Author: Curt Doolittle

  • WHY DO SO MANY ASHKENAZIM HAVE RED HAIR? (not complicated – sorta….) 1) Back h

    WHY DO SO MANY ASHKENAZIM HAVE RED HAIR?
    (not complicated – sorta….)

    1) Back haired south eurasian semititic male jews from the levant.
    2) Brown, Blonde, Red, haired European Women from the Roman Region
    3) Immediate inbreeding.
    4) Jewish population bottlnecks
    5) Continued…


    Source date (UTC): 2023-10-18 16:18:02 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1714677224266256424

    Reply addressees: @Jawgenius

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1714669671658475604

  • WHY DO SO MANY ASHKENAZIM HAVE RED HAIR? (not complicated – sorta….) 1) Back h

    WHY DO SO MANY ASHKENAZIM HAVE RED HAIR?
    (not complicated – sorta….)

    1) Back haired south eurasian semititic male jews from the levant.
    2) Brown, Blonde, Red, haired European Women from the Roman Region
    3) Immediate inbreeding.
    4) Jewish population bottlnecks
    5) Continued Extraordinary inbreeding creating extraordinary mutations – ie: why jews are more vunlerable to genetic defects and diseases.
    6) Coloring, especially hair, is polygenic. Though one gene in particular carries heavy influence.
    7) Small groups with similar complex mutational load combined with polygenic expression, selected for memory, verbal and calculation skills, selects for female traits, yielding european coloring bias. (Yes, turns out that historical observation as well as present suspicions are true. 😉 )

    Summary,
    European female introgression, european female bias in recursive trait selection, inbreeding, mutation, bottlenecking. (Kinda neat really.)

    Sidebar:
    (One of my best friends is a prototypical tall, large round- headed, blue eyed, red haired half jewish male working in the upper reaches of the financial sector. My wife had long red hair. So did my best friend when I was younger. So did my first girlfriend. While my hair was originally blond and matured into taupe (mouse brown), and now as I’m older it’s darker brown, I had quite abit of red and blonde in my beard before it went grey. So I’m kind of partial to red hair. (Very))

    GENETICS OF THE COLOR OF HAIR
    The coloration of hair is primarily determined by the type, amount, and distribution of pigments called eumelanin and pheomelanin, produced by cells known as melanocytes. These pigments are influenced by a variety of genes and single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs). Here are some primary genetic distinctions:

    Note: (a) primary influence is expression of, resistance of antagonism of the MC1R gene. (b) we don’t know how many copies of these genes exist (that I know of) or how many variable expressions are regulated, but it’s dominant. (c) there are really two regions that determine coloration. It’s the Black/Brown and the Blonde. The blond is from the Ancestral North Eurasians where we have genetics from around Lake Bikal I believe. (They’re gone, just integrated into us).

    Black Hair:
    MC1R Gene: In people with black hair, the MC1R gene typically functions efficiently, facilitating a high production of eumelanin. This creates the darkest hair shades.

    ASIP Gene: The Agouti Signaling Protein (ASIP) gene can inhibit the MC1R function to some extent but usually doesn’t in the case of black hair. Efficient MC1R function ensures eumelanin dominates.

    TYR, TYRP1, and DCT Genes: These genes are also crucial for the enzymatic pathway that leads to eumelanin production. Mutations or polymorphisms in these genes usually result in less effective eumelanin production and thus lighter hair.

    HERC2/OCA2 Complex: The intronic SNP rs12913832 in HERC2 influences OCA2 expression, and a specific combination of alleles at this SNP is generally associated with darker hair colors including black.

    Brown Hair:
    MC1R Gene: In brown-haired individuals, the Melanocortin 1 Receptor (MC1R) gene usually functions normally, promoting the production of eumelanin over pheomelanin.

    TYR, TYRP1, and DCT Genes: These genes are also responsible for the production and function of enzymes involved in eumelanin production.

    SNPs: Various SNPs like rs12821256 have been associated with brown hair, usually increasing eumelanin synthesis or affecting its distribution.

    Red Hair:
    MC1R Variants: Variants of the MC1R gene are the most significant factor for red hair. These variants reduce the MC1R protein’s activity, leading to higher levels of pheomelanin.

    RHC or Red Hair Color Alleles: Specific mutations like V60L, D84E, R151C, R160W, and D294H on the MC1R gene are known as RHC alleles and are commonly found in red-haired individuals.

    Other Contributing Genes: Although MC1R is the primary determinant, other genes may also contribute to red hair color when mutated, though these are less well-understood.

    Blond Hair:
    KITLG and SLC24A4 Genes: These genes have been found to influence lighter hair shades, including blond.

    MC1R: A normally functioning MC1R gene can also result in blond hair if other genes that contribute to lighter pigmentation are present.

    SNPs: Various SNPs like rs1667394 in the OCA2 gene have been associated with blond hair.

    Interactions and Modifiers:
    Polygenic Traits: Hair color is polygenic, meaning it’s influenced by multiple genes interacting with each other.

    Environmental Factors: Sun exposure and other environmental factors can also modify hair color over time, although these changes aren’t genetically mediated.

    Sources:

    “Genome-wide association studies identify several new loci associated with pigmentation traits and skin cancer risk in European Americans” by D. Liu et al., Human Molecular Genetics, 2015.
    “Genetics of Skin Color Variation in Europeans: Genome-wide Association Studies with Functional Follow-up” by M.A. Visser et al., Human Genetics, 2014.
    “Variants of the melanocortin 1 receptor gene (MC1R) and freckling among Hispanics” by E.J. Herraiz et al., Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology, 2016.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-10-18 16:18:01 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1714677223876153344

  • THE GOODS AND BADS OF JEWISH CONTRIBUTIONS TO THE SCIENCES AND PSEUDOSCIENCES Wh

    THE GOODS AND BADS OF JEWISH CONTRIBUTIONS TO THE SCIENCES AND PSEUDOSCIENCES
    While Pinker was instrumental it’s not true that Jews were in particular. The Jews also put forward blank slate-ism though indirectly. It’s central to the marxist sequence as it was to the abrahamic sequence before. Worse, because of it, Jews dominate the pseudosciences including boaz in anthropology, freud in psychology, marx in everything including econ, gould in evolutionary biology, lewontin in genetics, cantor, bohr, (even some of einstein) in math, the entire postmodern and frankfurt movements, libertarianism, anti-male feminism, zinn and harari, in history, rez, kelsen, dworkin, hart are especially frustrating in destroying western legal traditions. And today, we’re stuck with the NYT giving moutpieces to DeLong, Stigler, and Krugman (who is the most anti-white person in academia).

    So Jewish contribution to ‘science’ has been ok in physics and chemistry and medicine, but jewish intellectuals have done extraordinary damage to the behavioral, sociological, political, economic, and evolutionary sciences.

    This is a habit by the way. Jews act like tehir history didn’t exist from 100AD thu 1500AD. And a cursory analysis of why they ‘forget it’ is because their persecutions were earned every single time.

    I’ve had to work on the feminine > semitic > jewish > abrahamic > marxist sequence of expressions of feminine antisocial and parasitic behavior, and I don’t really like what I”ve found. But there is plenty of blame on the feminine side just as on the masculine of violence and war.

    And it’s time to update our law, as we did with our commonlaw, to equally suppress the feminine means of antisocial, anti-economic, anti-political behavior as thorougly as we have the male. The difference is that the feminine mind is less self regulatory and consious and far more implusive in these matters, so it’s going to be harder than outlawing the incremental discovery of male means of irreciprocity (crime).

    HISTORY
    The Blank Slate theory, also known as “tabula rasa,” has a rich history rooted in philosophy, psychology, and more recently, neuroscience and genetics.

    Ancient and Classical Periods:
    Aristotle: While not fully endorsing a blank slate theory, Aristotle’s work laid some early groundwork by suggesting that the mind is unscribed at birth.
    (CD this is not the same as tabula rasa, he was saying only that we learned, not that we were equal. If you read his writings he was anything but an equalitarian.)

    It’s an Abrahamic Mythos

    Medieval and Renaissance:
    Avicenna (Ibn Sina): An Islamic philosopher who maintained that the human intellect at birth is a tabula rasa, allowing humans to obtain knowledge through empirical means.

    Thomas Aquinas: Merged Aristotle’s ideas with Christian doctrine but still maintained aspects that alluded to a blank slate.

    Enlightenment:
    John Locke: Widely considered the key figure who popularized the term “tabula rasa.” Argued that humans are born without innate ideas and that knowledge comes solely from experience and perception.

    19th Century:
    John Stuart Mill: Extended Locke’s ideas and strongly advocated for empiricism, stating that human character is entirely a product of upbringing.

    Early 20th Century:
    Behaviorists (John B. Watson, B.F. Skinner): In psychology, behaviorists argued that all behavior is a result of conditioning and that the human mind starts as a blank slate.

    Mid to Late 20th Century:
    Noam Chomsky: Criticized behaviorism, suggesting that the capacity for language is innate, a direct challenge to the blank slate theory.

    Sociobiology (E.O. Wilson): Introduced ideas that both genetic and environmental factors play a role in human behavior, challenging the idea of a blank slate.

    Human Genome Project: The mapping of the human genome raised questions about the role of genetics in human behavior, intelligence, and disposition.

    21st Century:
    Steven Pinker: Published “The Blank Slate,” arguing strongly against the concept and suggesting that it is contrary to findings in genetics and neuroscience.

    Evolving Neuroscience: Continued research into the brain and genetics adds complexity to the idea, suggesting an interaction between innate traits and environmental conditions.

    Sources:

    “The Blank Slate: The Modern Denial of Human Nature” by Steven Pinker
    “Tabula Rasa and Human Nature” by Robert Hanna
    “Behaviorism” by John B. Watson
    “Syntactic Structures” by Noam Chomsky
    “Sociobiology: The New Synthesis” by E.O. Wilson

    Reply addressees: @cerflerg @NWEurasian @therminium @Steve_Sailer @RichardHanania


    Source date (UTC): 2023-10-18 15:49:23 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1714670016354820096

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1714649994135998973

  • RE-CONFIMATION OF ASHKENAZI ADMIXTURE, AND SUBSEQUENT INBREEDING. Nothing new he

    RE-CONFIMATION OF ASHKENAZI ADMIXTURE, AND SUBSEQUENT INBREEDING.

    Nothing new here. Another study confirming what’s already been done. Initial migration was from Israel to Rome by males who married local european women then began inbreeding again immediately. That’s a small pool. Then the bottleneck certainly occured when cast out of spain, the thing is there are a lot of bottlenecks over time.

    –“A new study concludes that all Ashkenazi Jews can trace their ancestry to a “bottleneck” of just 350 individuals, dating back to between 600 and 800 years ago.

    Our analysis shows that Ashkenazi Jewish medieval founders were ethnically admixed, with origins in Europe and in the Middle East, roughly in equal parts”

    They found that the Ashkenazi Jews’ genetic similarities were so acute that “everyone is a 30th cousin.”

    Because the Ashkenazi community started out so small, and remained genetically isolated, it developed a higher load of disease-causing mutations.

    Even today, Ashkenazi Jews are known to be at higher risk for many diseases, including breast and ovarian cancer and Tay-Sach’s disease. But many potentially disease-causing Ashkenazi mutations remain unknown.

    The study was published in the Nature Communications journal Tuesday.”–

    (Ed: HUMOR: I guess the Ashkenazim can’t pick on our southern hillbillies for inbreeding any longer. 😉 Pot calling the kettle kind of thing… OMG… )


    Source date (UTC): 2023-10-18 15:29:20 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1714664968237285376

  • Correct

    Correct.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-10-18 15:17:04 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1714661883796410443

    Reply addressees: @cerflerg @NWEurasian @therminium @Steve_Sailer @RichardHanania

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1714652993210008056

  • We are not equals in the least. Others have alread answered in the thread. That

    We are not equals in the least.
    Others have alread answered in the thread.

    That said:
    We are food, energy, and resource independent.
    We are currently repatriating industry and re-industrializing faster than we industrialized in the second world war. (See steel, electronics especially).
    We have an underutilized labor force at home for demanding work, and a less skilled labor force to the south for less demanding work.
    We have additional resources to the north.
    Even better, if we repatriate the ‘overhead’ (we have almost 100M unnecessary people for the coming economy, almost all in immigrant cities.)
    The more the world descends into chaos and war the more our stability and security are an advantage, particularly in capital flight.
    Our only problems are underclass immigration and ending the leftist-woke movement which has some signs of burning itself out. The rest of the economy will eventually recover by repatriation of industry, and repatriation of immigrants.

    Reply addressees: @foundation_west @RashidaTlaib @POTUS


    Source date (UTC): 2023-10-18 15:16:39 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1714661779811213312

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1714654657946210375

  • He was not wrong. He was speaking in terms of authority over one another – parti

    He was not wrong. He was speaking in terms of authority over one another – particularly against (a) the monarchy and nobility and church, and (b) before the common law. In other words, we have no right to coerce one another.

    The perception he meant something else is a contrivance produced by first the french and tehir nonsense, but later institutionalized by the marxists and their postwar assault on darwin, malthus, and spencer.

    Reply addressees: @NWEurasian @cerflerg @therminium @Steve_Sailer @RichardHanania


    Source date (UTC): 2023-10-18 14:38:51 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1714652265015898112

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1714643685701206284

  • I’m just stating it very densely and parsimoniously. If I have time I”l explain

    I’m just stating it very densely and parsimoniously. If I have time I”l explain it in one of our videos for you. It’s not that complicated.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-10-18 13:33:34 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1714635835067265292

    Reply addressees: @TweetAxxount1 @EricMorganCoach @Viorp2 @AntonyArakkal1 @Sargon_of_Akkad

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1714634912920113248

  • I dunno. Humans follow incentives. The incentives today for men are roughly the

    I dunno. Humans follow incentives. The incentives today for men are roughly the same, but for women they are not. As such we are seeing a natural return to matrilnealism even if we are preserving some patriarchy.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-10-18 13:32:29 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1714635565499293898

    Reply addressees: @boxkicker2191

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1714634962236850359

  • No, because (a) semitic cognition is more feminine (b) ashkenazi advantage is th

    No, because (a) semitic cognition is more feminine (b) ashkenazi advantage is through the male jewish intermarriage with the european female line, and continued selection upon it, within a cognitively feminine subculture.

    WOmen are actually more aggressive than men, and this…


    Source date (UTC): 2023-10-18 13:30:59 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1714635184526541063

    Reply addressees: @cerflerg @Steve_Sailer @RichardHanania

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1714624392750137626