Profound if you grasp it. https://twitter.com/StevePender/status/1719708944690471146
Source date (UTC): 2023-11-01 16:34:54 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1719754899460628810
Profound if you grasp it. https://twitter.com/StevePender/status/1719708944690471146
Source date (UTC): 2023-11-01 16:34:54 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1719754899460628810
Again, (a) yes, but (b) it turns out he problem is just women voters, or rather single women voters, and there are a lot of them. WIthout single women voters and their instincts, incentives and indoctrinations, none of the leftward motion would have occurred.
Source date (UTC): 2023-11-01 16:29:07 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1719753445215711723
Reply addressees: @teodoriancu14 @nickdixoncomic
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1719752068905242831
It’s only going to get fixed with massive deportations and a radical change in the law preventing harm to the traditions and institutions of the british people.
Source date (UTC): 2023-11-01 16:13:18 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1719749463000932412
Reply addressees: @Josh_Ebner @nickdixoncomic
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1719742710230179852
Oops. Forgot the main point. 😉
Law as in natural law of reciprocity – contractualism.
Not ‘rules’ or ‘commands’ from an authority.
Europe retained trifunctionalism. Because it can with law first. China with state-first developed philosophy instead of religion, but failed at law for reasons I’ve explained elsewehre and why Confucius, failing at politics, failing at law, directed civilization to the family and hierarchy of families and harmony. Where law creates adversarial competition for the benefit of the commons seeking utililty at the cost of disruption. Harmony does not tolerate ‘distruption’. The middle east CONFLATED Religion, law and state. And failed at all three.
Reply addressees: @matthewolivan @whatifalthist
Source date (UTC): 2023-11-01 16:11:22 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1719748980320481280
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1719748174955286632
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
No. The Jewish emphasis on scriptural law was a counter-reaction to greco-roman law oncde t hey saw the effect of it. So they resurrected pre-500bc remnants and adopted the use of the law themselves. You will find almost all semitic behavior after the bronze age collapse, is just reaction to the superiority of the social, political, military, and technological advantages of indo europeans whether iranic, anatolian, or european.
Likewise islam is largely the result of a counter-reaction against the Nicean effort to standardize the bible as law, with a law that was intolerable for the arabs and their tribalism. Before nicea christianity was ascendent in the orient.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1719748174955286632
No. The Jewish emphasis on scriptural law was a counter-reaction to greco-roman law oncde t hey saw the effect of it. So they resurrected pre-500bc remnants and adopted the use of the law themselves. You will find almost all semitic behavior after the bronze age collapse, is just reaction to the superiority of the social, political, military, and technological advantages of indo europeans whether iranic, anatolian, or european.
Likewise islam is largely the result of a counter-reaction against the Nicean effort to standardize the bible as law, with a law that was intolerable for the arabs and their tribalism. Before nicea christianity was ascendent in the orient.
Reply addressees: @matthewolivan @whatifalthist
Source date (UTC): 2023-11-01 16:08:10 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1719748174846304256
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1719743787205800135
Megan,
I understand that common people like yourself are easily triggered by academic speech. It’s because you do not understand the context in which we are using the term – a term that in academic prose refers to “the indo-european peoples.” Why? Disambiguation to prevent the kind of conflation and inflation you are using at the moment.
We demonstrate the evolution of western civilization’s group strategy from its origin on the Steppe (Aryan) to the Corded Ware Culture, to the Anatolian, Greco, Roman, to the Germanic, to the West Germanic, to the Anglo Saxon Norman, and finally the english invention of the Modern State.
The text you are quoting is an attempt to illustrate the evolution of the european peoples’ traditions from their origin, to the classical, to the christian to the modern in poetic form. We have found this form is the most memorable in distinguishing the difference in values of the different eras.
So your ‘gossiping shaming rallying and moralizing’ is just an attempt to slander our organization out of your own ‘uneducated’ ignorance.
We would appreciate an apology. If we don’t recieve one we may comfortably act to compel one.
There is no more moral program on this earth than the one we propose, nor one that would produce greater equality and prosperity for our people. Our primary goal is to extend the laws against fraudulent speech from the commercial to the political sphere, thereby restoring the ability of our people to engage in democratic discourse.
And your defamation only works against our efforts to solve the crisis of the age that slowly drags us toward a deterministic and unrecoverable civil war, at the same time the remaining agrarian empires that survived the first and second world war, are chafing at the opportunity to destroy the prosperity and opportunity that our previous generations (not yours) have sought to produce by nation states, natural law, human rights, and free trade – at the cost of the advantages of our middle, working, laboring classes.
Sincerely,
Curt Doolittle
The Natural Law Institute
The Science of Cooperation
Reply addressees: @NebraskaMegan
Source date (UTC): 2023-11-01 16:02:38 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1719746782165405696
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1717251337073684984
I study different causes. And I avoided conspiracy theories. The reason being that I only look for incentives. And I understand people will exploit available incentives. Conversely if you do not know that, and you are overly fascinated by conspiracies, you will see them as more influential than they are. And blame people for their natural tendency to follow incentives – instead of ensuring that there are no available incentives to exploit.
I work with incentives. I understand humans are mostly animals, some are bots, and only a tiny fraction of us are fully agentic human beings.
Reply addressees: @Lord__Sousa @WerrellBradley
Source date (UTC): 2023-11-01 15:47:48 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1719743049067057152
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1719733956885569631
RT @ThruTheHayes: @curtdoolittle https://twitter.com/CitizensForRes2/status/1719732799123460123
Source date (UTC): 2023-11-01 15:44:10 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1719742133249204482
https://twitter.com/CitizensForRes2/status/1719732799123460123
Yes. Though only a handful of us understand both what that means and how profound it is.
Source date (UTC): 2023-11-01 14:09:07 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1719718212340740277
Reply addressees: @StevePender
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1719708944690471146
I live to serve. 😉
Source date (UTC): 2023-11-01 14:07:33 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1719717819418337436
Reply addressees: @TjGrant44647146 @whatifalthist
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1719691403112906927