Author: Curt Doolittle

  • There are only so many ways to pay for the commons. 1. One is commissions from t

    There are only so many ways to pay for the commons.

    1. One is commissions from the activity created by the market created by the institutions including that of law. This can be either sales or income.
    Income causes the LEAST interference in the pricing system and human behavior.
    Sales too much influence on both.,

    2. The other is payment for services: We either pay for services directly allocated to us, in itemized fashion every year;
    Or
    We use direct economic democracy with the budgets for each thing we need to finance, and we individually allocate our funds to whatever we wish, until all funds are allocated.

    The problem with the second one is that people will try to game it and try to free ride on it.

    Progressive taxation means the wealthy pay for nearly all taxes, which is how america works despite the rancor of the left, and more than half of the people free ride on the taxes paid by the wealthy – given only half us contribute meaningfully to taxes, and of those who do almost all are white males over 35.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-10-06 21:56:21 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1710413711645507584

  • I only need 150 more followers to reach 10k. And it’s not going all that fast be

    I only need 150 more followers to reach 10k. And it’s not going all that fast because for some reason we are being censored a bit.

    Your help in this matter appreciated. πŸ˜‰


    Source date (UTC): 2023-10-06 21:21:01 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1710404820983480744

  • There are only so many ways to pay for the commons. One is commissions from the

    There are only so many ways to pay for the commons.
    One is commissions from the activity created by the market created by the institutions including that of law. This can be either sales or income. Income causes the LEAST interference in the pricing system and human behavior.…


    Source date (UTC): 2023-10-06 21:19:31 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1710404440337891545

    Reply addressees: @bryanbrey

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1710402427315278238

  • There are only so many ways to pay for the commons. One is commissions from the

    There are only so many ways to pay for the commons.
    One is commissions from the activity created by the market created by the institutions including that of law. This can be either sales or income. Income causes the LEAST interference in the pricing system and human behavior. Sales too much influence on both.,

    The other is payment for services: meaning we vote for public services (auction is perhaps better) and we pay for those services we consume – but this just causes massive free riding.
    Or
    We use direct economic democracy with the budgets for each thing we need to finance, and we individually allocate our funds to whatever we wish, until all funds are allocated. This means you can’t over-fund anything, and you can’t close until you’ve funded everything. πŸ˜‰


    Source date (UTC): 2023-10-06 21:19:30 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1710404440220422144

  • I assume you mean Georgism, not the economics of Georgia. I think it was an inte

    I assume you mean Georgism, not the economics of Georgia.

    I think it was an intelligent even if failed attempt to find a radically different yet simple solution to the post-agrarian age. However, it relies on arbitrary valuation, causes capital flight, is administratively challenging if not impossible, and while we have implemented it widely in the USA as property tax, and it produces insufficient revenue for almost any purpose at all, and is continously contentious.

    The problem is better understood as density aborbs all increases in value by transfers to owners of property and real estate. And that problem is better understood as a failure of the state to finance housing at no interest to families within the range of that density.

    The only ‘fair’ taxes are sales and income tax – and we hate them. We only hate income tax because it is too complicated instead of proportional and consistent without exceptions or deductions. And we hate sales tax because it isn’t included in the price, and too many things are taxed.

    The most unfair ‘tax’ is interest on consumer credit applied to durable goods, and semi-durable goods, when we are only borrowing against our future selves, and these goods then expire over the time we have borrowed the money from – it makes no sense and it’s predatory on our people. There is no reason for interest on homes, autos, boats, appliances, durable furniture, and really, even clothes.

    Likewise there is no reason for intergenerational transfer of income instead of the singapore model of individual savings with contributions by the state, which are invested by the state ( or some agents ) for retirement, medical care, and unemployment.

    Reply addressees: @MathPolice


    Source date (UTC): 2023-10-06 21:05:17 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1710400861782831104

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1710391092481581346

  • RT @curtdoolittle: @ThruTheHayes @Chargerfryar @randomal974199 @NatLawInstitute

    RT @curtdoolittle: @ThruTheHayes @Chargerfryar @randomal974199 @NatLawInstitute No one owes anything to anyone other than equal defense of…


    Source date (UTC): 2023-10-06 20:58:49 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1710399235047227830

  • No one owes anything to anyone other than equal defense of what they have earned

    No one owes anything to anyone other than equal defense of what they have earned by means of reciprocal cooperation. You nor anyone else has a claim on anyone else other than defense against those who would harm you and what you have demonstrated an interest in through reciprocal exchagne.

    I don’t owe you. “Society” is another word for “me and him and him”. And so we don’t owe you anything. Instead if you do not like the terms, you are, like any other, welcome to depart and find people you prefer to cooperate with on your terms.

    Your access to the polity is granted only by not imposing costs upon the demonstrated interests of others obtained by reciprocal exchange.

    In other words you have access to a polity in exchange for avoiding crimes.

    Those who contribute to a polity for the purpose of producing public capital of course, then logically, in defense of their i nterests, have say in how it is used for the benefit of all who have access to the commons.

    No on is responsible for you. Period.

    Reply addressees: @ThruTheHayes @Chargerfryar @randomal974199 @NatLawInstitute


    Source date (UTC): 2023-10-06 20:58:46 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1710399220790738945

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1710397806320431361

  • No argument, since you aren’t stating why they ‘should’ if they can’t demonstrat

    No argument, since you aren’t stating why they ‘should’ if they can’t demonstrate capacity to do so. You always have public speech. You always have defense in court. But if you are a dead weight on society and polity then you demonstrate you’re not competent for influencing the…


    Source date (UTC): 2023-10-06 20:54:05 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1710398041381834935

    Reply addressees: @Chargerfryar @ThruTheHayes @randomal974199 @NatLawInstitute

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1710397097860829286

  • I think I need to have a few glasses of scotch before I can keep up with you thi

    I think I need to have a few glasses of scotch before I can keep up with you this evening. πŸ˜‰


    Source date (UTC): 2023-10-06 20:53:50 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1710397979964723333

    Reply addressees: @Real_SF

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1710396462922862822

  • BASIC ECONOMICS: “TYPES OF GOODS” In economics and taxation, goods are categoriz

    BASIC ECONOMICS: “TYPES OF GOODS”
    In economics and taxation, goods are categorized in various ways to understand their characteristics, utility, and the implications for market behavior and policy. Here’s a comprehensive breakdown of the categories:

    Durable Good
    Definition: Durable goods are goods that do not quickly wear out or yield utility over time rather than being completely consumed in one use.
    Lifespan: Durable goods have a long useful life, typically over three years. Automobiles often have a useful life of several years, making them a prime example of a durable good.

    Capital Good:
    Capital goods are durable goods used in the production of goods or services.
    Taxation: Often exempt from sales tax when purchased for use in manufacturing.

    Intermediate Goods
    Definition: These are goods used in the production of other goods. They are not final products and are subject to further processing.
    Taxation: Often exempt from sales tax when purchased for use in manufacturing.

    Semi-Durable Goods
    Definition: These goods have a lifespan that is longer than non-durables but shorter than durables. Examples include clothing and shoes.
    Taxation: Generally subject to sales tax, with some exemptions depending on the jurisdiction.

    Non-Durable Goods
    Definition: These are goods that are consumed quickly or have a short lifespan, typically less than three years. Examples include food, fuel, and toiletries.
    Taxation: Often subject to sales tax, and sometimes additional excise taxes, depending on the jurisdiction and the type of good.

    Consumer Goods
    Definition: These are goods bought for consumption by the average consumer. They can be further classified into convenience, shopping, specialty, and unsought goods.
    Taxation: Subject to sales tax, with rates and exemptions varying by jurisdiction and type of good.

    Private Goods
    Definition: These are goods that are both excludable and rivalrous. Most consumer goods fall into this category.
    Taxation: Subject to various forms of taxation, including sales, excise, and import duties.

    Veblen Goods (Luxury)
    Definition: These are goods that are perceived as exclusive as their price increases, like luxury cars or designer handbags.
    Taxation: Often subject to luxury taxes in addition to sales taxes.

    Club Goods
    Definition: These are goods that are excludable but non-rivalrous. Examples include private parks or subscription services.
    Taxation: Sales tax applicable, and sometimes subscription fees are also taxed.

    Common-Pool Resources
    Definition: These are goods that are non-excludable but rivalrous, like a public fishing ground.
    Taxation: May be subject to licensing fees or other forms of indirect taxation.

    Public Goods
    Definition: These are goods that are non-excludable and non-rivalrous, meaning that individuals cannot be excluded from use, and use by one individual does not reduce availability to others. Examples include clean air and public parks.
    Taxation: Funded through general taxation but not directly taxed.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-10-06 20:46:57 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1710396245007552512