church intended, which was to produce people capable of sharing the aristocracy and nobility’s burden of public health (Physicians), morality (Theology), and behavior (Law).
We do not teach the natural law as a science of cooperation of large numbers of increasingly anonymous and varied people at scales that are individually incomprehensible.
We do not teach that that our institutions are empirical not political: that sovereignty and equality under the law are produced by our universal reciprocal insurance of individual one another’s sovereignty, and that we are the only people who are truly sovereign because of it;
And that the common law, the purely empirical, adversarially discovered within and across regions under the applied natural law of sovereignty; that the determination of collective action by concurrency we call democracy is empirical measurement of consensus prior to issuance of legislative contract between parties;
And that mankind will never end our innovation in cooperation – but likewise never end our innovation in free riding, rent seeking, parasitism, and predation.
And that all human organizations as they scale suppress local deceptions, rents, parasitisms and predations to pay for central suppressions of them; while gradually producing the same incentives among those whose job it is to suppress them.
And that the anonymity of those who, seeking exit from those market forces in the safety of bureaucracy, do deterministically by their power distance, serve their and their common interests first, and exhaust the surpluses of the vast edifice of civilizational cooperation through endless justification, differing only from murderers, rapists, thieves, conspirators, both private and public that they have so gently but systematically replaced.
Civilizations die for the same reason: the overproduction of rentiers whose soft and distant corruption in vast numbers by ways small and large destroy the trust that was necessary for the trust producing investment and risk by millions in thousands of subtleties every day until the calcification is sufficient that the polity cannot respond to gradual change of immanent shock.
Instead, under the marxist sequence’s imitation of the abrahamic sequence, itself an imitation of the feminine sequence of warfare by sedition, has created an industry that undermines the one thing that makes possible the greatness of the west in contrast to the rest – all of whom failed by 800ad despite their first mover advantage: individual responsibility for every other’s individual sovereignty in our demonstrated interests: to be free of parasitism leaving us only cooperation to survive, and the trust in one another that we will be so.
Our law schools do not teach moral law with which to produce a population of insurers of trust – they teach immoral activism just as certainly as the marxists and abrahamists did … and still do. Appealing to the vanity of self righteousness in advancing claims of oppression and conspiracy, where exists little other than the remains of meritocracy in a sea of rentiers.
If there is a devil. It’s name was abraham, and it came from UR – and when Hermes brought his cart of lies to the Levant, it is no wonder all in it was stolen. The most powerful lie being the false promise of freedom from evolutionary demand for cooperation at all costs in the defeat of the dark forces of time and ignorance: entropy.
Rebels seeking power are always evil – the only heroes are those seeking the power to deny power, such that only our individual insurance of one another – by pointy objects if necessary survives in markets for cooperation and markets for disputes we call courts.
Curt Doolittle
The Natural Law Institute
Reply addressees: @SRCHicks
Source date (UTC): 2025-04-23 00:59:20 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1914846518777163776
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1912691539127525488
–“What do you mean by universal ethno nationalism?”–
It means that given the distribution of differences between groups that we should maximize the capacity of ethnicities to self govern in those cases where the marginal difference in those ethnicities generates demand for different personal, social, economic, and political traditions, norms, and institutions – and in particular economic and legal institutions to the degree that the degree of autonomy and informality under natural law varies by the degree of agency in the population and the resulting demand for formality.
Given that people vary in ability and agency for production, cooperation, and trust, people need institutions both informal and formal sufficiently persistent in all contexts to provide external regulation for continuous preservation and improvement of individuals and the group such that it imposes no harms on other groups by its failure to do so.
This is about all there is to understand to ‘peace prosperity and evolutionary development’. The problem of course is that knowledge, methods, processes, technologies, and the surpluses that provide the capacity to disrupt networks of parasitism and predation remaining from the age of agrarianism and early industrialization are equally unevenly distributed and that we are going through the same category of transformation as we did from hunter gather to agrarian, and agrarian to industrial and now to technological.
in some ways, as others before have oft stated, the industrial revolution was either delayed by the fall of rome and the abrahamic cancers of judaism, christianity, and islam, (and now, again, by the marxist sequence), or early, if we account for their vicissitudes, and that the technological revolution we are now experiencing could equally have happened centuries earlier, and so when we were less entrenched in falsehoods and thus struggling due to the falsehoods (again abrahamisms) and recalcitrant corruptions (bureaucratic religion of the ccp, common corruption of the russian oligarchy, archaic corruption of iranic muslim demand for another caliphate of ignorance.)
Evolution isn’t merciful. We either create it by cooperation or we are destroyed by it for failing to cooperate. And to cooperate by the law of evolution: the natural law of evolutionary computation by the natural law of cooperation by the natural law of sovereignty by the duty of insurance of reciprocity in our demonstrated interests.
It’s just calculation. It’s physics. We don’t get a choice.
Reply addressees: @RichardArion1
Source date (UTC): 2025-04-23 00:22:08 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1914837156780232704
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1914831346264105279
If and only if the general strategy doesn’t work, and compared to what? Not acting now before the chinese act.
Source date (UTC): 2025-04-22 23:37:44 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1914825982181319007
Reply addressees: @Plinz
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1911495729186848980