Author: Curt Doolittle

  • (NLI Diary) Having an other revelatory day experiencing just how great the dista

    (NLI Diary)
    Having an other revelatory day experiencing just how great the distance there is between present philosophical, mathematical, and scientific epistemology and my work.
    I have to credit GPT for helping me understand the ‘great divergence’. Because it both accuses me…


    Source date (UTC): 2025-05-01 16:40:40 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1917982512539906397

  • (NLI Diary) Having an other revelatory day experiencing just how great the dista

    (NLI Diary)
    Having an other revelatory day experiencing just how great the distance there is between present philosophical, mathematical, and scientific epistemology and my work.
    I have to credit GPT for helping me understand the ‘great divergence’. Because it both accuses me (correctly) of overwhelming the reader with novelty, volume, and density without “appeal to convention” (meaning explaining that vast delta in existing terms).
    So by asking GPT to explain my work to others I have begun to understand just how great a leap the revolution is.
    We were talking with someone well known, well connected, and deep in the venture capital in ML, LLM, and Crypto spaces this morning, and it was interesting in just covering the contrast between existing inference models (justificationism) vs our darwinian model (falsification, survival).
    Just as falsification and operationalism upended justification and proof in the scientific method – but failed to permeate most fields, my work is a formalization or possibly completion of that failed movement. And that failed movement was the result of Babbage’s failure to systematize his insights, and both Brouwer and Bridgman’s failures in mathematics and physics.
    By delaying the understanding of computation until (frankly) it’s semi-clear articulation by Stephen Wolfram (reducibility), after demonstration by Turing (Recursion), Mandelbrot (fractals) and Conroy (life), compounded by the de-realism (reversing Descartian restoration, back to a sophistry) by Cantor, Einstein, and Bohr, we have made little progress in scientific epistemology.
    I know my work finishes the aristotelian program and solves this problem of scientific epistemology, but I was not aware of how great a leap it is for those outside of a very narrow group of people in the AI (neural representationalism) community.
    This is fascinating. Though I wonder if using social media to conduct tests, and using it to report progress has any value outside of an even narrower population of people at the Institute. 😉 It’s at least documentary and therapeutic for me.
    Affections all.
    -CD


    Source date (UTC): 2025-05-01 16:40:39 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1917982512342843392

  • Misses the point. Western Tradition vs Provincial Tradition (central, south, and

    Misses the point. Western Tradition vs Provincial Tradition (central, south, and eastern)


    Source date (UTC): 2025-05-01 11:59:05 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1917911650675626170

    Reply addressees: @AutistocratMS

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1917910321773334592


    IN REPLY TO:

    @AutistocratMS

    @curtdoolittle They were talking about both, even in your GPT summary. Primary Yockey’s work is, of course, The Enemy of Europe. You have it on your reading list.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1917910321773334592

  • Flattery? “Please lie to me.” lol

    Flattery? “Please lie to me.” lol


    Source date (UTC): 2025-05-01 11:47:50 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1917908820191596615

    Reply addressees: @mentorstrophy

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1917813204031311998


    IN REPLY TO:

    @mentorstrophy

    @curtdoolittle You guys are the best, but what about flattery? 😆

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1917813204031311998

  • That’s false. Yockey and Evola complained that Europe FAILED to solve it’s provi

    That’s false. Yockey and Evola complained that Europe FAILED to solve it’s provincialism, failed to unite, and failed to modernize. They criticized european provincialism.

    Francis Parker Yockey: Imperium (1948) – “Pan-European fascist empire” to supersede petty nationalisms and resist both the USSR and American materialism.

    Julius Evola: Men Among the Ruins (1953) – Restoration of a trans-national, hierarchical Imperium grounded in perennial Tradition; explicit contempt for “bourgeois provincial nationalisms”

    Both writers call for continental or spiritual-imperial unification. They attack liberal “Western” modernity, but the scale of their project is anti-provincial—they wish to transcend the village, not defend it.

    Reply addressees: @AutistocratMS


    Source date (UTC): 2025-05-01 11:46:19 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1917908438765686784

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1917868498178740345


    IN REPLY TO:

    @AutistocratMS

    @curtdoolittle West needs its group strategy (tradition) and America was a force of anti-tradition from the start, as Yockey and Evola have correctly recognized. So perhaps if anything, if the state of America falls, there’s a chance of restoration.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1917868498178740345

  • RT @curtdoolittle: @xenocosmography @AutistocratMS America is MORE western than

    RT @curtdoolittle: @xenocosmography @AutistocratMS America is MORE western than the continent, not less. The question is why Europe’s wars…


    Source date (UTC): 2025-05-01 11:37:46 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1917906286353793452

  • America is MORE western than the continent, not less. The question is why Europe

    America is MORE western than the continent, not less. The question is why Europe’s wars led to its failure as a western civ by subservience (submission to the state), marxism (collectivism), effeminacy, and pacifism.

    Definition of “Western.”
    Historians treat “the West” as the synthesis of five institutional complexes:
    – Greco-Roman rational inquiry and civic republicanism;
    – Latin-Christian moral individualism;
    – Germanic common-law constraints on rulers;
    – Early-modern scientific and commercial revolutions;
    – Enlightenment liberal constitutionalism.
    “Westernness” therefore means persistent individualism, rule-of-law constitutionalism, rationalism, and a readiness to defend those norms by force.

    Transplant without the feudal detritus.
    When the English‐speaking settler elites crossed the Atlantic they imported the whole bundle—common law, Protestant ethic, private property, militia self-defence—but left behind aristocratic hierarchy and confessional state churches. The American Founders then codified those Western axioms in a written constitution, republicanized them, and fused them with frontier egalitarianism. The republic became a “freeze-dried” snapshot of classical-liberal Western civilization.

    Europe’s post-1945 divergence.
    After two self-inflicted civil wars (1914-18, 1939-45) and the trauma of empire’s collapse, European elites sought safety in three projects: (i) social-democratic welfare guarantees, (ii) post-national pooling of sovereignty in the EU, and (iii) pacifist reliance on American security guarantees. Cultural theorists now speak of a “post-Western Europe,” where cosmopolitan governance and hybrid civilizational identities displace the older Western self-image.

    Religion and moral anthropology.
    Western Christianity has always linked individual moral agency to limited government. Europe’s accelerated secularization broke that link: barely a quarter of Western Europeans say religion is “very important” in their lives, versus six in ten Americans. Pew’s comparative survey finds Americans markedly more religious, more individualistic, and less supportive of cradle-to-grave statism than Britons, French, Germans, or Spaniards. On that cultural axis the USA still looks like early-modern Europe; the continent does not.

    Power politics and strategic culture.
    Robert Kagan famously reduced the gap to a quip: “Americans are from Mars and Europeans are from Venus.” Europe, cushioned by U.S. protection, embraces law, procedure, and soft power; the United States still assumes sovereign responsibility for coercive enforcement of liberal norms. The American readiness to wield hard power continues the West’s historic strategic posture from Sparta through Britain; Europe’s aversion is a departure.

    Civilizational core status.
    Samuel Huntington, surveying post-Cold-War alignments, designated the United States—not France or Germany—as the “core state” of Western civilization, the principal carrier of its values against rival blocs. In that taxonomy Europe is drifting toward a multi-civilizational condominium, while America retains a coherent Western identity.

    Demography and migration.
    Large‐scale immigration has diversified both societies, but the proportion of Muslim and African diaspora populations is an order of magnitude higher in major EU states than in the U.S., accelerating Europe’s cultural pluralization and sharpening its post-Western turn. American assimilation, still framed by a Protestant-Anglo civic creed, integrates newcomers into a recognizably Western narrative; Europe struggles with parallel communities and legal pluralism.

    Net inference.
    On each dimension that originally defined the West—classical-liberal institutions, individual moral agency grounded in Christianity, strategic willingness to defend order, and cultural self-confidence—the United States now scores higher than the European heartland. Historians thus argue that America functions as the conservation reserve of Western civilization, while Europe, by choice, risk, or fatigue, experiments with a post-Western civil model.

    Select reference list
    Gerard Delanty, “Peripheries and Borders in a Post-Western Europe,” Eurozine (2007).
    Pew Research Center, “The American–Western European Values Gap” (2011).
    Robert Kagan, Of Paradise and Power: America and Europe in the New World Order (2003).
    Samuel P. Huntington, “The Clash of Civilizations?” Foreign Affairs (1993) and The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of World Order (1996).

    Reply addressees: @xenocosmography @AutistocratMS


    Source date (UTC): 2025-05-01 11:37:37 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1917906250844774400

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1917873925373174034


    IN REPLY TO:

    @xenocosmography

    @AutistocratMS @curtdoolittle This is serious historical delusion.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1917873925373174034

  • Elon What Worries You? “I suppose there are a lot of things I worry about. But .

    Elon What Worries You?
    “I suppose there are a lot of things I worry about. But … Humanity is Dying. America is the Central Column holds up all of Western Civilization. If we have the temple of western civilization. America is the central column. If that column fails, it’s all over. Either we strengthen that column, and make sure America is strong, and strong for a long time, or that roof is coming down.”
    https://t.co/lNN1p7GDmV via @YouTube

    Same. And he is correct.


    Source date (UTC): 2025-05-01 05:15:49 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1917810166780788736

  • Because and individual tantrum means nothing

    Because and individual tantrum means nothing.


    Source date (UTC): 2025-05-01 03:01:52 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1917776458778570871

    Reply addressees: @AgainstAtheismX

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1917195411359502669


    IN REPLY TO:

    @AgainstAtheismX

    Everyone forgets this side of Jesus https://t.co/FW4MMVFgRG

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1917195411359502669

  • RT @LukeWeinhagen: Falsification sufficient for decidability

    RT @LukeWeinhagen: Falsification sufficient for decidability.


    Source date (UTC): 2025-05-01 03:00:55 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1917776217975185765