Author: Curt Doolittle

  • ARGUMENT IN FAVOR OF “PARLIAMENTARY COMMON LAW” It’s not a practical time for bi

    ARGUMENT IN FAVOR OF “PARLIAMENTARY COMMON LAW”

    It’s not a practical time for big political ideas, but in a country like Ukraine, that probably DOES need a parliament, it would be very helpful to use lottocracy to elect ‘citizen judges’, selected by lot, from each district, to approve any law voted on by the parliament. Say, 12 citizen jurors for each representative. This essentially places common law requirements on the legislature. Use standard jury selection processes. As a citizen judge you must only vote in favor of a law if you understand it, it does not violate the constitution and it is good for your country.

    That is the best protection OTHER than NO GOVERNMENT that we can come up with, Direct democracy is a good idea but it is also terribly open to corruption, whereas juries whose actions are taken in public are not as easily corrupted as you think.

    This makes each citizen have a personal stake in the law.


    Source date (UTC): 2014-02-23 09:45:00 UTC

  • MARCH 1ST :REQUEST FOR VOLUNTEERS TO CLEAN UP MAIDAN Well, I was too much of a c

    MARCH 1ST :REQUEST FOR VOLUNTEERS TO CLEAN UP MAIDAN

    Well, I was too much of a coward to go fight, (and I didn’t feel I had the right to), but I think I’ll go help clean up a bit. At least I’ll feel like I did something to honor the dead and the people who did the fighting, even if it’s really small – even insignificant. I don’t know any other way to show respect for those that did the real work.


    Source date (UTC): 2014-02-23 09:36:00 UTC

  • AS LAWS Having a great, fun, chat with Paul Bakhmut on Slavic superstition and h

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Russian_traditions_and_superstitionsSUPERSTITIONS AS LAWS

    Having a great, fun, chat with Paul Bakhmut on Slavic superstition and he’s connecting the dots for me on the use of superstitions in lieu of laws. It’s genius. I love it. All these superstitions have some useful purpose.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Russian_traditions_and_superstitions


    Source date (UTC): 2014-02-23 09:30:00 UTC

  • WHAT I LEARNED FROM HANS HOPPE? Someone asked me what I learned from Hoppe, accu

    WHAT I LEARNED FROM HANS HOPPE?

    Someone asked me what I learned from Hoppe, accusatorially. that I hadn’t learned elsewhere. And I was so stupefied by it that I couldn’t put it into words that the time.

    But, what I learned from Hans-Hermann Hoppe that I did NOT learn from any other source, was how to construct moral arguments in economic terms. Or rather, that all moral statements were reducible to statements of property, and that, furthermore, economic reasoning was applicable to ALL human behavior.

    Yes, I have to filter out the Rothbardian and Misesian errors. And yes, Hans likes to interject a lot of sarcastic humor or ridicule into his speeches. But in general, the way of constructing arguments with that much rigor reliant entirely on demonstrated ACTIONS not empty VERBALISMS, is unique to libertarianism. It’s unique to Hoppe really. You just don’t find that intellectual rigor anywhere else. He makes almost all academic philosophy look like the work of children by comparison.

    And that’s where my approach got it from – although I tend to think in more Hayekian voice.

    Now, in my work, I have the ADDITIONAL burden of having to describe the CAUSE of liberty, where Hans didn’t. (He didn’t know it.) Where he had only to work with correlation, I have to work with causation.

    And it’s harder to do that. I can’t rely on an assumed natural morality the way he did. Instead I treat human cooperation as a form of rigorous logic – a science. It’s more burdensome. But it works.

    Anyway. Hans solve the problem I was looking for. He solved what we hadn’t solved for 2500 years. And what he DIDN”T solve, I will (assuming I live long enough – cause that’s a hell of an assumption.)

    That’s why I am so indebted to Hans despite the fact that he didn’t directly give me much help. On the other hand, he didn’t need to.

    Curt Doolittle

    Kiev


    Source date (UTC): 2014-02-23 09:23:00 UTC

  • Oborne: “…the House of Commons cannot be relied on to defend traditional Engli

    http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/politics/10191978/These-hereditary-peers-put-our-MPs-to-shame.html?fbPeter Oborne: “…the House of Commons cannot be relied on to defend traditional English liberties or the British way of life. Again and again, the nation has found itself relying on the good sense and sound instincts of the House of Lords, in particular the hereditary element. “


    Source date (UTC): 2014-02-23 09:10:00 UTC

  • “That little militia did more for their freedom than democracy ever had. I think

    –“That little militia did more for their freedom than democracy ever had. I think that’s what I learned from watching Ukrainians revolt.”–

    Curt Doolittle

    The Propertarian Institute

    Kiev.


    Source date (UTC): 2014-02-23 08:35:00 UTC

  • LETTER TO THE BBC – TODAY – IN RESPONSE TO “REQUEST FOR COMMENTS FROM KIEV” (int

    LETTER TO THE BBC – TODAY – IN RESPONSE TO “REQUEST FOR COMMENTS FROM KIEV”

    (interesting insight) (class and diversity)

    –“I live in downtown Kiev. I have for a year and a half. And it might be interesting to relate how I have been affected, at least intellectually, by the protests.

    I think we could help both western journalists and the populace they serve (as well as various State departments) if they would understand one of the vast differences between Ukrainian (and Russian for that matter) cultures and our own.

    Somewhat like the Nordic countries, but very UNLIKE the germanic and anglo countries, Ukrainians do not really consider themselves as participants in a class war. While status signals are about all we seem to seek to collect in the west, here in Ukraine, status signals are something you collect personally, but not on behalf of a class.

    The near destruction of class warfare was perhaps the only benefit of the soviet system. It worked. Whereas, in the west, we are still trying, to create the ‘Aristocracy of Everybody’ that was the unstated promise of the enlightenment in its Anglo, Anglo-American, German and French versions.

    The Ukrainian society is, despite its fracture along geographic lines, language lines, religious lines, and political lines, NOT fractured along class lines.

    And without this constant class and status warfare by everyone, people don’t demonize each other. They aren’t frustrated with each other. And even as a low-trust society, they don’t necessarily mistrust each other. Instead, they think and act as an extended family.

    As such there just isn’t all that pent up anger and frustration that we have in anglo countries – since it’s IMPOSSIBLE to create an aristocracy of everybody – many people become frustrated at the conflict between the promise of upper middle class life, and the reality that western countries form normal distributions. That just doesn’t happen here.

    Ukraine is tribally heterogeneous, but not necessarily culturally heterogeneous. Certainly less different than Quebecois and Anglo Anglos in Canada. Even in Canada the conflict is more over the class differences between the French who were predominantly from the continental lower classes, and the english who were not. In america the conflict is increasingly between married protestants with two incomes that can maintain middle class status, and everyone else.

    The Ukrainian people reserve their anger and frustration for the corrupt government and do not display it toward one another. In fact, they are extremely civil and loving (despite absurd levels of alcohol consumption and zero prohibition on fist-to-cuffs). They have a nobility and pride that we have lost in our constant great game of class warfare.

    The uncomfortable truth we westerners (particularly in the Anglosphere) must learn to deal with is that homogenous small societies demonstrate tolerance for greater redistribution and intolerance for class warfare. And that diverse, large societies resist redistribution and encourage class and culture warfare. In small homogenous polities, the government is a vehicle for cooperation. In large heterogeneous polities the government is a vehicle for class and cultural competition.

    I am not sure we should be so proud of ourselves in the Anglo world. Ukrainians formed a militia in 90 days out of hand-made armor, surplus military gear, motorcycle and hockey gear, baseball bats, pipes, and a few weapons that they stole from the police and military.

    That little militia did more for their freedom than democracy ever had.

    I think that’s what I learned from watching Ukrainians revolt.”–

    Curt Doolittle

    The Propertarian Institute

    Kiev.


    Source date (UTC): 2014-02-23 08:32:00 UTC

  • It’s really strange to me, living here, how CLUELESS western governments and rep

    It’s really strange to me, living here, how CLUELESS western governments and reporters are. I mean, reading the western media, is embarrassing. The implied superiority and pontification is insulting.

    What I didn’t grasp before living here was how much status signaling was contained in western propaganda.

    It’s pathetic really.

    (Dear: Max Romanenko thank you for mentoring me on the ‘real’ history of this part of the world.)


    Source date (UTC): 2014-02-23 07:59:00 UTC

  • DEMOCRACIES ARE VOTE FARMS AND PARASITES ARE THE CHEAPEST PRODUCT TO RAISE

    DEMOCRACIES ARE VOTE FARMS AND PARASITES ARE THE CHEAPEST PRODUCT TO RAISE.


    Source date (UTC): 2014-02-23 07:15:00 UTC

  • (last night)(crowded)(inspiring)

    (last night)(crowded)(inspiring)


    Source date (UTC): 2014-02-23 07:09:00 UTC