Author: Curt Doolittle

  • All Selection is Individual – But individuals do demonstrate selection as groups

    All Selection is Individual – But individuals do demonstrate selection as groups. A word game.
    I have this argument with Jayman (@JayMan471) because the ambiguity is causing unnecessary nonsense.
    It’s the only thing I’ve ever disagreed with him on. And that’s because (a) by the terms used in the field all selection is individual – no other selection exists: ie there is no group selection.
    However (b) this is a word game. All selection happens at
    the individual but humans are both extremely sexually adaptive (sheep, goats, horses, holes in things, anything), status seeking and predictive based on all sorts of criteria. Meaning that groups DO select by criteria even if within the group all individuals are selecting by that criteria.
    Neoteny is the most pervasive critiera, is highly selected for in women, and eventually spreads to men.
    Small isolated groups tend to demontrate more selection and variation. Groups with lots of neighbors have a harder time. Why? Because while you need about 1500 for healthy falsification of bad mutations, you also neeed to keep that number small enough to allow the spread of positive selection.,

    Reply addressees: @f_quiver


    Source date (UTC): 2023-10-22 21:39:44 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1716207736273125376

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1716200409105350960

  • RT @ThruTheHayes: THEY AREN’T WARRING SLOWLY ANYMORE The largest wealth transfer

    RT @ThruTheHayes: THEY AREN’T WARRING SLOWLY ANYMORE

    The largest wealth transfer in history happened during the pandemic; under your dures…


    Source date (UTC): 2023-10-22 21:07:13 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1716199554461102343

  • RT @WerrellBradley: Capital requires social organization and defense, which make

    RT @WerrellBradley: Capital requires social organization and defense, which makes it a demanding social function.

    Societies organize viole…


    Source date (UTC): 2023-10-22 21:06:24 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1716199346729800150

  • Books. Home page > Learn > All Documentation eight volumes. you can’t make use o

    Books. Home page > Learn > All Documentation
    eight volumes. you can’t make use of what’s up there really, but you can at least see what we’re working on.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-10-22 20:23:38 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1716188586280702166

    Reply addressees: @Agkistrodon14

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1716187178567442844

  • Antonio Gramsci is Buried at Protestant Cemetery, Rome. Something about tearing

    Antonio Gramsci is Buried at Protestant Cemetery, Rome.
    Something about tearing down monuments comes to mind…. 😉
    (sarcasm, but why can the left say it?)


    Source date (UTC): 2023-10-22 19:43:23 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1716178454385717341

    Reply addressees: @JackOfAwlTrades

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1716176219589529821

  • FUTURE: TURKEY, IRAN, AND EGYPT VS THE ARABS I Don’t disagree on potential of th

    FUTURE: TURKEY, IRAN, AND EGYPT VS THE ARABS
    I Don’t disagree on potential of these countries.
    I. Turkey is ethnically greek (indo european), despite the Kurds who dominate half of the country are Iranic.
    II. Iran is a mess but it’s still got enough ethnically persian (indo european).
    And III. Egypt isn’t all that arabized and are at least half ancient egyptian (south eurasian)
    All three of these countries suffer from (a) arabization and (b) islamization. (c) diversity. It’s tragic. And look what happend just to Lebanon recently. A catholic wealthy successful country turned into a disaster by muslim immigration.

    I. TURKEY
    Turkey is more than half Indo European, with little Arab genetic contribution.

    Indigenous Anatolian Component:
    a) Anatolian Influence: Before the Turkic migrations, the Anatolian peninsula was home to various indigenous groups, such as Hittites, Urartians, and others. Estimates suggest that this component could make up around 20-30% of the genetic landscape.

    b) Greek, Bulgarian, and Other Balkan Influence: Due to the Ottoman Empire’s rule over the Balkans and subsequent population exchanges, there is a notable Balkan genetic component, possibly around 10-20%.

    c) Caucasian Component:
    Armenian, Georgian, and Circassian Influence: Particularly in Eastern and Northeastern Turkey, the Caucasian influence is notable. This could be estimated around 5-15%.
    (In other words, Turkey is 50-65% Indo European – which they really, really, don’t like by the way.;) )

    Turkic Component:
    Oghuz Turks and Central Asian Influence: This is the most significant component due to the Turkic migrations and the establishment of the Ottoman Empire. This could range from 30-40%.

    Kurdish Component:
    Southern and Southeastern Regions: In regions bordering Syria and Iraq, there is some Arab and Kurdish influence, possibly making up around 10-20%.
    (Unfortunately I don’t see good numbers, but my estimation based on more recent data is that the Kurdish percentage is around 20%, the Arab is quite small. And the Turkic component is heavily overstated.

    Other Minorities:
    Jewish, Laz, and Others: These smaller groups contribute to the remaining genetic composition and are hard to quantify but might range around 1-5%.

    II. IRAN
    Iran is still 50-60% iranic.

    Indigenous Component:
    a) Persian Influence: The majority ethnic group in Iran is Persian, and they are estimated to make up around 50-60% of the population. Genetically, they are a mix of ancient Iranian peoples and subsequent migrations.
    b) Aryan Migration: The initial Aryan migration into the Iranian plateau has left a significant genetic component. While it’s challenging to quantify precisely, it could be considered as part of the “Indigenous Component.”

    Arab Component:
    Islamic Conquests and Later Migrations: The Arab component is less pronounced in Iran compared to some other countries in the region, estimated to be around 10-15%.

    Turkic Component:
    Turkmen, Azeris, and other Turkic groups: Turkic peoples, particularly Azeris, are a significant minority in Iran, and their genetic influence might range from 15-25%.

    Other Minorities:
    Kurds, Baloch, and Others: These groups contribute to the remaining genetic composition, which could range around 10-20%.

    Caucasian and Russian Influence:
    Northern Regions: In the northern regions adjacent to the Caucasus and Central Asia, there’s some genetic influence from these areas, estimated to be less than 5%.

    South Asian Influence:
    Eastern Regions: In regions bordering Pakistan and Afghanistan, there is some South Asian genetic influence, also estimated to be less than 5%.

    III. EGYPT
    Egyptian Genetics: not very arabized.
    (note that I included the south eurasian component to avoid conflation)

    South Eurasian Component:
    Ancient Egyptian Influence: This could be estimated to comprise around 40-50% of the genetic makeup, being a significant portion that represents continuity from ancient populations.

    North African Component:
    Berber and Indigenous Influence: Estimates vary, but this could be around 10-20% of the genetic makeup, particularly in Western Egypt.

    Nubian or Sub-Saharan African Influence:
    In Upper Egypt, this component may be more prevalent, potentially around 15-25%.

    European Component:
    Greek and Roman Influence: Given the historical periods of Greek and Roman rule, this component could be around 5-10%.

    Arab Component:
    Islamic Conquests, Trade and Later Migrations: Depending on the region, the Arab component could vary significantly but generally might make up around 15-25% of the genetic makeup.

    Reply addressees: @FernandoGLV1212


    Source date (UTC): 2023-10-22 19:42:02 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1716178117201473536

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1716167218470281726

  • (love the autistic Dennis Miller hyperdensity of cultural references – man after

    (love the autistic Dennis Miller hyperdensity of cultural references – man after my own heart. 😉 )


    Source date (UTC): 2023-10-22 19:22:20 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1716173159458631708

    Reply addressees: @EgregoresGalore

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1716170157385793980

  • Let me restate that in simple terms: –“The more stuff you have, the more stuff

    Let me restate that in simple terms:

    –“The more stuff you have, the more stuff you have to fight for, against more people who want your stuff, but won’t pay the material, behavioral, or knowledge costs of it.”– Paraphrase of Dr Brad.

    Who has the most physical, behavioral, and knowledge stuff?
    Well? Who wants a ‘piece of it’ without paying the cost of integrating into the physical behavioral and knowledge costs of it?
    And even among those within it – who seeks to evade the physical, behavioral, and knowledge costs of paying for it?

    You know the answer.
    It’s not multiculturalism you see.
    It’s just looting and pillaging really.
    And its starting to look a lot more like r**ping, looting, pillaging of biological, physical, behavioral, and informational capital.

    How do we know? We can measure it. We have:
    We’re being raided by enemies conducting r**ping, looting, pillaging, and otherwise destroying our milennia of accumulated physcal, behavioral, and ifnormational capital.

    Just because someone wars against you slowly doesn’t mean they aren’t waring against you completely.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-10-22 19:21:23 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1716172919561224192

  • Middle eastern history is quite simple. It’s a mall that intersects the “four co

    Middle eastern history is quite simple.
    It’s a mall that intersects the “four contients” (europe,asia, india, and africa) and four races, and it has the fertile crescent for africa and the middle east, and india has her major rivers and china has hers. SO there was the possibility of food sufficient for producing specialists. And specialized producing goods and services for trade.

    But middle eastern history conists of one tribe conquering a region, then building an economy, the anothe tribe conquering them and this process repeated throughout all of history until the Europeans, the Indians and the Chinese basically cut them off with the age of sail,ending the utility of the silk road, as well as the geography of the ‘mall’, and then walled them in with the agrairan-to-industrial revolutions.

    So MENA never developed nationalism, the nation state, high trust peoples, rule of law and trade. Becaue they cannot cooperate at scale, because theiving cheating corruption and ‘getting it first before someone else does’ is their ethical foundation. So they developed the opposite – the only strategy possible – the stragey of women: undermining.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-10-22 18:34:53 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1716161214928105472

  • That said, it’s all live online. It’s a bit hard to find by design. Because we w

    That said, it’s all live online. It’s a bit hard to find by design. Because we work on it live – meaning it’s always visible for those who are willing to pursue it. But as usual most people get lost very easily. It’s really too much for anyone without guided instruction. And we need the pamphlet (outline or summary) the science and the law to do that. The other books just make it easier to understand. and the Prosecution volume is a rather harsh suit against the enemeis for their war against our people.

    Reply addressees: @__Maneuver


    Source date (UTC): 2023-10-22 18:29:00 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1716159736482017280

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1716158160728150517