Curt Doolittle

Author: Curt Doolittle

  • APART – FOR GOOD REASONS. I have spent my life studying this problem and arrived

    http://www.salon.com/2014/07/04/we_the_people_are_violent_and_filled_with_rage_a_nation_spinning_apart_on_its_independence_day/COMING APART – FOR GOOD REASONS.

    I have spent my life studying this problem and arrived at a much more simplistic conclusion: that it is diversity and scale that are the cause of our conflict, and only dissolution of the empire, and devolution of the central government’s power to the states, that reflect regional values will cure the ill. The european project is failing precisely because of different values exemplified by the protestant north, catholic south, and orthodox east. Not that these religions are the cause, but the values of the different polities, their family structures, their degree of trustworthiness, and their different levels of taste for corruption. The natural course of a divided people on a vast land is to choose between chinese and russian totalitarianism, or european small-statism. And given the empirical evidence, the european model produces the highest trust, most redistributive, polities on earth. Diversity of states is apparently good, and diversity within a state is apparently bad. The reason being that diversity decreases trust. This does not apply only to ethnic diversity, but to political diversity.

    The cure is dissolution of the empire, and devolution of the central government, not the construction of a new monopoly religion to rival christianity or islam – which is the secular religion that the author is promoting consciously or not.

    No one implements totalitarianism out of ill intention, but out of desire for the suppression of conflict. However, the opposite cure for suppression of conflict is secession and devolution of central power.

    But then, as far as I know, only progressives want totalitarianism. Both in American and everywhere else.

    Interestingly, out of all factions, its the Tea Party that recommends the devolutionary solution. Strange as it may seem, they are the ones who are correct.

    Source date (UTC): 2014-07-05 01:18:00 UTC

  • "God's Three European Languages"

    GOD’S THREE EUROPEAN LANGUAGES AND THE CHURCH RESORTS TO ONE [U]nfortunately Socrates’s criticism applies to all of academia. Or in the new vernacular, all members of the neoreactionary’s ‘Cathedral’ – the replacement of the church and academy with the state and academy under a bizarre form of numerical and technological heresy. I was thrilled at the church’s restoration of the exorcists today. When the church re-institutes the Templars or Hospitallers and we warriors have moral sanction to restore the church’s property, and the church as opponent to the state, we will rescue not only the church, but the west itself. But without that sanction the church will continue to decline, and the west with it. The problem being that the church needs a new knightly order, and to be in an position of desperation. [M]y current belief is that mysticism is more important to the church than philosophy. And the talents in the church more suitable to mysticism than philosophy. And the third world, not Europe, the church’s economic and intellectual interest. As such the church will not save Europe, and ceases to be a european institution other than ceremonially. The church created Europa and at present the church may be the only means of saving it. In Europe god speaks three languages: the science and history of warriors, the reason and allegory of protestants, and the mythology and passion of the catholics. The church no longer speaks the languages of god. And Europa is abandoned by her church because of it.

  • “God’s Three European Languages”

    GOD’S THREE EUROPEAN LANGUAGES AND THE CHURCH RESORTS TO ONE [U]nfortunately Socrates’s criticism applies to all of academia. Or in the new vernacular, all members of the neoreactionary’s ‘Cathedral’ – the replacement of the church and academy with the state and academy under a bizarre form of numerical and technological heresy. I was thrilled at the church’s restoration of the exorcists today. When the church re-institutes the Templars or Hospitallers and we warriors have moral sanction to restore the church’s property, and the church as opponent to the state, we will rescue not only the church, but the west itself. But without that sanction the church will continue to decline, and the west with it. The problem being that the church needs a new knightly order, and to be in an position of desperation. [M]y current belief is that mysticism is more important to the church than philosophy. And the talents in the church more suitable to mysticism than philosophy. And the third world, not Europe, the church’s economic and intellectual interest. As such the church will not save Europe, and ceases to be a european institution other than ceremonially. The church created Europa and at present the church may be the only means of saving it. In Europe god speaks three languages: the science and history of warriors, the reason and allegory of protestants, and the mythology and passion of the catholics. The church no longer speaks the languages of god. And Europa is abandoned by her church because of it.

  • "God's Three European Languages"

    GOD’S THREE EUROPEAN LANGUAGES AND THE CHURCH RESORTS TO ONE [U]nfortunately Socrates’s criticism applies to all of academia. Or in the new vernacular, all members of the neoreactionary’s ‘Cathedral’ – the replacement of the church and academy with the state and academy under a bizarre form of numerical and technological heresy. I was thrilled at the church’s restoration of the exorcists today. When the church re-institutes the Templars or Hospitallers and we warriors have moral sanction to restore the church’s property, and the church as opponent to the state, we will rescue not only the church, but the west itself. But without that sanction the church will continue to decline, and the west with it. The problem being that the church needs a new knightly order, and to be in an position of desperation. [M]y current belief is that mysticism is more important to the church than philosophy. And the talents in the church more suitable to mysticism than philosophy. And the third world, not Europe, the church’s economic and intellectual interest. As such the church will not save Europe, and ceases to be a european institution other than ceremonially. The church created Europa and at present the church may be the only means of saving it. In Europe god speaks three languages: the science and history of warriors, the reason and allegory of protestants, and the mythology and passion of the catholics. The church no longer speaks the languages of god. And Europa is abandoned by her church because of it.

  • “God’s Three European Languages”

    GOD’S THREE EUROPEAN LANGUAGES AND THE CHURCH RESORTS TO ONE [U]nfortunately Socrates’s criticism applies to all of academia. Or in the new vernacular, all members of the neoreactionary’s ‘Cathedral’ – the replacement of the church and academy with the state and academy under a bizarre form of numerical and technological heresy. I was thrilled at the church’s restoration of the exorcists today. When the church re-institutes the Templars or Hospitallers and we warriors have moral sanction to restore the church’s property, and the church as opponent to the state, we will rescue not only the church, but the west itself. But without that sanction the church will continue to decline, and the west with it. The problem being that the church needs a new knightly order, and to be in an position of desperation. [M]y current belief is that mysticism is more important to the church than philosophy. And the talents in the church more suitable to mysticism than philosophy. And the third world, not Europe, the church’s economic and intellectual interest. As such the church will not save Europe, and ceases to be a european institution other than ceremonially. The church created Europa and at present the church may be the only means of saving it. In Europe god speaks three languages: the science and history of warriors, the reason and allegory of protestants, and the mythology and passion of the catholics. The church no longer speaks the languages of god. And Europa is abandoned by her church because of it.

  • SOMETHING MAY BE USEFUL BUT IT MAY NOT BE TRUE Many utilitarian concepts are con

    SOMETHING MAY BE USEFUL BUT IT MAY NOT BE TRUE

    Many utilitarian concepts are convenient, but not true. Most untrue things produce negative externalities. Most negative externalities cause others harm. Small things in large numbers produce vast consequences.

    Source date (UTC): 2014-07-04 16:35:00 UTC

  • FAILURE TO USE OPERATIONAL DEFINITIONS IN ECONOMICS, POLITICS AND LAW IS CRIMINA

    FAILURE TO USE OPERATIONAL DEFINITIONS IN ECONOMICS, POLITICS AND LAW IS CRIMINAL.

    (Profound)(reposted)(worth repeating)

    While a failure to rely upon operational definitions in mathematics, logic and philosophy may only be immoral, and in science unethical – in economics, politics and law it is criminal.

    In Mathematics avoiding operationalism merely perpetuates an error; in logic and philosophy it is deceptive of both others and one’s self; in science wastes others’ time. But in economics, politics and law, failure to use operationalism creates theft.

    That is the answer to the riddle Mises, Rothbard, and Hoppe couldn’t solve in economics and ethics. Nor Hayek and Popper and their followers in politics and philosophy. But then, neither did Bridgman and his followers in science, nor Brouwer and his followers in math. I don’t think the long list ending with Kripke solved it either in logic.

    One cannot use this heavily loaded term ‘true’ as other than analogy without a constructive knowledge of its meaning. And the only meaning that is constructively possible is testimony: performative truth. All else is merely proof. And the quaint linguistic contrivance that conflates the most parsimonious possible theory with testimony is, much like multitudinous abuses of the verb to-be, nothing more than a means by which we obscure our ignorance as a means of making mere analogies as a substitute for truth claims. Only constructive proofs demonstrate that one possesses the knowledge to make a truth claim. Everything else is merely analogy.

    Source date (UTC): 2014-07-04 16:33:00 UTC

  • Jan 01, 1992Tech company popular in the NW during the 90’s.Place: Bellevue, Wash

    Jan 01, 1992Tech company popular in the NW during the 90’s.Place: Bellevue, Washington (47.6172, -122.199)Address: Bellevue, Washington 98004

    Source date (UTC): 2014-07-04 16:25:00 UTC

  • Jan 01, 2001Digital Technology and Marketing AgencyPlace: Bellevue, Washington (

    Jan 01, 2001Digital Technology and Marketing AgencyPlace: Bellevue, Washington (47.6172, -122.199)Address: Bellevue, Washington 98004

    Source date (UTC): 2014-07-04 16:23:00 UTC

  • ARISTOCRACY AND TRIBALISM Dude, I do not think of people’s race except in descri

    ARISTOCRACY AND TRIBALISM

    Dude, I do not think of people’s race except in descriptive terms, the same way I point out the color of a shirt, car or house when describing it. There are great men. If I have to think of the person’s race to determine if they are great men, then they aren’t. Either a man carries his water or he doesn’t. His race doesn’t matter. If he makes it matter, then unfortunately I have to make it matter too.

    One of the reasons that I find Aristocracy so appealing, is that it’s appealing to EVERY TRIBE out there. It’s GOOD FOR ALL tribes. It doesn’t matter if this tribe or that tribe has better or worse individuals. What matters is that aristocracy can construct the educational and commercial order necessary for that tribe to participate in the global economy.

    The only reason race is a problem, is the denial of it, and the fantasy that all our tribes are equal. They aren’t any more equal than families are equal or classes are equal. We’re just not equal in our traits. But we are equal in the market where we are anonymous and invisible to one another, and equal in our interests in helping one another.

    Aristocracy around the world is the same. It’s the bottom 3/4 of any tribe that is materially different, and its in their interests and possibly in mankind’s interest to be genetically different.

    The only reason to desire large numbers is to conquer people or colonize people according to your favorite biases.

    I can’t for the life of me understand how the world would not be better constructed of 5M person city states rather than 1 billion person empire-states, except that big states can conduct bigger wars.

    If the head of tribe/state X race Y talks to the head of tribe/state A race B get together it probably will work out just fine if they want to conduct a trade. But the minute tribe C tries to increase its dominion nothing good comes out of it except war.

    Source date (UTC): 2014-07-04 15:00:00 UTC