Curt Doolittle

Author: Curt Doolittle

  • Is Philosophy A Vehicle For Theft?

    Is nearly all of philosophy then, outside of logic, an artful construct for the purpose of justifying theft? One can justify suppression of, prevention of, and restitution for, the taking of discounts. (thefts) One can justify the selection of one priority of investment over another. But one cannot argue for the necessity of a monopoly of investments. Nor the mandatory enforcement of participation in investments, other than the suppression of free riding. One can argue the necessity for a homogeneity – monopoly – of property rights for the purpose of logically resolving disputes over property and contract – albeit, private property solves that problem, and articulated shareholder rights, retains that ability even under complexity. But once a monopoly of property rights exists, one cannot argue the necessity for a monopoly of law making. In fact, logic and evidence suggest precisely the opposite is true: that laws evolve and evolve best under the common law, since they must be interpreted by ordinary citizens, and are open to constant revision without external approval as the world evolves. The failure of the common law was (a) its usurpation by the state, and (b) failure to define property rights sufficiently in the face of industrialization. (c) its use by the middle class to dispossess the aristocracy, and consequential use by the proletarians and feminists to dispossess the middle classes. Philosophy is quite simple really. It’s only complicated if you’re trying to lie. And theft requires lying. And lying is best covered by obscurity. Cheers.

  • ENGLISH ARE NOT A DIVERSE PEOPLE – JUST THE OPPOSITE. The north sea was a “lake”

    http://dienekes.blogspot.com/2014/02/human-admixture-common-in-human-history.htmlTHE ENGLISH ARE NOT A DIVERSE PEOPLE – JUST THE OPPOSITE.

    The north sea was a “lake” whose shores were inhabited by related families.

    —

    “The case of Northwestern Europe appears especially striking as none of the populations from the region show evidence of admixture.”

    “England is diverse only in the minds of pretentious historians.”

    We really are ‘different’. ‘Cause we’re all the same. Whooda’ thunk it. 😉

    Source date (UTC): 2014-02-14 15:30:00 UTC

  • ENGLISH ARE NOT A DIVERSE PEOPLE – JUST THE OPPOSITE. The north sea was a “lake”

    http://dienekes.blogspot.com/2014/02/human-admixture-common-in-human-history.htmlTHE ENGLISH ARE NOT A DIVERSE PEOPLE – JUST THE OPPOSITE.

    The north sea was a “lake” whose shores were inhabited by related families.

    —

    “The case of Northwestern Europe appears especially striking as none of the populations from the region show evidence of admixture.”

    “England is diverse only in the minds of pretentious historians.”

    We really are ‘different’. ‘Cause we’re all the same. Whooda’ thunk it. 😉

    Source date (UTC): 2014-02-14 15:29:00 UTC

  • VOTING MORALLY EVEN IF ITS EXPENSIVE, IS VOTING RATIONALLY (minor criticism of t

    VOTING MORALLY EVEN IF ITS EXPENSIVE, IS VOTING RATIONALLY

    (minor criticism of the myth of the rational voter)

    People do vote rationally. Its rational to vote morally even at high personal cost.

    I dont have time to refute the part Kaplan got wrong. But it should be obvious that he got it wrong.

    The failure of economic thought is currently one of insufficient tribalism and insufficient nationalism.

    Any group that votes immorally will be exterminated by groups that vote morally.

    That is why the anglo world is dying: its immoral (reproductively destructive).

    Source date (UTC): 2014-02-14 11:22:00 UTC

  • If you eliminate free riding in all its forms: violence, theft fraud, omission,

    If you eliminate free riding in all its forms: violence, theft fraud, omission, obscurantism, externalization, socialization, privatization, corruption, conspiracy and conquest – then the only action remaining available to man is the voluntary exchange of private property.

    Cooperation is only possible if we suppress all free riding. Thats what cooperating means.

    Source date (UTC): 2014-02-14 09:43:00 UTC

  • ARE MAKING A RHETORICAL DENT IN THE POLITICAL UNIVERSE One paragraph, post and a

    http://www.theimaginativeconservative.org/2014/02/modern-marriage-revolution-regression-monogamy.htmlWE ARE MAKING A RHETORICAL DENT IN THE POLITICAL UNIVERSE

    One paragraph, post and argument at a time.

    This fellow, has picked up on the message now.

    Matriarchy is natural. It’s what we escaped in order to reverse universal rent seeking, and create prosperity.

    Source date (UTC): 2014-02-14 07:06:00 UTC

  • WE NEED A NEW MATHEMATICAL REVOLUTION ON THE SCALE OF CALCULUS : THE UNIT OF COM

    http://shar.es/QBhQ0YES WE NEED A NEW MATHEMATICAL REVOLUTION ON THE SCALE OF CALCULUS : THE UNIT OF COMMENSURABILITY IN THAT MATHEMATICS, IS PROPERTY, AND ITS GRAMMAR IS MORAL

    The mathematical order of big data? Property.

    1) Humans (life) is acquisitive.

    2) Humans seek to acquire a limited number of categories of things. from experiences (feelings), to information, affection, mates, associates, and all manner of material things.

    3) Human seek to avoid losses – more so than to acquire. especially life, children, kin, and mates, but also anything else that they have acted to acquire.

    4) Humans must cooperate, and seek to cooperate, in the pursuit of their acquisitions.

    5) The problem of cooperation for humans(all life) outside of kin, is the prevention of, and suppression of, free riding (involuntary transfer)

    6) Humans develop layers of complex rules (myths, traditions, habits, manners, ethics, morals, and common laws) to assist in cooperating in whatever structure of production they exist under.

    6) All human language can be expressed in a grammar. Even the most complex and abstract ideas can be expressed in the grammar of acquisition and cooperation we commonly call ‘property’: “That in which we have acted to acquire, and the moral (legal) constraints under which we have done it.

    (I kind of wonder if this allows us to get past the comprehension limits of juries. At present, the trick is to have enough money, to afford to overwhelm the cognitive processing ability of the jury. It may be possible to analyze for example, a large trial, and produce a mathematical reduction of it, into terms that the jury can comprehend. The trial is still required, but we can reduce its complexity to an analogy to experience.)

    Source date (UTC): 2014-02-14 03:48:00 UTC

  • CRAZY COMMERCIAL ACTIVITY The Winter Break is over. I have had six board room ph

    CRAZY COMMERCIAL ACTIVITY

    The Winter Break is over. I have had six board room phone conversations today, one after the other, with totally different companies.

    (My physical and mental health seems to have returned. I’m almost at full gear again. Time to start a weight program now. Everything is SO much easier when you’re healthy. Trying to be smart when you’re desperately ill is traumatizing. )

    Source date (UTC): 2014-02-13 15:11:00 UTC

  • UKRAINIAN HUMOR (fun) –Man prays to God: “Dear God. Why are girls so sweet and

    UKRAINIAN HUMOR

    (fun)

    –Man prays to God: “Dear God. Why are girls so sweet and wonderful and women so b_tchy and mean?” God responds: “Because I made girls and you made women.” —

    (ouch.. laughed pretty hard at that one. almost fell over.)

    A woman just told me this ‘parable’ in exchange for criticizing her b*tchy-ness. 🙂

    Source date (UTC): 2014-02-13 13:22:00 UTC

  • ARTICLE THIS YEAR TO DATE: ARISTOCRACY AS A MODEL FOR SECESSION

    http://libertarianalliance.wordpress.com/2014/02/13/can-aristocracy-and-its-feudal-roots-offer-a-prospect-and-model-for-secessionist-solutions-to-the-present-crisis-in-britain/BEST ARTICLE THIS YEAR TO DATE: ARISTOCRACY AS A MODEL FOR SECESSION

    Source date (UTC): 2014-02-13 12:57:00 UTC