Author: Curt Doolittle

  • I DIDN’T REALIZE THE POWER OF MY ARGUMENT AGAINST LIBERTARIAN PERCEPTION OF REAL

    I DIDN’T REALIZE THE POWER OF MY ARGUMENT AGAINST LIBERTARIAN PERCEPTION OF REALITY.

    But that’s the final nail in the coffin of praxeology. If we are morally blind (and science says that we are) for the reasons that I’ve stated (genetics, reproductive strategy, discounting of the dependence upon others for information and opinion, and higher intelligence discounting of transaction costs) then that which is possible to apprehend in the context of voluntary exchange, is open to, and the victim of, cognitive biases – just like all other judgements.

    As such, the logic of cooperation must forever be empirically and instrumentally derived as a theoretic construct, and can only be treated as theoretic construct, not an axiomatic one. (Given the strict difference between axiomatic-non-correspondent-with-reality and theoretic-correspondent-with-reality systems.)

    So I have finally put an end to the argument that ethics, and the logic of cooperation are axiomatic, and we can discard praxeology.

    Have to run now, but I’ll continue with this argument over the next month or two as I refine it further.

    Curt Doolittle

    The Propertarian Institute

    KIev


    Source date (UTC): 2014-04-11 08:26:00 UTC

  • CULTURAL OBSERVATIONS : GAY LIFE IN KIEV You know, Ukrainian’s get a lot of flac

    CULTURAL OBSERVATIONS : GAY LIFE IN KIEV

    You know, Ukrainian’s get a lot of flack over their supposed intolerance of gays. But I don’t see any evidence of it. The Butch college girls sitting next to me look and act just like they do in in the west. They could be from Seattle given the way they’re dressed – particularly the girl with blue hair.

    It might be that I live in one of the university districts, but the gay men here are just a little less flamboyant at attracting attention than their american counterparts. But ALL Ukrainians are less flamboyant and seeking of attention than their American counterparts. They have these strange things called ‘extended family’ and ‘real friends’, and daily participation in ‘social life’ that they get attention from, rather than living in McBoxes, surrounded by ‘stuff’ and dependent upon media for a sense of membership in a group that gives them positive status rewards. (Strange as it is, Americans are outliers in this regard – aliens to the rest of the world.)

    You can’t celebrate being gay, which is to force it into the social and political realm. And you certainly can’t politicize it. You can’t politicize much of anything here really. Politicizing anything is (rightly) considered an attempt to gain privileges of some sort – and attention. Both of which are not ‘Ukrainian’ values.

    I mean, my ‘hairmaster’ (hairdresser) would look right at home in San Francisco or Seattle – both of which are pretty friendly to gender differences.

    RACISM VS GAY LIFE

    I see the very clear genetics of every damned tribe from the Urals to the western Celts in this city. It’s absolutely beautiful, and a crucible for the study of european tribalism. But it’s pretty clear that there is a very big difference between the western Indo European/Uralic, Turkic, Afro-Asiatic (Arabic), African cultures and the third group: East asians, and southeast asians. And while in the states our history with slavery has forced us to attempt equality, it’s pretty clear here that ‘troublemakers’ are not desirable. But why are they considered ‘troublemakers?’ Well, for the same reason blacks and hispanics in the states and muslims and Romanians in the UK, and Turks in Germany are considered ‘troublemakers’: because statistically it’s true.

    All clubs do exercise “Face Control”, which means that if your face would reduce the desirability of the club then they’ll reject you. You don’t have any ‘rights’ per say to enter a business. Nor they to serve you. The clubs just protect their brand value.

    A lot of turkic and arabic men come to Kiev trying to find women. A very few black men. (A lot of ‘douchebag’ Americans do too, and that’s just one of the reasons that I avoid the expat community like lepers. A trip to the Embassy is all I need to remind me how pathetic fat, ignorant and privileged americans are.) Yes, Ukrainian women are absolutely the best women in the world. It’s true. It’s one of those things that’s just inconceivable to people who haven’t lived here. And because of the open sexuality (pervasive display of feminine confidence, pride, desirability and power) a lot of men think that these women will be ‘easy’. Which is pretty much the opposite of the truth. Women are more honest here. But you must COURT them. They ‘give it up’ a lot less easily than in the west. They just do it honestly. Sure, it’s a lot easier to have a fling with an attached woman here, and it appears to me that italian-style ‘mistresses’ are pervasive, family is still the center of all personal life. And courting a woman is a matter of determining your potential as a family member. (I think I have that right. The generations differ a bit. But I think I have that right.)

    And like any society, especially one where so many men are ‘useless, unproductive, alcoholic, and lazy’ a less desirable, but aggressive, higher testosterone male, who is willing to court, can pick up marginal and below the margin women here, who are vastly superior to the women they could find at home.

    Unfortunately, they’re considered ‘creepy’, profane and rude. So the clubs use ‘Face Control’ to keep the places ‘desirable and safe’ for women. Women in turn draw men. And that’s the economics of clubs.

    COMPARISON

    So I tend to look at these things the same way: society is just a big extension of the FAMILY and families here – not a corporation. So within your ‘family and circle’ you can do whatever you want. But politicking aside from criticizing the corrupt government seems to pretty much reject particularism of any kind.

    It’s actually a means of enforcing the local perception of equality.

    Given that all political privileges are by definition thefts, I have to pretty much agree with how things are done here.

    If it weren’t for the pervasive political corruption and soviet-induced absence of the rule of law, then this would be one of the most desirable societies on earth.

    Curt Doolittle

    Kiev.


    Source date (UTC): 2014-04-11 08:13:00 UTC

  • INSURGENCIES HAVE SOMETHING IN COMMON: THEY WIN. —“Although transnational insu

    http://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/141107/david-malet/foreign-fighters-playbook?cid=soc-tumblr-in-snapshots-foreign_fighters_playbook-040914%22–TRANSNATIONAL INSURGENCIES HAVE SOMETHING IN COMMON: THEY WIN.

    —“Although transnational insurgencies comprise highly diverse groups across different conflicts and eras, they still have much in common. For one, such forces are winning: transnational insurgencies have won nearly half of the civil wars in which they have fought, almost twice the success rate of insurgencies overall. Several Israeli prime ministers have acknowledged that Israel’s victory in 1948 relied on the World War II veterans who aided the fledgling state against Arab armies. In other conflicts throughout history, prominent foreign fighters were either instrumental in extending insurgencies or making them costlier to suppress: the Marquis de Lafayette, the French general who fought for the American rebels during the Revolutionary War; the Italian general Giuseppe Garibaldi, who supported the Republican uprising in Brazil in the 1830s; and Abu Musab al-Zarqawi, who formed al Qaeda in Iraq under the U.S. occupation. “—

    –“The patterns of recruitment for such disparate fighters are broadly similar and, because of that, they all have the same Achilles’ heel…. Insurgent groups … use despair rather than optimism to recruit members. Generally, they tell recruits that they are losing a war of survival and that they face an existential threat.”–

    –“It might not seem like the most persuasive pitch, particularly for fighters who, if they join, must violate a number of laws and take up arms in an unfamiliar territory. But it works. …. The strategy works best with foreign recruits who share the movement’s ideology, ethnicity, or religion but who, unlike local fighters, do not have immediate communities and families in the line of fire.”–

    –“Such fighters are often persuadable because of their weak affiliations with their own country and national identity,”–

    –” In these conflicts, the foreign fighters, driven by the belief that they are fighting a desperate battle to the end, act more aggressively than local insurgents — even when their side is actually winning. It’s no accident that most suicide missions in Afghanistan and Iraq were carried out by foreign fighters rather than local militants. “–

    –“Some insurgent groups, such as the Islamic State of Iraq and al-Sham (ISIS) and Jabhat al-Nusra in Syria, have taken advantage of this dynamic by using foreigners to target civilians when the local combatants will not. “–


    Source date (UTC): 2014-04-10 16:16:00 UTC

  • OCCUPY (CONQUER) THE WHOLE OF UKRAINE” If Russia had something positive to add t

    http://24tv.ua/home/showSingleNews.do?putins_main_aim__occupy_whole_ukraine_kwasniewski&objectId=431334&lang=en”TO OCCUPY (CONQUER) THE WHOLE OF UKRAINE”

    If Russia had something positive to add to the world, rather than as a source of corruption, brutality, and poverty, then that would be one thing. But Russia is a net negative influence on everything it touches.


    Source date (UTC): 2014-04-10 15:18:00 UTC

  • democracy, diversity is ‘a bad’

    http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/politics/2014/04/demographics_conservatism_and_racial_polarization_could_america_become_mississippi.htmlUnder democracy, diversity is ‘a bad’.


    Source date (UTC): 2014-04-10 13:57:00 UTC

  • Nicolás Gómez Dávila Skye turned me onto Davila today. After reading a bit of hi

    Nicolás Gómez Dávila

    Skye turned me onto Davila today. After reading a bit of his work it’s pretty clear that he’s against modernity and in favor of mysticism. But I did managed to pull a few gems together:

    –“Liberty is not an end, but a means. Whoever mistakes it for an end does not know what to do once he attains it.”–

    –“Perfection is the point where what we can do and what we want to do coincide with what we ought to do”–

    –“Violence is not necessary to destroy a civilization. Each civilization dies from indifference toward the unique values which created it.”–

    –“Modern man does not love, but seeks refuge in love; does not hope, but seeks refuge in hope; does not believe, but seeks refuge in a dogma.”–

    —“Civilization is a poorly fortified encampment in the midst of rebellious tribes.”—

    –“Love of the people is an aristocratic calling. The democrat only loves the people at election time.”–


    Source date (UTC): 2014-04-10 13:19:00 UTC

  • JUSTIFICATION VS EXPLANATION (ethics) 1) Rothbardian ethics: How to justify both

    JUSTIFICATION VS EXPLANATION

    (ethics)

    1) Rothbardian ethics: How to justify both private property, and private theft by deception and parasitism.

    2) Public Choice Theory (Social Democracy) : How to justify public theft by pseudoscience and parasitism.

    3) Hoppe’s Anarcho Capitalism : How to justify private property, and eliminate the monopoly bureaucracy and the state.

    4) Aristocratic Egalitarianism : How to resolve all *possible* conflicts via the common law, and eliminate all demand for the state – no justification is needed.

    All I did was base Hoppe’s deductions made from Argumentation on science and reason, rather than pseudoscience (praxeology) and rationalism.

    Curt Doolittle

    The Propertarian Institute

    Kiev


    Source date (UTC): 2014-04-10 11:06:00 UTC

  • “Absolute Nuclear Family”, (“A.N.F.”, “ANF”)

    http://isteve.blogspot.com/2012/07/absolute-nuclear-families.html?m=1DEFINITION: “Absolute Nuclear Family”, (“A.N.F.”, “ANF”)


    Source date (UTC): 2014-04-10 09:22:00 UTC

  • STRUGGLING This damned problem is just frustrating me. I know it’s because I don

    STRUGGLING

    This damned problem is just frustrating me. I know it’s because I don’t feel well and I’m tired. But I cannot quite get my arms around how to easily communicate all these different causal axis. I must make it easier to understand moral rules, transaction costs of immorality, and the consequential demand for state intervention. If I can do a better job of that, then it will be more obvious that the common law must correspond to morality en toto (crime, ethics and immorality), not just aggression against intersubjectively verifiable private property.

    It seems like I should be able to do it with a graph. But I must be able to make a better narrative first. If I cannot articulate it as human action I’ll have failed my own criteria for moral claims.

    Years ago I would struggle to get the most basic ideas across. Now at least I only struggle with the most complex. Decades of slow progress to improve my weakness.

    I knew I had something sitting out there to block me. I just didn’t see this one coming.


    Source date (UTC): 2014-04-09 18:41:00 UTC

  • THE POPULAR WILL : MURDER –“…our civilization rests on the death of two perso

    THE POPULAR WILL : MURDER

    –“…our civilization rests on the death of two persons: a philosopher (Socrates) and the Son of God (Jesus), both victims of the popular will.”– Madariaga


    Source date (UTC): 2014-04-09 18:35:00 UTC