Cause there isn’t one. 😉 lol
Source date (UTC): 2023-11-03 20:07:54 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1720533281697898909
Reply addressees: @SaitouHajime00
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1720532770483789872
Author: Curt Doolittle
-
What is propaganda? “Social Constsruction of A Falsehood”. What genetic predispo
What is propaganda? “Social Constsruction of A Falsehood”. What genetic predisposition favors social construction? The feminine mind. Who is most succeptible to social construction and most manipulated by social constructions? Women. And among women who is most successfully manipulated? Single women without children.
Women mature a bit earlier sexually but only mature cognitively when they have three or more children. Men mature later but as soon as they have responsibilty to other men for any form of capital. Sex differences in the same thing: just different capital that is managed by different means. 😉 Really. Nature is dumb and simple. It really is that simple.Reply addressees: @APutins
Source date (UTC): 2023-11-03 20:07:18 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1720533129327181824
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1720531660783989201
-
I’m missing something because I don’t know what ‘us’ you’re referring to. I refe
I’m missing something because I don’t know what ‘us’ you’re referring to. I referred to ‘we’ meaning those of us who study sex differences in cognition.
I know a great deal about sex differences in neurology and expression and there is zero chance I’m stating anything that’s not in the science (even if it’s a taboo subject). My work is prmiarly in sex differences in lying because I had to discover and explain the left (cognitively feminine) bias better than others (Joh Haidt) has.Reply addressees: @parrhesiatruth @bryanbrey @lporiginalg @DarnelSugarfoo
Source date (UTC): 2023-11-03 20:04:41 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1720532471232512000
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1720527908551135675
-
Ok. Again. Sex differences in cognition. Resulting NAXALT/AXALT fallacy. No man
Ok. Again. Sex differences in cognition. Resulting NAXALT/AXALT fallacy.
No man interprets a statemetn about human beings (or anything else) as other than a normal distribution.
If we represent half the world (actually slightly more) as having a strong bias against rationalism (full accounting for costs over population time and space), that means a distribution, but a tendency of the majority, or at least a tendency of those who influence outcomes (which in this case is what matters.)
Only a woman (or very effeminate man) would immediately react with a NAXALT/AXALT fallacy. It’s one of the primary means of detecting sex differences in text and speech.
So you’re demonstrating my point.
(Which is exasperating – I understand)
But it’s quite simple that empathizing doesn’t scale, and systematizing doesn’t account for individuals. And thats the cognitive division of labor evolution discovered was what we needed to survive.Reply addressees: @parrhesiatruth @bryanbrey @lporiginalg @DarnelSugarfoo
Source date (UTC): 2023-11-03 20:01:30 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1720531668946026496
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1720527766251033044
-
Correct
Correct.
Source date (UTC): 2023-11-03 19:56:06 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1720530312168382500
Reply addressees: @PatrociniuMundi
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1720529465992736999
-
^ Note that this post was originally censored by X-Twitter and subsequently reve
^ Note that this post was originally censored by X-Twitter and subsequently reversed.
While we are very cautious in following X-Twitter rules, sometimes academic prose will trigger the AI’s or users. And this is worse when our members post from different cultures with different sensitivities and taboos.
Thankfully Twitter (X) is doing a better job at distinguishing between academic prose and hate speech. Making it safe for adult conversation about matters of substance using academic prose that may infer other than it’s contextual meaning to the common folk.
We run into this all the time by the way.
I tend to use “East Asian, European, South Eruasian, African, and Hybrids” whenever I make statements about racial groups. These names are purely geographic and have no ‘baggage’.
The problem occurs when we have to reference older terminology, especially terminology that’s wrong (such as Caucasian), in the context in which it was developed (as the post I’m commenting on demonstrates).Reply addressees: @NatLawInstitute @whatifalthist @BigSisterCynthi
Source date (UTC): 2023-11-03 19:55:51 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1720530245785153537
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1720495929248100597
-
Exactly. Prostitutes in particular. The density of bodies is highest near brothe
Exactly. Prostitutes in particular. The density of bodies is highest near brothels. 😉 Children that were left for exposure leave no record as animals and weather quickly eradicate the evidence.
Also this was a very taboo behavior and subject throughout history because it was…
Source date (UTC): 2023-11-03 19:42:23 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1720526859119526122
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1720524793504571440
-
What percentage of women were prostitutes especially in cities? What percentage
What percentage of women were prostitutes especially in cities?
What percentage of children are not from the husband of the wife giving birth.?
What percentage of child mortaility was infanticide?
What percentage of infanticide was due to the already existing duress of not having enough food- which is the primary stress for all of human history.
Hansel and Gretel is a true story of the fears of children – and it wasn’t a stepmother but a mother in the original story. Mother was not always the saintly figure we have constructed in the abrahamic religoius narrative.
I had this discussion with someone recently who was unable to even find the two most recent archeological discoveries that demonstrated the degree of infanticide by women. Given that this is a ‘sensitive subject’ I understand why people are unaware of it. But that doesn’t mean all of us are unaware of it – and horrified by it.Reply addressees: @brightfeathermf @bryanbrey @lporiginalg @DarnelSugarfoo
Source date (UTC): 2023-11-03 19:40:45 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1720526445246578688
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1720519665208688679
-
Not an argument. I do R&D on decidability and deception for a living. Try to mak
Not an argument.
I do R&D on decidability and deception for a living.
Try to make an argument.
So far you can’t.
Source date (UTC): 2023-11-03 19:36:34 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1720525392618950814
Reply addressees: @MorctheOrc
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1720519785421701620
-
(BTW: thank you for being you instead of one of ‘those’ women. I don’t think wom
(BTW: thank you for being you instead of one of ‘those’ women. I don’t think women appreciate just how MUCH men appreciate good (responsible) women.)
Source date (UTC): 2023-11-03 19:35:51 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1720525216110014532
Reply addressees: @parrhesiatruth @bryanbrey @lporiginalg @DarnelSugarfoo
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1720520666342932914