Author: Curt Doolittle

  • As someone who built a sizeable company specifically with the intent of experime

    As someone who built a sizeable company specifically with the intent of experimenting with libertarian management principles, I can argue that not only does it lead to a high growth company because of transparency and meritocracy, but it’s also a more pleasant place to work because people are empowered – they feel sovereign.

    HOWEVER HERE ARE SOME OBSERVATIONS

    1) CLASS

    libertarianism is a meritocratic, and therefore middle and upper middle class philosophy. If you want to have day laborers, it’s going to be less successful than if you have engineers because the former are less comfortable problem solving than the latter because the former are more open to cheating then the latter (this isn’t necessary that’s just how it works out due to class sorting and peer association).

    While we libertarians feel that liberty is the desire of all, it is not. It is the desire of those of us who have an intellectual advantage. The vast majority of people want only enough liberty to choose who directs them. They do not want to master the information necessary to be fully directed.

    In that sense, liberty is classically defined as consisting of multiple levels:

    1) Freedom of life, property and relationships (liberty)

    2) Freedom to form organizations (association)

    3) Freedom to choose leadership (corporation)

    4) Freedom to ostracize (nationalism)

    5) Freedom to convert or expand (imperialism)

    We libertarians agree with the first three, conservatives and some conservative libertarians with the first four, and neo-conservatives with all five.

    So one cannot easily create a libertarian organization across class lines, unless the majority of control is in the hands of those who wish to preserve that libertarian ordere, and its constant state of variation, meritocracy and competition.

    2) EXPOSE EVERYONE TO PRICES AND PROFIT

    Libertarianism and meritocracy require all people are exposed to the pricing system and its affects. Prices and profit are truths. Opinions are not. Bureaucracy is a synonym for insulation from the pricing system. Engineering this into many companies is extremely difficult. This is because many administrative disciplines are security rather than merit oriented (accounting for example).

    3) ELIMINATE ALL DEDICATED MANAGEMENT

    Middle management provides little if any value in almost all organizations. Knowledge exists at the bottom, and the knowledge to concentrate scarce capital at the top. Design your company to have no pure management. Everyone is responsible for profit. If they are not then you do not need them, and should organize your people differently. Usually it is better to compensate someone very dedicated to produce less profit and split time between leadership/mentoring and productivity/profitability. But if they are not themselves materially productive it is just a countdown before they become valueless. This is counter to human behavior because we all seek to avoid work and subsist upon rents. Management that does not either sell something or produce something is rent seeking.

    4) REORGANIZE YOUR COMPANY FREQUENTLY – EVERY SIX MONTHS

    Try to get your top talent to know more of the business by rotating them through different positions in the company. This will prevent your organization from calcifying in an attempt to be ‘efficient’ at delivering a fixed business model rather than ‘responsive’ and therefore efficient at delivering whatever business model is necessary to satisfy the needs of the market. (Note that it is possible to be a market follower and emphasize efficiency, but libertarianism is an effort to spur innovation. Leave it to liberals to live under the illusion that any commercial model represents a steady state.) Liberty is the source of innovation through competition. But competition creates multiple opportunity for loss.

    5) TALENT

    Marginally competitive companies possess superior talent in key roles. I devote at least a third of my time to recruiting talent.

    7) PROCESSES

    Processes calcify and compensate for stupidity and ignorance. Processes attempt to be efficient in order to minimize the need for interpersonal problem solving. However, this also means that processes are inhibitors to innovation and collaboration. Therefore all processes in your organization may be overridden if a) increase profitability without negative externalities. b) increase customer customer loyalty. (loyalty is meaningful. satisfaction is not. know the difference. satisfaction is only expressed meaningfully as loyalty.) c) increase the chance of opportunity generation without increasing the cost of opportunity generation. You must instill this culture in people so that the understand. Economics is the study, largely, of externalities, since internal exchanges are trivial, and externalities are complicated.

    8) SALES

    My experience is that companies under-invest in sales, and over-invest in fear. The people who generate sales are the most valuable people in your company. There are no exceptions. However, people who can generate sales are contextually dependent. Second, the good ones will only come to places where they are adequately rewarded. So when you are small you cannot generally hire talent that is worth what you pay them. Expect a 60-60% failure rate.

    9) EVERYONE IS A POTENTIAL CUSTOMER

    Every single person you meed is a potential customer. Just like actors and politicians lose their freedom because some paparazzi might catch them at an inopportune moment, an entrepreneur loses the freedom of self expression. (I chose expressly to break this rule because of my intellectual interests, but largely this worked to my advantage as self brand promotion. It turns out that if you will say really controversial things in public and try to defend them, then customers will assume you will give them the same unfiltered advice. It worked for me. In general though, I do not recommend it.)

    10) MANAGEMENT STRATEGY

    As a CEO, you can act as an investor, accountant, operator, salesman or craftsman. Or some combination. Because of personality differences it is unlikely that you will be even moderately successful at more than two. Know your strengths and hire the people who compensate for your weaknesses, but possess your strengths in some minor capacity. (I am a salesman, investor, and craftsman. I hire people who are operators and accountants to actually run the details of the business. Jack Welsh is different, Steve Jobs was different, Bill Gates is different, and Warren Buffett is different. And the guys who turnaround companies that are in trouble are different still. If you are entrepreneurial you are best off being sales and craftsman, because this means you master your industry and its customers. if you are a talented executive in a larger bureaucracy it is better to be operational and financial.

    11) PEER REVIEWS

    Conduct stack ranking peer reviews, with written comments at least once per year and exit the bottom ten percent of the company. (I usually was only able to exit the bottom 4% because the community building within the company was so strong that people would fight hard for underperformers if they thought that they could help them improve. This then creates passionate employees out of both the mentors and those people who were given help in succeeding.

    12) PITCHING AND DESIGNING

    Create some venue where employees suggest new uses for products, or new products, or new services, or pitches for customers. WE were always suprised at how many quiet people from the bottom of the company turned out to be our best idea poeople. It also makes it impossible for others to take credit for someone’s idea.

    13) CREATE PARTIES AND AFTER-PARTIES

    If you can find an excuse to spend a few hundred dollars taking people to a club, restaurant or entertainment venue where they can play, then do it. Every possible time. Have a big event at least once a year that requires formal dress, and is not in competition with some other holiday, just to celebrate each other. Terminate people who do not participate in social events.

    14) HIRE FAMILY AND FRIENDS IF THEY HAVE THE TALENT – NEPOTISM IS THE BEST LOYALTY YOU CAN BUY

    Loyalty is the willingness to absorb losses of opportunity for one’s self in order to create opportunity for the group to whom you are a member. Families do this by nature. Never hire ANY family member who cannot perform, or any friend, and never sacrifice your hiring process. But never discount a friend or family. They will work much harder at group cohesion than outsiders.

    EXPENSIVE?

    If any of this sounds either inefficient or expensive then you should do something other than go into business. People are tribal animals. they calculate all sorts of things with and against one another every day, every hour, every second.

    Make sure that they are calculating something that binds them together to create products and services for your company, in the service of customers, that can be delivered to them at a profit. Because profit is our only way of knowing that we have made use of the world’s resources to serve others, in a manner that they demonstrate by their dear actions rather than their cheap words.

    CLOSING

    I have spent too much time on this post already, but perhaps it will do one person some good. And if so, then I’ve passed it on, and done the moral thing. 🙂

    Cheers


    Source date (UTC): 2012-11-17 05:47:00 UTC

  • CULTURAL OBSERVATIONS : OFFICES WITHOUT PHONES First, cell phone plans and costs

    CULTURAL OBSERVATIONS : OFFICES WITHOUT PHONES

    First, cell phone plans and costs are absurdly cheap here. I think in the states I tend to pay well over a hundred a month, and close to two hundred. During heavy business usage plans run six to fifteen hundred a month. (And yes, I have enough knowledge of the different phone companies to know how much of that is wasted on marketing to customers who are not loyal, and how much poorly our regulators protect us from penalty pricing. In penatlty pricing the profits are made by enticing customers with low prices and setting low limits on account usage and charging absurd penalties for going over those limits. This violates the principle of asymmetry of knowledge. And it ends up sending the lower classes to collection and further charges. So yes, I think it’s a hazard, and yes, I think it violates libertarian property rights.

    Second, when you go into an office here, at least the offices that I’ve been into, it’s just not a given that everyone will have a company provided phone, unless they absolutely need one for their work.

    Desks, as we know them. are places where you can store clerical equipment. they are workbenches for people who calculate abstractions rather than modify the physical world.

    But if you have a laptop and a cell phone (or a laptop and skype) you pretty much can work lying down on a couch, or standing at a bar, or in my favorite repose, sitting in a chair with your feet up. Now the truth is, that comfortable seating inversely proportional the the impact on your health. We need to walk. We compensate by standing at standing-desks. Some of us have discovereed the abdominal value of sitting on an exercise ball at a desk, which works your abs eight ours a day. Most of us sit in chairs at desks, which if we use reasonable posture is bad for our hearts and waistlines, but that’s all. Ohters of us recline in couches and chairs, because all we have to do is talk or write text, and a desk is unnecessary, but this is the worst possible place to put your body if you don’t get up and move around every thirty minutes or so.

    All that said, if we don’t need phones, at least some portion of us don’t need desks. But that’s probably bad for our health. So, the next work environment I”m going to put together will have desks at the perimeter, and lots of lounges for working comfortably, and ad-hoc, with the people that you need to.

    Now, I realize that technologists are a narrow segment. And that technologists don’t necessarily signal using office spaces. But for some of us, it’s just paradise to sit in a comfy chair and crank out our ideas.

    Offices need not be structured around phones.


    Source date (UTC): 2012-11-17 03:37:00 UTC

  • SMITH BRAND LAUNCH After more than a decade, Ascentium finally gets a new name,

    SMITH BRAND LAUNCH

    After more than a decade, Ascentium finally gets a new name, worthy of a digital agency.

    My child has graduated from college. 🙂


    Source date (UTC): 2012-11-17 03:03:00 UTC

  • WANT ONE (Hat tip to Josh Brantley) General argument is that no one will build a

    http://www.autoblog.com/2012/11/16/mercedes-benz-ener-g-force-concept-is-a-g-class-for-the-future/I WANT ONE

    (Hat tip to Josh Brantley)

    General argument is that no one will build anything for popular consumption with tires that large. Because it means a larger axle, larger breaks, higher center of gravity, and very expensive wheels and tires. The Jeep Forty concept has met with the same criticism from the factory: no one will build it because even as an option it will be priced out of the market. Although, given what a G-wagon costs, I don’t think that’s a good argument for a mercedes. And given that it could be released in a military version, I think it’s worth building.

    Keep hope alive.


    Source date (UTC): 2012-11-17 02:59:00 UTC

  • TWINKIES DISAPPEAR FROM THE FACE OF THE EARTH Personally I like snowballs better

    http://www.nbcdfw.com/news/national-international/NATL-Twinkies-Maker-Hostess-Going-Out-of-Business-179643161.htmlCRISIS: TWINKIES DISAPPEAR FROM THE FACE OF THE EARTH

    Personally I like snowballs better than TWINKIES.

    But this means the era of late night twinkies and pepsi from the office vending machine is forever gone. Along with green screens.

    The halcyon days of youth.

    😉


    Source date (UTC): 2012-11-16 10:47:00 UTC

  • THE ERROR IN ROTHBARDS PRAXEOLOGY TO INTRANITIVE PREFERENCES Priceless post. Pre

    http://fensel.net/2012/11/16/intransitive-preferences-and-the-money-pump-argument/TYING THE ERROR IN ROTHBARDS PRAXEOLOGY TO INTRANITIVE PREFERENCES

    Priceless post.

    Preferences are a network – a map, a graph – not a hierarchy or a stack.

    Moreover, when preferences are cleared, the network is satisfied, not the node. Even though we only have visibility into the preference exposed by the physical exchange.

    This is the fundamental problem with praxeological thought that equates the simplicity of commodities for which the network consists of little more than price, with consumer goods that at least within any price range consist largely of signals. And signals consist in no small part, of contributions both supportive and competitive to norms.

    Preferences are not linear, they are sets of values on a graph. And as such, those that appear intransitive are so only because the label that we give to them represents only one item in the (large) set. We make a logical error when we attribute linearity to the label or name, which is only a subset of the values of the set of values that constitute any preference. This confuses the convenience of the label with the inconvenient and often opaque contents of the set.


    Source date (UTC): 2012-11-16 00:46:00 UTC

  • NO ONE KNOWS WHERE THE ECONOMY IS GOING Well. Less so than usual. It’s easy to l

    NO ONE KNOWS WHERE THE ECONOMY IS GOING

    Well. Less so than usual. It’s easy to look smart during a boom. The arrow is in flight. We only need to watch its arc.

    But Europe fell back into recession and its confirmed as of today. And I don’t see why the USA won’t as well. I thought that we’d stimulate like hell but I can’t see any sings that the status quo will change in congress or the fed.

    But I’m not following the numbers. I’m following the people that follow the numbers. And they are quiet and clueless still.

    I was pretty wrong on china. Late on the euro. Early on the states. And right on housing prices. So my record is now mixed.

    But I think I’ll be proven right about structural unemployment. Every contradictory paper I can find presupposes that demand will cause us to sop up people. And I agree a bit. I just don’t agree it’s meaningful. This unemployment will be with us I think.

    When I said 2014 at the earliest followed by the demographic cliff in 2017-2020 I sounded nuts. But it looks pretty rational now. Economics in the end, all other things being equal, is reducible to demographics.

    I stopped fussing with data and started focusing exclusively on political theory about a year ago. And the reason is that I don’t see that anything interesting will occur to get us out of this scenario for a couple of years.


    Source date (UTC): 2012-11-15 20:09:00 UTC

  • DESPITE ITS INFLUENCE, THE FACEBOOK USER INTERFACE DOES NOT GRACEFULLY COLLAPSE

    DESPITE ITS INFLUENCE, THE FACEBOOK USER INTERFACE DOES NOT GRACEFULLY COLLAPSE ONTO PHONES AND TABLETS – AND THE SOLUTION?

    We all know this of course. We also know that this presents a terrible problem for companies that seek to make their revenue from advertising – which decidedly doesn’t work well on phones.

    But then again, the windowed desktop UI model doesn’t work that well any longer either – even on the desktop – and it certainly doesn’t collapse to handheld devices. The web v1 and v2 UI model doesn’t collapse that well either. The newer reflexive UI model, with iPhone controls collapses fairly well – that is, until you try to do anything terribly complicated. Because it’s pretty hard to convey a lot of context, when we’re used to space consuming navigation controls providing all that context, and we don’t have space to work with.

    So it’s a lot of fun to take a few choice elements from FB’s edit-in-place document model, and incorporate them into a reflexive ‘box’ model, and then try to eliminate all the navigation that’s possible while retaining context. Then hopefully allow the graceful re-expansion of the user interface back to a rich desktop, adding just the right amount of context along with the information density.

    And in doing so, make what is essentially an enormous pile of financial software appear like it was downloaded from the Apple store on one hand, and forged in an accounting department on the other.

    When hiring the staff, I told them, “I really wish that I could tell you that we’re building something sexy like a social media music and dating site. But we’re not. We’re building a piece of business management software. And the only thing sexy about it, is that it doesn’t look like it was written in 1992, along with all the rest of financial management software.” And for some reason they still took the job. 🙂

    Somehow it all just works.

    🙂


    Source date (UTC): 2012-11-15 17:39:00 UTC

  • IT’S GREAT TO BE BUILDING A COMPANY AGAIN Building a team. Building a product. W

    IT’S GREAT TO BE BUILDING A COMPANY AGAIN

    Building a team. Building a product. Working fourteen hours a day… simply because you absolutely want to. Watching something beautiful begin to emerge from collective effort. The joy on people’s faces as they solve some problem or other. The comfort that comes from slowly beginning to understand something, and being a part of something.

    Entrepreneurship is tribal. It’s just faster than building a tribe the old fashioned way. 🙂


    Source date (UTC): 2012-11-15 17:12:00 UTC

  • TAXIOMA : AMAZING TAXI APP FOR KIEV. I can’t speak russian or Ukrainian. Taxioma

    TAXIOMA : AMAZING TAXI APP FOR KIEV.

    I can’t speak russian or Ukrainian. Taxioma for the iPhone and google translate and I can get a cheap cab in minutes easily.

    Google translate has a phonetic option that will display Russian in roman characters ( like the signage for the streets here do ). the dispatcher seems to understand it. And using the application, even with my disability seems to be faster that native speakers using the phone. 😉

    I


    Source date (UTC): 2012-11-15 14:05:00 UTC