Author: Curt Doolittle

For Those Who Are Less Forgiving, Here’s The Causality for The Prosecution of the Jews

Paul Johnson, from whom I took a great deal of early insight, does not go into the reasons the Jews were prosecuted, and it was always and everywhere with good reason.

They were the ‘undesirables’ when egypt conquered the region. Egypt acted as all empires do – either relocating peopl from different regions to help in administration, or by finding locals tribes who are outcast – neither of which is easily bribed by the locals. This is the origin of jewish accountancy and literacy.

While Jesus tried to illustrate the problem with his outrage, it requires an economist to explain why he was demanding an end to parasitism upon the people, baiting into hazard, at the top, and pettiness and selfishness from those. at the bottom.

The Romans allowed local law and custom as long as it did not contradict limited roman law – and a demonstration of loyalty by sacrifice (the ancient world’s form of symbolic taxation). The jews were a competent people by this time, and (rationally) resisted rome – but in the end, the countryside was depopulated, jews forbidden access to Jerusalem, and The Jewish sect we call Christian religion gained legitimacy.

Upon the diaspora jews used these same tools, and continued the same practice they’d learned from the Egyptians: (a) alliance with the state against the people paricularly in tax collection (b) usurious interst ‘bating into hazard” usually over 300%, (why they were prohibited property – so they couldn’t bait and seize it), (c) slaving (d) selling gambling, prositution, alcohol on credit (baiting into hazard) (e) using these gains to influence the state, or gain competitive advantage against the locals, (think how big box stores killed downtowns and local business), (f) always and everywhere undermining local morality by the above means, by profiting from baiting the locals (farmers) into hazards.

In other words they profited from immorality simply because ther was a shortage of hard currency. And while europe replaced them with the more moral version in the Templars, the french (always the enemy of europe) allied with the pope to kill off the templars (why we celebrate Friday the 13th – the killing of the templars), because the french king was so endebted to them, and the pope was a family member of the french king. Unfortunately, while the french king escaped paying his debt to the templars, and the Templars were replaced by the Jews again, the papacy and the monarchy both discovered that the money didn’ exist in a dragon’s horde, or great safe, because it was all lent out earning interset. Today Switzerland is what’s left of the Templars.

The solution to the behavior of the jews (contrary to the beliefs of libertarians and conservatives) was fiat money, and state banks, and state provision of consumer credit – and now requires only the extension of the criteria for fraud into baitings into hazard – which is (the consumers don’t understand) the reason for consumer dissatisfaction with business, industry, banking, credit, and advertising.

Can we also end Jewish supremacy, pseudoscience, an undermining by legal suppression of moral and monetary baiting into hazard, using ill gotten gains to scale it – into the prohibition on their invention of a series of new religions (the marxist sequence, libertarianism, leninism(hillary clinton) and neoconservatism) using the female method of seduction into the false promise of freedom from the laws of scarcity, human behavior, and natural selection? Of course we can. It’s just an extension of fraud in commerce to fraud in politics and religion.

So it’s rather easy to end the conflict with the jews by ending the viability of the jewish group strategy (which is just the female stratgy against males) that’s thousands of years old, and forcing them into legitimate businesses, where they must engag ein production rather than parasitism, undermining, and political and religious fraud.

Do people know they do evil? No. We all justify what works. That’s what civilizations do. We all do it. But we can also all stop it.

If we know how.
And we do.

Curt Doolittle,
The Natural Law Institute
The Science of Cooperation

RL: This is why I love you man. 😉 I love your soul.

For Those Who Are Less Forgiving, Here’s The Causality.

Paul Johnson, from whom I took a great deal of early insight, does not go into the reasons the Jews were prosecuted, and it was always and everywhere with good reason.

They were the ‘undesirables’ when egypt conquered the region. Egypt acted as all empires do – either relocating peopl from different regions to help in administration, or by finding locals tribes who are outcast – neither of which is easily bribed by the locals. This is the origin of jewish accountancy and literacy.

While Jesus tried to illustrate the problem with his outrage, it requires an economist to explain why he was demanding an end to parasitism upon the people, baiting into hazard, at the top, and pettiness and selfishness from those. at the bottom.

The Romans allowed local law and custom as long as it did not contradict limited roman law – and a demonstration of loyalty by sacrifice (the ancient world’s form of symbolic taxation). The jews were a competent people by this time, and (rationally) resisted rome – but in the end, the countryside was depopulated, jews forbidden access to Jerusalem, and The Jewish sect we call Christian religion gained legitimacy.

Upon the diaspora jews used these same tools, and continued the same practice they’d learned from the Egyptians: (a) alliance with the state against the people paricularly in tax collection (b) usurious interst ‘bating into hazard” usually over 300%, (why they were prohibited property – so they couldn’t bait and seize it), (c) slaving (d) selling gambling, prositution, alcohol on credit (baiting into hazard) (e) using these gains to influence the state, or gain competitive advantage against the locals, (think how big box stores killed downtowns and local business), (f) always and everywhere undermining local morality by the above means, by profiting from baiting the locals (farmers) into hazards.

In other words they profited from immorality simply because ther was a shortage of hard currency. And while europe replaced them with the more moral version in the Templars, the french (always the enemy of europe) allied with the pope to kill off the templars (why we celebrate Friday the 13th – the killing of the templars), because the french king was so endebted to them, and the pope was a family member of the french king. Unfortunately, while the french king escaped paying his debt to the templars, and the Templars were replaced by the Jews again, the papacy and the monarchy both discovered that the money didn’ exist in a dragon’s horde, or great safe, because it was all lent out earning interset. Today Switzerland is what’s left of the Templars.

The solution to the behavior of the jews (contrary to the beliefs of libertarians and conservatives) was fiat money, and state banks, and state provision of consumer credit – and now requires only the extension of the criteria for fraud into baitings into hazard – which is (the consumers don’t understand) the reason for consumer dissatisfaction with business, industry, banking, credit, and advertising.

Can we also end Jewish supremacy, pseudoscience, an undermining by legal suppression of moral and monetary baiting into hazard, using ill gotten gains to scale it – into the prohibition on their invention of a series of new religions (the marxist sequence, libertarianism, leninism(hillary clinton) and neoconservatism) using the female method of seduction into the false promise of freedom from the laws of scarcity, human behavior, and natural selection? Of course we can. It’s just an extension of fraud in commerce to fraud in politics and religion.

So it’s rather easy to end the conflict with the jews by ending the viability of the jewish group strategy (which is just the female stratgy against males) that’s thousands of years old, and forcing them into legitimate businesses, where they must engag ein production rather than parasitism, undermining, and political and religious fraud.

Do people know they do evil? No. We all justify what works. That’s what civilizations do. We all do it. But we can also all stop it.

If we know how.
And we do.

Curt Doolittle,
The Natural Law Institute
The Science of Cooperation

Reply addressees: @whatifalthist