Do your reseach. The Maoists destroyed almost every remnant of classical civilization. Even then the narrative is false. China has been through more rolling wars, conquests, and revisions than the west, and is nearly as bad and fragile as each subsequent wave of conquerors both before and Islam. Always achieving the same end: parasitism, devolution, ignorance, and dysgenia. Instead Chinese civilization is ‘new’ in the sense that it began with Mao and is still trying to escape leninism-maoism so that the elites can continue to prey on the hard working people, just as the russian elites prey on their people. And just as over the past seventy years, the elites in the west have marched toward preying on the people as all elites eventually try to do – which is why the overproduction of pseudo-elites always ends in calcification and collapse.
If you do not know these things you are unfit to speak to me about anything with any assertion of opinion. Instead ask questions. I think the world would be a lot better off if it just watched @Whatifalthist’s and @Caspianreport’s videos two or three times through, and @PeterZeihan’s coverage of at least Russia and China.
For the jewish vs european conflict conundrum the publications are suppressed but while the medieval to early modern era cast the conflict as spiritual, we now undersetand it is genetic, cultural, strategic, and a method of parasitic colonialism using the female method of warfare. Historically we have post-spiricual authors: Joly(FR), Belloc(UK), Solzhenitsyn(RU), Ramsay(UK), Ginsberg(Jewish), MacDonald(US). My refinement over Macdonald is scientific and technical where his is historical – my advantage being the age of computation and my specialization in aritifical intelligence, cognitive science, behavioral economics and legal decidability is very different from his work in intellectual history and psychology. The fact that we independently came to the same conclusions using different methodologies is just further confirmation of the validity of our work.
You should take comfort in the fact that if you are jewish and you are hostile to western civilization, then it’s largely genetic and cultural. And that by reforming our laws to prohibit feminine means of antisocial, parasitic, seditious and treasonous behavior, we can force a long overdue reformation in Jewish culture – the result would be, as we saw pre-war, a marginal indifference between scottish presbyterians and reformed jews.
We can live together in peace. But peace without parasitism. And a demand for loyalty that the feminine appear not to be able to bear, and the jews have resisted for over two thousand years.
Reply addressees: @ratjadi
