UNIVERSITIES AND COLLEGES SHOULD WARRANTY THEIR PRODUCTS, AND WE SHOULD SUE THEM FOR THE FAILURE OF THEIR PRODUCTS TO PERFORM. [T]he state gives the universities protection from suits. For selling non-performing products. (But then, the government is a monopoly that forces us to buy its services too.) Q: “Should a college education be offered to all people or to just a certain group of people?” “Should” is an interesting question. “College Education” is a loose term. “Offered” is a questionable term. The data suggest we send way too many people to college and way too few people to apprenticeship programs. Just statistically speaking, if it takes a 110-115 IQ to complete liberal arts education that means that we should be only educating `10-20% of the population and the rest should get vocational training rather than liberal arts training. Now that said, if colleges and universities had to warrantee their products, rather than sell non performing products, say, by getting x% of your payroll for 30 years, then we could drop tuition fees altogether, loans altogether, and let universities borrow to cover float (receiveables) themselves. This would rapidly change the university system from just another parasitic quasi-governmental bureaucracy, to a market driven organization. University costs and administrative costs would plummet, and courses woukd be outcome oriented. This is the best idea for solving the problem of parasitic but useless university degrees. We know now that we learn nothing at university if value. All they do is sort and filter the population.
Author: Curt Doolittle
-
"We Must Develop Political Institutions For The People We Have, Not Those We Wish We Had"
REFORMULATION OF “WE MUST DEVELOP POLITICAL INSTITUTIONS FOR THE PEOPLE WE HAVE, NOT THOSE WE WISH WE HAD” “Observation of individual men would never have led to the formulation of the static conceptions upon which the democratic edifice is founded, such as justice, equality, fraternity, order. These are based not on the traits of living men but upon schemes for the aggrandizement of mere thought-creations – “humanity”- “mankind.” Indeed the “characteristics of men” – are something to be explained away, something to be overcome in the interests of “mankind.”” – Dora Marsden
-
“We Must Develop Political Institutions For The People We Have, Not Those We Wish We Had”
REFORMULATION OF “WE MUST DEVELOP POLITICAL INSTITUTIONS FOR THE PEOPLE WE HAVE, NOT THOSE WE WISH WE HAD” “Observation of individual men would never have led to the formulation of the static conceptions upon which the democratic edifice is founded, such as justice, equality, fraternity, order. These are based not on the traits of living men but upon schemes for the aggrandizement of mere thought-creations – “humanity”- “mankind.” Indeed the “characteristics of men” – are something to be explained away, something to be overcome in the interests of “mankind.”” – Dora Marsden
-
"We Must Develop Political Institutions For The People We Have, Not Those We Wish We Had"
REFORMULATION OF “WE MUST DEVELOP POLITICAL INSTITUTIONS FOR THE PEOPLE WE HAVE, NOT THOSE WE WISH WE HAD” “Observation of individual men would never have led to the formulation of the static conceptions upon which the democratic edifice is founded, such as justice, equality, fraternity, order. These are based not on the traits of living men but upon schemes for the aggrandizement of mere thought-creations – “humanity”- “mankind.” Indeed the “characteristics of men” – are something to be explained away, something to be overcome in the interests of “mankind.”” – Dora Marsden
-
“We Must Develop Political Institutions For The People We Have, Not Those We Wish We Had”
REFORMULATION OF “WE MUST DEVELOP POLITICAL INSTITUTIONS FOR THE PEOPLE WE HAVE, NOT THOSE WE WISH WE HAD” “Observation of individual men would never have led to the formulation of the static conceptions upon which the democratic edifice is founded, such as justice, equality, fraternity, order. These are based not on the traits of living men but upon schemes for the aggrandizement of mere thought-creations – “humanity”- “mankind.” Indeed the “characteristics of men” – are something to be explained away, something to be overcome in the interests of “mankind.”” – Dora Marsden
-
Untitled
http://www.theguardian.com/books/2012/mar/05/five-hundred-fairytales-discovered-germany
Source date (UTC): 2014-06-25 09:50:00 UTC
-
“It is better to reduce our statements into actions or events that exist, rather
—“It is better to reduce our statements into actions or events that exist, rather than into objects or entities that we imagine”–
Source date (UTC): 2014-06-25 07:34:00 UTC
-
ANOTHER FLYNN EFFECT? (strange) I dunno. This is a bit weird. And I feel a bit s
ANOTHER FLYNN EFFECT?
(strange)
I dunno. This is a bit weird. And I feel a bit strange saying it. But it makes sense.
I think that if you work with Propertarianism enough, that it produces some sort of flynn-like effect that spills over into everything you think about. Just as physical sciences reduce the world to general rules and everyone seems to get smarter because of it, Propertarianism reduces the world of human experience to a few simple general rules, and I notice the difference in myself.
Everything is easier to figure out. Everything. Everything seems to be ‘obvious’.
Clarity. When you look at the chapter outline of the book, a little like Human Action, or maybe Hume’s work, just the outline itself is an argument – that makes sense.
You wanna know something else weird? The field that was most under threat from accusations of pseudoscience, reformed more so than any other field, including Physics. Seriously. The only field to fully implement the scientific method in fully operational terms is experimental psychology.
And I was wondering why experimental psychology surpassed economics and even is keeping ahead of cognitive science. Why?
Operationalism.
Source date (UTC): 2014-06-25 06:15:00 UTC
-
REFORMULATION OF “WE MUST DEVELOP POLITICAL INSTITUTIONS FOR THE PEOPLE WE HAVE,
REFORMULATION OF “WE MUST DEVELOP POLITICAL INSTITUTIONS FOR THE PEOPLE WE HAVE, NOT THOSE WE WISH WE HAD”
Source date (UTC): 2014-06-25 06:00:00 UTC
-
HOW TO RAPIDLY BECOME A BILLIONAIRE? (seriously) (worth reading) Its been done.
HOW TO RAPIDLY BECOME A BILLIONAIRE?
(seriously) (worth reading)
Its been done. Secret? Threaten a big company’s revenue stream or customer base, by providing a service better than they do.
Why is that possible? Internal incompetence of bureaucracies. Why? Because brands always seek to facilitate the brand with tangential value rather than deliver a product or service in the most excellent way possible for consumers regardless of brand. Almost all companies make this mistake, Apple and Microsoft included.
Dropbox should never have had a chance. But every other large organization failed by trying to “leverage”. That is a fallacy.
Beats threatened Apple. Multiple companies threatened Facebook.
Unfortunately management falsely understands the leverage as risk mitigation rather than risk amplification.
Make it excellent. Threaten them over their mistakes.
That is how you become a billionaire in short fashion.
Thankfully I don’t care to be more than a millionaire. I do my threatening of paradigmatic fallacies with political philosophy and for me that is a greater reward. 🙂
(Please Share so we see what people say. ;). )
Source date (UTC): 2014-06-25 05:59:00 UTC