Jan 01, 1997Place: Bellevue, Washington (47.6172, -122.199)Address: Bellevue, Washington 98004
Source date (UTC): 2012-01-23 14:04:00 UTC
Jan 01, 1997Place: Bellevue, Washington (47.6172, -122.199)Address: Bellevue, Washington 98004
Source date (UTC): 2012-01-23 14:04:00 UTC
DO YOU TALK TO YOURSELF?
Why do people talk to themselves? The humorous response is “So that I have someone intelligent to talk to.” But humor aside, the traditional psychologist’s argument has been that by involving more senses, verbalization helps to block out distractions, and to focus our thinking – especially when alone, and when under stress or when we want to plan.
But in Daniel Kahneman’s language, it means “System 2’s intentional system can more easily take control of System 1’s automatic system”. I tend to think of it as intentionally inserting stimulation into system 1.
System 1 is very, very loud in my head. That’s why I like to be around people. They keep me linked to the real world despite the bright and intense mental reality that emerges from System 1, in someone who has such exceptional memory. I think all mild “Aspies” have this problem, and all Autistic people are complete victims of it.
Does this sound like I’m happy to intellectualize talking to myself? It does. It also explains why I’m more likely to do it when I’m tired and surrounded by a lot of stimulation: the need to crowd out the sensory data so that I can focus on whatever it is I’m trying to concentrate upon. Most Aspies and all Autistics cannot as easily filter stimuli as well as normal people.
Perhaps I’ll feel a smidgen less guilty about talking to myself when I’m trying to plan the rest of my day from now on – but I doubt it.
=====
PLEASE READ
Please read “Thinking Fast And Slow”. For those people who haven’t kept up with research in psychology, he’s condensed the past half century into a few narratives which will help you understand our world better. And most importantly for conservatives and libertarians, he’s helped explain why conservatives are right in their concern about human hubris in everything – because we are intuitive more than rational and our intuition is terrible at statistics. In fact, the fact that we need the field of statistics is an attempt to overcome our incompetence in judgements about complex relations.
Source date (UTC): 2012-01-23 11:01:00 UTC
FUTURE NOIR
The world is a beautiful place. The essence of Conservatism is joy at present happiness over future utopian perfection. The minute and subtle improvement of the existing art and artifice over the crass flatulence of dramatic public assaults on our senses. The self knowledge of contribution, over the attention seeking of public recognition. It is the politics of the private. The harmony of uncoordinated achievement, made possible by uncoordinated plans.
NYC is a declining, decaying memory of it’s Anglo Dutch past. It has become the mirror of the extended slum of Los Angeles, separated only by the architecture and order of it’s anglo heritage, and the interdependence between it’s financial sector and the war machine that is washington DC. The city’s gothic legacy is obscured by the implicit praise of temporal consumption and the consequential irrelevance of a mandate for production. It is a society only in that it is so perversely anti-social.
There is nothing beautiful about it. Nothing to be learned from it. It is the expression of consumer sedition. The brightly burning flurry of consumption by locusts. It’s a dead carcass being feasted upon by every passing scavenger, and attracting vermin by the scent of its decay.
The world has moved on. No civilization in history has survived urbanization.
Although we did not know why until recently. The formal institutions of economic calculation we call ‘property’ which require that we act, and the informal institutions of manners, ethics, morals which constrain us from acting, can no longer operate in concert. We have made significant progress in the development of our formal institutions, by implementing credit ratings – the equivalent of ‘reputation’. Credit is an institutional memory of our formal and informal adherence to the social contract.
But it is not enough. When combined with easy credit, consumption increases without corresponding increases in productivity. And from that one act, men become locusts, and the fecundity of the upper classes is consumed by the malthusian fertility of the lower classes.
And over time, only the most durable monuments of stone leave a record of our having existed at all.
Source date (UTC): 2012-01-23 10:24:00 UTC
HAPPINESS
Having seen a couple of plays, walked the entire theater and shopping district, and cohabited with my felling north easterners for a few days, I’m decidedly relaxed and happy. And that in itself is remarkable.
Despite having an inner clock that’s naturally happy I haven’t felt so in a very long time – due to illness, undiagnosed allergies, extraordinary responsibilities, divorce, and the resulting stresses from each – any one of which is enough to shorten one’s life.
Unfortunately, the puritan ethic in both my genes, memory, class and culture, forbids me from even acknowledging happiness, and the iconically robed ascetic angel of consience on my shoulder warns me to ignore it and soldier onward.
So I hope I don’t tempt the vengeance of puritan christian fate, or the humor of the pagan gods of my ancestors by being thankful for a bit of happiness.
Perhaps I’ll leave a votive offering in the park so that they forgive my indulgence. 🙂
Source date (UTC): 2012-01-23 10:08:00 UTC
Linguini with porcini mushrooms in a buttery truffle cream sauce, bordering but not crossing into too salty. Flawless. Inspiring.
An accidental and surprising excellence in a random restaurant.
Source date (UTC): 2012-01-22 19:27:00 UTC
SEMINAR (A Play)
Staring Alan Rickman
Caught the play this afternoon despite the mixed reviews. Rickman is worth seeing no matter what he’s in, so I went on that alone. It’s certainly not Chekov, but it’s very well acted, enjoyable, and honest. And for those of us who aren’t amused by musicals, we’re a little desperate for off broadway content these days. I’ll agree that it seems as though it’s on the verge of being something very special but doesn’t quite make it there. But that said, for anyone who is haunted by artistic pressures, it’s certainly worth seeing, and a good use of time and money.
I don’t feel like I’m writing a ringing endorsement, but I mean to be. And personally I found it timely.
Source date (UTC): 2012-01-22 18:34:00 UTC
NYC COFFEE SHOPS – Think Coffee
Hit two of the top ten shops so far. Currently at Think Coffee near NYU. The shops so far don’t compare to Seattle or Moscow, although the ceremony here at Think Coffee is appropriate and the coffee tastes perfect – roasted dark but short of the burned flavor preferred by Pete’s and Starbucks fans. And it’s brewed carefully – one cup at a time in some cases. The baked goods are authentic and fresh. The help is the usually anti-conformist middle proletarian, but it suits the environment. Wireless, and lots of plugs for laptops.
Source date (UTC): 2012-01-22 11:07:00 UTC
http://marginalrevolution.com/marginalrevolution/2012/01/how-well-can-you-communicate-over-email-or-blog-posts-how-about-in-person.htmlONLINE WRITING SKILLS
Online writing has improved significantly since that paper was written. We err. We fail. We get slapped around. And we learn.
Or at least, most people do.
The three biggest problems with online discourse are: a) that it’s very difficult to negotiate a contract on the meaning of terms, and as such, most debates are eristic or autistic. b) that the medium does not tolerate the level of exposition needed to convey vast differences in the categories and judgements that are under discussion. c) almost no one, even the very best people, are able to articulate their positions by other than allegorical means, or without relying on the assumption that the methodology underlying their reasoning, is merely a convenience, not a representation or means of identifying true statements. (My glossary is fifty pages long. and it’s not anywhere near complete.)
Conservatives are the worst offenders because they rely on sentimental, historical and allegorical concepts, which if fully articulated as human actions, are demonstrably true. But since they’re so poorly expressed, usually as post-religous moral statements, they are all but useless in debate.
FWIW: I am absolutely nothing like my online persona, and everyone who meets me in person comments on it. Interpersonal relations are, well, personal. Debate online is political – purposeful. If I learned anything from the 20th century its that Friedman’s and Rothbard’s antagonistic relentlessness was more successful than Hayek’s modest civility.
Source date (UTC): 2012-01-20 17:20:00 UTC
http://www.multiplier-effect.org/?p=3351Yes, but we all KNOW that healthcare costs are the long term problem with the US budget.
We also know WHY healthcare costs are the problem:
1) extending the last year of life.
2) experimental procedures.
We also know why it’s a difficult problem to fix healthcare costs:
3) Because there is no market system by which doctors can choose to deny coverage for experimental procedures and extending the last year of life. Because it is expressly against medical ethics. Because it is profitable for businesses to deliver services. Because it is bad for business to reject a customer, who will just go elsewhere for the service.
4) Because there is no market system for controlling extension of the last year of life and experimental procedures, we must create a non-market system (a bureaucratic system) or “DEATH PANELS” to deny coverage for experimental procedures and extending the last year of life, in order to contain costs.
We also know why bureaucratization of experimental procedures is dangerous:
5) Because experimental work is expensive, research and development conducted by trial and error – most of which fails to produce beneficial results.
We also know why conservatives (republicans) dislike the bureaucratic method:
6) Because it is impossible to work harder, apply more discipline, and use one’s own initiative and resources, in order to secure access to the best doctors, facilities, and experimental treatments.
And it’s disingenuous to argue that this is a financial problem. It is in fact, a series of moral hazards – in the broadest sense of the term.
(The technical, mixed-economy solution, would be to transfer the costs that were rejected by the Death Panels for experimental procedures and extension of life to those poor people in need of health care. I’m not advocating that. I’m just suggesting that it’s the only known solution that avoids perverse incentives for all parties, while maintaining a closed healthcare ecosystem.)
We already solve the problem of transfers by subsidizing insurance companies for automobile drivers. There is no reason that we cannot sponsor (insure) non-profit, insurance companies that specialize in coverage for the underclasses, and make use of the visa/mc network to manage payments for services. We insure banks. Why can’t we insure insurance companies as a proxy for serving the disadvantaged?
Source date (UTC): 2012-01-20 14:35:00 UTC
GOSSIP
Back in Seattle for a few days. Hearing the usual industry gossip. (This is still such a small town.) And, I suppose nothing should surprise me. But the daftness of human beings, and their ability to envision drama where none exists, never ceases to amaze me. How on earth do people come up with this stuff?
Nothing ever happens to or with money without a lot of bankers and investors agreeing to it. The world is a mundane, bureaucratic, procedural place administrated by lawyers who are incentivized to over analyze everything.
Each of us has a narrow view of the world, and an exaggerated concept of our place in it.
This region is extremely simple. We had one company that created a lot of manufacturing and engineering jobs, that was overtaxed, over-regulated, and finally fled the state. We then won the lottery and got a second company that concentrated an unheard of amount of money in what was a previously semi-rural population. That company had an atypical organizational structure that asked purchasing decisions to me made by very junior people. That purchasing strategy was important when technology was new – since the older generation would not have been as aggressive or experimental – or cheap to hire.
But times change. People learn. Competitors emerge. And the Innovator’s Dilemma (curse) and the rent-seeking and laziness, politicization and disutility of bureaucracy take their normal course. That company no longer spends money in the same manner. It’s stock no longer appreciates in value as it did. And it’s employees no longer posses the relative wealth that they did. And so the entire region is affected by those changes.
And many people, who previously sold their skills and labor to that company, and because of it, who had an impression of themselves and their skills as special, scarce or unique, are now stunned and despondent over the change in their fortunes. They lived in homes, worked at companies, and built organizations, during a period, where the entire American economy was booming with debt, booming with cheap overseas products, and while at the same time, that regional company was exporting cash into a town with scarce resources, and a small population. Those frustrated people are competing the broader economy, not the unique and temporary economy that they were living in during the past. Like American laborers, who must now compete in the global economy against people who will work 14 hours a day doing the same work, people in this area must compete globally.
Revel in our time. In what we had. But don’t expect that it is repeatable. Or that there is anything you, or the people you work for, or the politicians that supposedly administer our governments, could have done anything about. If you had the opportunity to live during the period from 1988 – 2008 in this area, then appreciate having had the joy of participating in one of the greatest times and places to live in human history. (Remember the fun of Entros? The art galleries prior to 2001? The multiple playhouses? The increase in great restaurants? The feeling that it would never end? Daily life when Neo came upon our movie screens? Remember when Redmond was the ‘sticks’, and when Bellevue didn’t have a skyscraper?)
The American dream was first built on cheap land. Second on jobs that were possible because of cheap land. Third because the world went into a debilitating war. Fourth because of cheap credit made possible by the petrodollar and our postwar anti-communist military capability.
But the world caught up. There was no malfeasance – on anyone’s part. It’s just the slow five hundred year grid, as industrial capitalism moved from the heartland of England to every nation in the world. People in Beijing and countless other cities are living the seattle experience today. We can envy them, or celebrate them.
It’s a choice.
Source date (UTC): 2012-01-17 17:22:00 UTC