Author: Curt Doolittle

  • RL, This is an interesting topic. I understand all behavior as rational and rati

    RL,
    This is an interesting topic. I understand all behavior as rational and rationally explicable, but that people are possessed of different abilities, different intuitionistic biases, different cognitive errors and biases, and different knowledge to work with. And that under various forms of stress or it’s opposite, we sometimes or often choose poorly. So I wonder if you percieve the world consisting of the narratievs or conscious beliefs, where I percieve the world consisting of very predictable bot-hood that only appears crazy but isn’t – it’s just ignorance, error, bias, wishful thinking, fraud, deceit and denial of one kind or another.
    So is that the same thing then? I think possibly. Its just which side of the cognitive coin are you looking at.
    Thanks for listening to me talk myself through that question. lol šŸ˜‰

    Reply addressees: @whatifalthist


    Source date (UTC): 2023-10-14 01:54:16 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1713010300708876288

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1712865802314023250

  • So (a) I dispute the point (b) I addressed the point correctly the first time, (

    So (a) I dispute the point (b) I addressed the point correctly the first time, (c) so now i’ve thorougly addressed the point inescapably, and (d) in doing so demonstrated that I do not hold amaturish beliefs based on limited knowledge as you do, but that I disagreed becasue you were simply absurdly wrong, because as I argued you have a comic book understanding of these matters.

    You could have answered this question by a set of google queries, rather than assuming your ‘impressions’ are true. Instead you wasted my time.

    When someone like me deigns to interact with you then at least have the good grace to ask questions and seek to understand rather than assume you have even the vaguest idea what you’re talking about.

    You’re welcome.

    Reply addressees: @TheBest0pinions @NatLawInstitute @vyomaga


    Source date (UTC): 2023-10-14 01:46:56 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1713008454594342912

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1712998930978586834

  • THE UNEDUCATED IN THE MIDDLE EAST AND AFRICA –“In sub-Saharan Africa, roughly t

    THE UNEDUCATED IN THE MIDDLE EAST AND AFRICA
    –“In sub-Saharan Africa, roughly two-thirds of Muslim adults (65%) have no formal schooling. The same is true for roughly four-in-ten Muslim adults in the Middle East-North Africa region (42%) and three-in-ten in Asia-Pacific region (32%).”–Pew Research

    –“65% of Muslims in sub-Saharan Africa had no formal education—the highest anywhere in the world. By contrast, only 30% of Christians in the region had not enrolled or completed any form or level of schooling”–

    Overall, about half of the middle eastern people are functionally uneducated. And you wonder why they’re poor. Without a reformation of islam and an education system built on that reformation it’s no wonder that there is a conflict between majority middle class jews, and majorty underclass (not even working class, not even lower class, but underclass) muslims.

    I’ve been watching this number for thirty years and it’s not impressive, even compared to india, and it’s insulting compred to china.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-10-14 01:42:04 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1713007230012850176

  • Q: WHAT WAS THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN ITALIAN FASCISM AND ROME? (TLDR: symbolism an

    Q: WHAT WAS THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN ITALIAN FASCISM AND ROME?
    (TLDR: symbolism and nothing else)

    Italian Fascism under Benito Mussolini did not explicitly aim to restore the Roman Empire, but it did draw heavily on Roman symbolism and history as a means of legitimizing the regime and inspiring a sense of nationalism. Here’s a detailed breakdown:

    Symbolism and Rhetoric
    Roman Salute: The Fascist regime adopted the Roman salute as a symbol of authority and unity.

    Latin Phrases: Latin phrases and Roman terminology were used in official discourse to evoke a sense of historical continuity.

    Architectural Revival: Mussolini commissioned buildings in the neoclassical style to evoke the grandeur of Rome.

    Ideological Underpinnings
    Nationalism: The Fascist ideology was deeply rooted in a form of extreme nationalism that sought to unify Italy under a single, authoritarian rule, much like the Roman Empire.

    Militarism: Just as Rome had expanded through military conquest, Mussolini sought to make Italy a dominant power in Europe, most notably through the invasion of Ethiopia.

    Political Strategy
    Legitimization: By drawing parallels between his regime and the Roman Empire, Mussolini aimed to legitimize his rule and inspire a sense of duty and sacrifice among Italians.

    Unity: The evocation of Rome served to unify a nation that was still grappling with regional differences following its relatively recent unification in the 19th century.

    Differences
    Scope and Scale: While the Roman Empire was a vast territory that lasted for centuries, Fascist Italy was relatively limited in both time and territorial reach.

    Ideological Foundations: The Roman Empire was not Fascist; it had its own set of social, political, and economic structures that differed significantly from those of Mussolini’s regime.

    While Italian Fascism drew heavily on the symbolism and grandeur of the Roman Empire, its primary aim was not the restoration of the empire but rather the creation of a strong, unified, and authoritarian Italian state.

    ECONOMICS
    Fascism as an economic system is often characterized by a hybrid of state interventionism, corporatism, and a focus on autarky (economic self-sufficiency). While it’s important to note that fascism is primarily a political ideology, its economic components serve to bolster the ideology’s broader goals of national unity, strength, and self-sufficiency. Here’s a detailed breakdown:

    Key Components
    State Control: The state plays a significant role in directing economic activity but usually does not abolish private property or enterprise. Instead, it seeks to guide the economy to serve national interests.

    Corporatism: Fascist economies often organize labor and industry into collective associations or “corporations.” These entities are meant to suppress class conflict and create a harmonious relationship between labor and capital under state supervision.

    Protectionism: Fascist regimes typically adopt protectionist policies to safeguard domestic industries. This includes tariffs, import quotas, and subsidies for local businesses.

    Autarky: The goal of economic self-sufficiency is often a key component. This is aimed at reducing dependency on foreign nations, both for raw materials and finished goods.

    Militarization: A significant portion of economic output is often directed towards the military. This serves dual purposes: it strengthens the state and also acts as a form of economic stimulus.

    Anti-Communism: Fascist economic systems are often positioned as a “third way” that opposes both liberal capitalism and Marxist socialism. However, they usually maintain capitalist structures.

    DIFFERENCES BETWEEN ROME AND FASCIST ITALY
    The Roman Republic/Empire and Fascist Italy were separated by nearly two millennia, and thus they operated within very different historical, cultural, and technological contexts. However, both have been influential models of governance and have had a lasting impact on Western political thought. Here’s a detailed comparison:

    Structure of Government
    Rome
    Republic to Empire: Rome transitioned from a Republic, governed by a Senate and two consuls, to an Empire under a single emperor.

    Checks and Balances: During the Republic, Rome had a complex system of checks and balances, including a Senate, popular assemblies, and magistrates.

    Provincial Rule: Rome governed a vast empire through a system of provinces, each overseen by a governor appointed by the central authority.

    Fascist Italy
    Totalitarian State: Italy under Mussolini aimed to establish a totalitarian state where all aspects of life were controlled by the government.

    One-Party Rule: The Fascist Party was the only legal party, and Mussolini ruled as Il Duce, the leader.

    Corporate State: Mussolini introduced the concept of the “Corporate State,” where various sectors of the economy were represented in a single body, aimed at harmonizing the interests of labor and capital under state supervision.

    Structure of the Economy
    Rome
    Slave Economy: Rome’s economy was heavily dependent on slave labor.

    Agricultural Base: Agriculture was the backbone of the Roman economy, although trade and craftsmanship were also important.

    Taxation: Rome had a complex system of taxation, especially in the provinces, to fund its military and public works.

    Fascist Italy
    State Intervention: The state played a significant role in directing economic activity but did not abolish private property or enterprise.

    Protectionism and Autarky: Fascist Italy aimed for economic self-sufficiency and protected domestic industries.

    Militarization: A significant portion of economic output was directed towards military endeavors.

    Relationship Between Government and People
    Rome
    Citizenship: Roman citizenship was a prized status that conferred numerous legal protections and was eventually extended to all free inhabitants of the empire.

    Legal System: Rome had an advanced legal system that has influenced Western law to this day.

    Public Works: The Roman government invested in extensive public works, including roads, aqueducts, and public buildings, for the benefit of its citizens.

    Fascist Italy
    Propaganda: The Fascist regime used extensive propaganda to cultivate loyalty and suppress dissent.

    Youth Organizations: Young people were indoctrinated through Fascist youth organizations.

    Suppression of Dissent: Political opposition was not tolerated, and dissenters were often imprisoned or executed.

    HISTORY
    The intellectual and ideological roots of fascism can be traced to a variety of nationalist movements and thinkers that predate the 20th century. While fascism as a formal doctrine was first articulated in the early 1900s, its antecedents can be found in earlier periods.

    Giovanni Gentile.
    Was an Italian philosopher and one of the key intellectual figures behind the development of Italian Fascism. Gentile was a collaborator of Benito Mussolini and co-authored “The Doctrine of Fascism” (1932) with him. His philosophy of “actual idealism” was a significant influence on fascist ideology, emphasizing the centrality of the state as an ethical entity that transcends individual will and consciousness.

    Gentile’s work provided the intellectual scaffolding for many of the key tenets of fascism, including authoritarianism, nationalism, and the primacy of the state over the individual. His ideas were instrumental in shaping the educational policies of Fascist Italy and were used to legitimize the authoritarian practices of the regime.

    Nationalist Movements Influencing Fascism
    German Romantic Nationalism: This movement emphasized the Volk (people) and their organic unity. It was a reaction against Enlightenment rationalism and Napoleonic rule.

    Italian Risorgimento: The 19th-century movement for Italian unification was a form of nationalism that sought to create a single, unified Italian state.

    Pan-Slavism: This Eastern European movement aimed to unite all Slavic peoples under one rule, often in opposition to Austro-Hungarian or Ottoman control.

    French Nationalism: The French Revolution and the Napoleonic era had a profound impact on the development of nationalist thought, emphasizing the power and sovereignty of the nation-state.

    Influential Authors and Thinkers
    Niccolò Machiavelli: His work, especially “The Prince,” influenced fascist ideas on statecraft and the use of power.

    Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel: Hegel’s philosophy, which emphasized the role of the state as the realization of the ethical ideal, had a significant impact on fascist ideology.

    Friedrich Nietzsche: His concept of the Übermensch and critique of traditional morality were appropriated by some fascist thinkers, although Nietzsche himself was not a fascist.

    Charles Maurras: A French nationalist and monarchist, Maurras influenced fascist thought with his emphasis on integral nationalism.

    Gabriele D’Annunzio: An Italian nationalist and proto-fascist, his actions during the “Fiume Endeavor” were admired by Mussolini.

    Oswald Spengler: His work “The Decline of the West” influenced fascist ideas about the cyclical rise and fall of civilizations.

    Carl Schmitt: A German jurist and political theorist, Schmitt’s ideas on political sovereignty and the “state of exception” were influential in fascist ideology.

    Gustave Le Bon: Known for his work on crowd psychology, Le Bon influenced fascist ideas on mass mobilization and propaganda.

    Vilfredo Pareto: His theories on social elites and the “circulation of elites” influenced fascist views on leadership and governance.

    Cheers
    Curt Doolittle

    Reply addressees: @TheBest0pinions @NatLawInstitute @vyomaga


    Source date (UTC): 2023-10-14 01:27:05 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1713003460184915968

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1712998930978586834

  • The age of religion is over. the need for mindfulness, standards of behavior, ex

    The age of religion is over. the need for mindfulness, standards of behavior, explanatory narratives, group strategy, will never end. I’m quite sure that we see the re-emergence of the ‘greek way’ with the odd difference that the feminine version of stoicism is some sort of self help nonsense. But we see it emerging of it’s own volition. How to convert it into something coherent and educable is going to take work.

    Reply addressees: @SwornInvictus


    Source date (UTC): 2023-10-14 01:09:24 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1712999011085320192

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1712997740542673363

  • “The defining terms of american democratic ideals are ‘life, liberty and pursuit

    –“The defining terms of american democratic ideals are ‘life, liberty and pursuit of happiness’. But from From the Middle Eastern perspective. the defining words governing their term of democracy would likely reflect ā€œfairness. justice, equality. unity and charity’– General…


    Source date (UTC): 2023-10-14 01:07:15 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1712998466337604069

  • “The defining terms of american democratic ideals are ‘life, liberty and pursuit

    –“The defining terms of american democratic ideals are ‘life, liberty and pursuit of happiness’. But from From the Middle Eastern perspective. the defining words governing their term of democracy would likely reflect ā€œfairness. justice, equality. unity and charity’– General Abdel Fattah el-Sisi, United States Army War College, 2005

    This is a difference between western homogeneous, high trust, masculine (paternal), heroic and aspirational civilzation, and middle eastern low trust feminine (maternal) cautionary and safety-seeking civilization.

    Like I keep saying. look at the religious civilization of the middle east as feminine in cognition, familial, tribal, low trust, emotional, and conducting warfare by undermining, consisting of overconfident arrogant factions, that cannot and will not trust one another, so while rule of law may be possible, it is not clear whatsoever that democracy is possible, and even encouraging it before the successful implementation of rule of law, and successful emergence of a middle class and scale organizations and networks of complex production, then democracy is a folly.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-10-14 01:07:14 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1712998466203385856

  • The Usual Excellence from Caspian Report

    The Usual Excellence from Caspian Report
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2xjmelFwJow


    Source date (UTC): 2023-10-14 00:55:14 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1712995442382852408

  • I suspect you think there is meaning in your response, but that is only because

    I suspect you think there is meaning in your response, but that is only because you only grasp your frame of reference and therefore are unaware of permutations on the same theme. There is no equivalent to fascism because there was no possibility of that level of control of the economy. I suspect what you are conflating is the dictatorial powers granted in time of war during the republic or some presumption that the imperial phase was somehow fascist. I dunno. Because you’re effeminate outbursts under pretense of argument aren’t clearn enough. I’ve tolerated a series of your amateurish bits for two days now. I can tolerate a bit more but otherwise you’re an adolescent waste of time.

    Reply addressees: @TheBest0pinions @NatLawInstitute @vyomaga


    Source date (UTC): 2023-10-14 00:29:19 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1712988921800294400

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1712986587687158064

  • Hmm.. not quite. They were still socialist systems. They weren’t monarchical, an

    Hmm.. not quite. They were still socialist systems. They weren’t monarchical, and they weren’t governed by rule of law.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-10-14 00:15:08 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1712985354490298388

    Reply addressees: @TheBest0pinions @NatLawInstitute @vyomaga

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1712984038028538013