Author: Curt Doolittle

  • A difference in judgements. There are those of us who were not indoctrinated, sy

    A difference in judgements. There are those of us who were not indoctrinated, systematize more than empathize, and have agency more so than fear. THere are those who were indoctrinated, empathize more than systematize, and have more fear than agency.
    Additionally some of us are foolish and see the other end of the spectrum as wrong rather than different, and some of us that are foolish and cannot comprehend the other end of the spectrum. But there are some who can understand the opposite end of the spectrum and who also feel compassion for their need for security versus agency.
    Peterson is smart enough and moral enough, systematizing enough yet empathic enough, to recognize that people below a certain level of intelligence, a certain level of systematizing, and a certain level of agency, literally cannot function without faith.
    And some of us, who have studied world religions, easily recognize that the folks at the bottom who are christian live better lives than the folks at the bottom in every other religion or every other secular frame.
    We might also recognize that one can treat god as outside the universe, of the universe, a product of the universe, or a product of man within the universe – but as long as we identify the same moral laws, the manner of the existence of god is immaterial TO OTHERS.
    Likewise we can see Jesus as god, jesus as the product of god, jesus as the product of the laws of the universe which he perceives as god, or jesus as a teacher who understands the laws of the universe and teaches to the faithful and those who need faith in the name of god.
    We need not agree on the origin of god or the origin of the teachings of jesus to obey the. laws of jesus, god, and nature. If they are the same then they are true regardless of their origin.


    Source date (UTC): 2025-05-26 20:07:18 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1927094213667148066

  • FYI: Ordered 30 days ago. Received notice of delay today. Notice states order au

    FYI:
    Ordered 30 days ago. Received notice of delay today. Notice states order automatically cancelled if not filled in 30 days. No information on predicted ship date.


    Source date (UTC): 2025-05-26 19:49:11 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1927089653896618262

  • The correct answer is that Peterson does not want or need faith. However, he wou

    The correct answer is that Peterson does not want or need faith. However, he would not deny others faith or it’s benefits to the faithful. In his debates he is defending those who who want or need faith.


    Source date (UTC): 2025-05-26 19:29:12 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1927084623919530230

  • @dr_duchesne RD: Amazon can’t ship? Publisher problem? 🙁 Greatness and Ruin: Se

    @dr_duchesne

    RD: Amazon can’t ship? Publisher problem? 🙁

    Greatness and Ruin: Self-Reflection and Universalism within European Civilization Paperback – March 28, 2025 by Ricardo Duchesne


    Source date (UTC): 2025-05-26 19:15:10 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1927081092776910960

  • “Restoration does not mean asking nicely. It means rebuilding the ability to say

    –“Restoration does not mean asking nicely. It means rebuilding the ability to say no, and enforcing the conditions under which yes has meaning.”– The Crisis of the Age, Chapter 20, Introduction. (Via Insight from Luke Weinhagen)


    Source date (UTC): 2025-05-26 17:13:17 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1927050419064168953

  • Most philosophical questions are actually sophisms. The truth is that at this po

    Most philosophical questions are actually sophisms. The truth is that at this point we know the answer to almost every question other than those we cannot inspect such as the very large and very small.


    Source date (UTC): 2025-05-26 15:06:22 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1927018478298366262

  • Stupidity? 😉

    Stupidity? 😉


    Source date (UTC): 2025-05-26 04:25:16 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1926857140464947535

  • (Diary) My female friends are utterly amazing, and a positive influence on my li

    (Diary)
    My female friends are utterly amazing, and a positive influence on my life. And I disagree that men and women can’t be friends. There just can’t be any meaningful attraction (eros) there. If that’s both unwanted and off the table, and both of you get what you give, it’s wonderful. Especially when you’re on the extreme end of the male cognitive spectrum, such that female social insight appears like a superpower. 😉
    I loved women. I loved the playful dance between men and women. In my generation we liked each other. And I’m sad for the present and especially urban generations who have turned sex differences into interesexual warfare.
    It’s partly due to the marxist-to-feminist-to-woke cult’s evolution, and partly the male counter-revolution against it. But it’s also part of the disappearance of the possibility of the one income family, the cost of the educational diploma mill, the expansion of white color clerical work during the age of computers, and of course, the industrialization of relationships through social media treating it as shopping rather than seeking opportunity to adapt to one another, the end of liability for interference in or termination of a marriage, with it’s common property, child support, and alimony – all of which I expect to end by the beginning of the next decade.
    In fact, given that list its amazing we aren’t going extinct through lack of reproduction.
    Wait… we ARE.


    Source date (UTC): 2025-05-26 04:18:11 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1926855357084614893

  • (NLI, Choice Words) From Volume 1, The Crisis of the Age, Chapter 35. –“Democra

    (NLI, Choice Words)
    From Volume 1, The Crisis of the Age, Chapter 35.

    –“Democracy as Surrogate Religion for the Irresponsible
    The problem with universal democracy is not merely its structure—it is its substitution. Democracy today does not function as a system of self-governance by the responsible. It functions as a surrogate religion for the irresponsible.
    Religions evolved to provide epistemic and moral structure to those who could not produce it on their own. They reduce moral complexity to heuristics, encode constraint in taboo, and outsource judgment to myth. They were essential under conditions where few had the luxury—or capacity—for self-regulation.
    Modern mass democracy has replicated this structure. It promises salvation through voting, status through opinion, and moral vindication through policy identification. It replaces demonstrated agency with ideological sentiment, and substitutes belief in process for demonstrated consequence.
    When responsibility becomes unbearable, people seek relief in ritual. When agency becomes impossible, they seek dignity in myth.
    Democracy, in this form, is no longer a means of governance. It is a system of moral anesthesia—numbing the population to its lack of consequence-bearing by offering simulated participation. The ballot box becomes the altar. The party platform becomes the scripture. The voter becomes the believer.
    This is not accidental. It is a functional adaptation by the polity to include those who are otherwise disqualified from reciprocal cooperation: those without kin, cost, stake, or contribution. Rather than exclude them as dependents, the system integrates them as believers. But the price is decidability, constraint, and ultimately, governability.
    The problem is not that democracy permits the people to rule. The problem is that it mythologizes rule where there is no responsibility, and in doing so, it converts governance from a system of reciprocal enforcement into a theater of moral performance.
    Where law once governed behavior, belief now governs perception. And belief requires no evidence—only belonging.”–


    Source date (UTC): 2025-05-25 15:59:40 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1926669505482158450

  • (Diary) When your ex calls you up to berate you as a means of asking you to resc

    (Diary)
    When your ex calls you up to berate you as a means of asking you to rescue her from another set of iffy decisions.

    Men must choose between treating them as children or crazy. At least as children they’re forgivable. If crazy the only solution is walking away and no contact.


    Source date (UTC): 2025-05-25 02:42:07 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1926468793376657483