Curt Doolittle

Author: Curt Doolittle

  • ^This is nonsense. The flynn effect resulted from minor changes at the bottom of

    ^This is nonsense. The flynn effect resulted from minor changes at the bottom of the curve, and from the gradual adoption of scientific thought (synthetic, general rules), replacing pre-scientific thought (discreet, specific rules).

    There was no iq deficit in nordic populations. Just the opposite. The only change we know of in nordic populations from antiquity is increase in neoteny because women had a more masculine face and it’s been gradually europeanizing over time to a more feminine (gracile) face.

    The way we judge the intelligence of a population is through their arts and crafts. In the case of the nordic shipwork and their arts, esp the anglo saxons for that matter, compared to say, the Scythians who paid the greeks to do their arts for them. Compared to the non-representationals. Compared to the primitivists. Hard to judge egypt for example because of the distribution of work. That said, there had to be some very smart people in ancient egypt *(they had a lot of time, and food, which allowed a division of ablor and production of artistic elites).

    Ovrer 98% of invention is european. And european IQ at present is lower than it was pre-industrial revolution due to reversal of manorialism’s impact on asymmetric reproduction. We’ve lost something like 14/15 points already. This is getting worse through immigration that is forcing us into a second world economy, as the lower IQ population replaces the higher IQ european population.

    Interesting is the absolute dearth of ashkenazi contribution until integrating into western civ, and even then they continued their tradition of mythicism (historical fabrication) in their massive and still harmful production of the pseudosicences. The “Einstein Industry” is an attempt by social construction to suggest the opposite, but it’s simple fact that the Jews contributed nothing to civilization despite being the most literate group of people in europe until they were allowed to integrate.

    Reply addressees: @cerflerg @alba_superbus_ @NWEurasian @NatLawInstitute @Steve_Sailer @RichardHanania

    Source date (UTC): 2023-10-21 17:15:26 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1715778834815983616

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1715776489189208467

  • all that changed was giving the ‘little people’ a means of achieving virtue by d

    all that changed was giving the ‘little people’ a means of achieving virtue by doing no wrong and caring for one another, despite having no ability, skill, land, wealth, military prowess, or political power – as a ‘slave revolt’ against the manipulative, the wealthy, and the aristocracy. In other words, Jesus taught them to rebel against the powerful by effectiely behaving in away that the wealthy wanted, and not allowing the wealthy and powerful to divide them.

    Reply addressees: @taiwtaiwb8 @VinnytheCrow

    Source date (UTC): 2023-10-21 17:03:39 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1715775870214832129

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1715764394640941403

  • (Fake News) –“Supreme Court blocks restrictions on Biden administration efforts

    (Fake News)
    –“Supreme Court blocks restrictions on Biden administration efforts to remove contentious social media posts”–

    Instead, the supreme court wants (a) to handle this matter itself and urgently, (b) because the lower court ruling is ‘overbroad’ (c) and because it has extraordinary impact (d) and because if it is of present import to the people.

    Alito was interesting in that he dissented, and wanted the ruling to stand. He gets it right once in a while. 😉

    The conservative block didn’t for one reason, which is the reason they always fall back on: they are trying to end legislation from the bench, bypassing the people and the legislature, thereby depriving the people of sovereignty:

    “This is a matter for the the people, via the legislature, and only after the legislature the court.”

    The court’s job is to clarify law, produce settled law, not make law, and the public perception that the court is making law is only due to the court prohibiting laws that interfere with the bill of rights (natural rights albeit poorly stated and incomplete).

    #SupremeCourt

    Cheers

    Source date (UTC): 2023-10-21 14:45:43 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1715741157236285440

  • “a camel would sooner fit through the eye of a needle than a rich man make it to

    —“a camel would sooner fit through the eye of a needle than a rich man make it to heaven/kingdom of god.”–

    (a) moneychangers
    (b) wealthy merchants
    (c) nobility

    Why? they (really) believed the common people were just another form of domesticated animal. And if you knew much about their behavior, you’d understand their position.

    Jesus was trying to change the behavior of the common people so that it was compatible with european aristocratic civilization and the wealth that civilization brought with it through peace, order, and law.

    Jesus’ teachings are as good as those of buddha or socrates. Churchianity is every bit as ridicuoous as the other abrahamic religions. But if that’s what it takes to get the message across to the peasants women and slaves, (and children) then that’s what it takes.

    Reply addressees: @taiwtaiwb8 @VinnytheCrow

    Source date (UTC): 2023-10-21 14:45:02 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1715740986809159680

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1715518817399402524

  • (Fake News) –“Supreme Court blocks restrictions on Biden administration efforts

    (Fake News)
    –“Supreme Court blocks restrictions on Biden administration efforts to remove contentious social media posts”–

    Instead, the supreme court wants (a) to handle this matter itself and urgently, (b) because the lower court ruling is ‘overbroad’ (c) and because it has extraordinary impact (d) and because if it is of present import to the people.

    Alito was interesting in that he dissented, and wanted the ruling to stand. He gets it right once in a while. 😉

    The conservative block didn’t for one reason, which is the reason they always fall back on: they are trying to end legislation from the bench, bypassing the people and the legislature, thereby depriving the people of sovereignty:

    “This is a matter for the the people, via the legislature, and only after the legislature the court.”

    The court’s job is to clarify law, produce settled law, not make law, and the public perception that the court is making law is only due to the court prohibiting laws that interfere with the bill of rights (natural rights albeit poorly stated and incomplete).

    Cheers

    Source date (UTC): 2023-10-21 14:45:43 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1715740040288956416

  • beat me to it

    beat me to it:
    https://twitter.com/VeritateIn/status/1715686003665694760

    Source date (UTC): 2023-10-21 13:18:20 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1715719165489659915

    Reply addressees: @bierlingm @DylanGTech @whatifalthist

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1715653957387686006

  • explain??

    explain??

    Source date (UTC): 2023-10-21 08:19:12 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1715643886125588875

    Reply addressees: @OtonielFilho5

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1715464052405641710

  • This conversation is above you – which appears to be a trend. Get some crayons a

    This conversation is above you – which appears to be a trend. Get some crayons and go play.

    Source date (UTC): 2023-10-21 03:28:17 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1715570674985562499

    Reply addressees: @TheBest0pinions

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1715547850808107315

  • “The g Factor: The Science of Mental Ability,” (1998) by psychologist Arthur R.

    “The g Factor: The Science of Mental Ability,” (1998) by psychologist Arthur R. Jensen. This work is a comprehensive examination of the “g factor,” which is a construct used in psychology to quantify what is common among various cognitive tasks.

    (It’s available on libgen)

    Source date (UTC): 2023-10-20 22:05:59 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1715489565878665635

    Reply addressees: @Real_SF

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1715481248553157021

  • Multicultural just means tribal. Westserners succeeded in overcoming tribalism b

    Multicultural just means tribal. Westserners succeeded in overcoming tribalism because it’s a liability that impedes trust and institutional formation enabling the benefits of cooperation at scale. Westerners overcame familism before tribalism. Becaues again, it’s a liability that prevents production of high trust commons. That’s why every tribal society is primitive. Multiculutralism is a bad thing. There is no extant evidence to the contrary – other than it’s enjoyable to have ‘quarters’ in international-trade cities so there is some transfer of ideas but not a transfer of culture or people.

    Source date (UTC): 2023-10-20 22:01:11 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1715488356472119296