Author: Curt Doolittle

  • (intrigue) (AI) ??(operationalism)?? AI test reveals machines will lie to one an

    (intrigue) (AI) ??(operationalism)??

    AI test reveals machines will lie to one another to compete. Is there any operational significance to this?


    Source date (UTC): 2014-07-05 22:30:00 UTC

  • guy is 21, and the perfect entrepreneur. The reason I think his story is valuabl

    http://digg.com/video/meet-new-yorks-youngest-truffle-dealerThis guy is 21, and the perfect entrepreneur. The reason I think his story is valuable to share, is that, he’s a master of his niche. And largely, entrepreneurship requires mastery of something that few other people master.


    Source date (UTC): 2014-07-05 21:09:00 UTC

  • OPPORTUNITY APPROACHES : ANOTHER CRASH Political Opportunity. Radical Political

    OPPORTUNITY APPROACHES : ANOTHER CRASH

    Political Opportunity.

    Radical Political Opportunity

    —…[The] cyclically adjusted price-to-earnings ratio (CAPE) … the so-called Shiller PE, is currently well above its long-term average of 17 and approaching levels that previously presaged doom for equities. Shiller has plotted CAPE going back to 1881 and notes (with some alarm) it has only been higher than current levels three times: In 1929, 2000 and 2007.”—-

    I thought it would take until 2020 for another cycle to play out but I didn’t anticipate all this nonsensical flooding of the markets with cheap money. Eventually someone has to figure out that Krugman and Delong are wrong , and that Austrians are right, and that we’re running out of options.

    The only choice is liquidation – of the corporations (states) that are bankrupt.


    Source date (UTC): 2014-07-05 19:45:00 UTC

  • PROPERTARIANISM IS A OF LOGIC OF COOPERATION, NOT A PHILOSOPHICAL PREFERENCE. Pr

    PROPERTARIANISM IS A OF LOGIC OF COOPERATION, NOT A PHILOSOPHICAL PREFERENCE.

    Propertarianism can be used to describe, compare, and advocate any political system in rigidly logical, universally commensurable form.

    While one can surely advocate liberty with it, its primary purpose is to suppress error, fallacy and deception.

    Its the logic of cooperation. The logic of ethics and politics.

    Aristocratic Egalitarianism can be argued with it. Which I do every day.

    And AE is the most ethical political model yet developed.

    But propertarianism only allows me to argue in favor of it logically and truthfully – to construct proofs.

    But preference for any given political order is still one if choice.


    Source date (UTC): 2014-07-05 19:19:00 UTC

  • AMAZING INSIGHT TONIGHT Drifting off to sleep. Woke with a start. Figured out op

    AMAZING INSIGHT TONIGHT

    Drifting off to sleep. Woke with a start. Figured out operational definition of Karl Popper’s work vs anglo empirical tradition.

    Its a difference in ethics. Alex Naraniecki was right. Popper is a Cosmopolitan. Implicit cosmopolitan ethics. Inescapable.

    Reverse Russian and operationalists were correct. Popper is correct in the sense that he means ‘try any way to get there you can think of, then harden it’. Whereas the operationalists an intuitionist say ‘try any way to get there that you can think of then construct a proof of it.” The Popperian form of truth is individualistic and utilitarian, and the anglo empirical form of truth is political.

    When I tested the argument that production, technical, and scientific methods were the same. That we just valued different outputs from the scientific method, I was right.

    I didnt expect the cause of so much difference in philosophy to be one of ethics. But once we discover that the underlying question is the nature of truth, then the differences in philosophical frameworks become obvious expressions of cultural differences in ethics.

    We spent a century looking for a logical answer that was in the end an ethical one.

    Our metaphysical judgements frame everything we do.

    Fuck. I did it.

    The world is a different place starting tomorrow.

    Damn.


    Source date (UTC): 2014-07-05 19:11:00 UTC

  • Operations are not analogies. That’s what’s great about them. No information los

    Operations are not analogies. That’s what’s great about them. No information loss, no information ‘gained’ that isn’t there.


    Source date (UTC): 2014-07-05 15:50:00 UTC

  • (TRIBE) NOT IDEOLOGY (GOVERNMENT) IS MOVING THE WORLD. Or let me put it this way

    http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/fareed-zakaria-identity-not-ideology-is-moving-the-world/2014/07/03/631ff338-02d7-11e4-8572-4b1b969b6322_story.htmlIDENTITY (TRIBE) NOT IDEOLOGY (GOVERNMENT) IS MOVING THE WORLD.

    Or let me put it this way first:

    Tribalism is more important than ideology, since we’ve all adopted some form of consumer capitalism.

    Or let me put it this way second:

    The nonsense that america is an ‘idea’ (an ideology) is dead, and likewise, america’s tribes are asserting themselves in reaction to the death of ideology.

    A friend reminded me tonight that The Big Sort continues, and that americans are moving into culturally and tribally oriented areas. Meanwhile, we are also reproducing into castes on a scale that has never been possible before.

    The old political order of the nation state cum-heterogeneous empire, cannot survive this change. so we will either see more empire (tyranny) or more tribalism (city states). I prefer the latter, obviously.


    Source date (UTC): 2014-07-05 15:27:00 UTC

  • If we had as few as 100 guys making propertarian arguments in media, the way rus

    If we had as few as 100 guys making propertarian arguments in media, the way russians make propagandism, and rothbardians manufacture nonsense, we could effect the political debate.

    People are not really all that stupid. Propertarianism allows us to make very clear arguments. It may take a few repetitions for those arguments to ring true. But they will.

    I don’t know how long it will take to get 100 people capable of at least reciting propertarian arguments as talking points, because while the basic ideas are very simple, the number of nonsense arguments put out by progressives, rothbardians, classical liberals, and well meaning fools is hard to defeat.

    But staying on message works. It’s just time and effort once you have the message.


    Source date (UTC): 2014-07-05 15:11:00 UTC

  • PUBLIC INTELLECTUALS NOT PUBLIC PARASITES “The character of the presidency is su

    PUBLIC INTELLECTUALS NOT PUBLIC PARASITES

    “The character of the presidency is such,” the British journalist Henry Fairlie wrote in 1967, “that the majority of the people can be persuaded to look to it for a kind of leadership which no politician, in my opinion, should be allowed, let alone invited, to give. ‘If people want a sense of purpose,’ [former British Prime Minister] Harold Macmillan once said to me, ‘they should get it from their archbishops.’”


    Source date (UTC): 2014-07-05 14:09:00 UTC

  • More On Salon's "Coming Apart" Article (Response 2)

    MORE ON COMING APART : SALON’S ARTICLE : RESPONSE 2 DECEPTIONS IN THIS ARTICLE 1) NATION: A ‘nation’ describes a body of people with similar genetic, linguistic, cultural, normative, and religious properties. When we discuss a diverse populace we do not use the term nation, we use the term EMPIRE. All diverse states must be either federations(voluntary and excitable) or empires (involuntary and non-exitable). If a diverse body of people contains a minority that cannot succeed then it is an empire. China is an empire. America is an empire. Labeling the USA as a nation is a dishonest attempt to label a heterogeneous voluntary polity with the legitimacy of a homogenous nation state, when in fact, it is merely a heterogeneous empire with a record of violence to oppress attempts at secession. 2) MORAL AND “CHOICE” RATHER THAN ECONOMIC AND “POSSIBLE” ARGUMENTS —“Yet somehow the republic kept experiencing what Lincoln called “a new birth of freedom,” thanks only partly to the fortuitous confluence of two oceans’ protection, a vast continent’s ever-alluring frontier and unending streams of aspiring immigrants:”— Lets not be dishonest here, and cast this as a moral argument. The reason for American economic success is that the colonists used british weapons and might to conquer a continent, then steal that continent for themselves. Then sell it off to immigrants, and profit from it. It has been the most profitable conquest and sale of a territory in history. Even today, for all intents and purposes, the american economy consists largely of the housing business. As the housing business goes, so does the american economy. The problem is that we have run out of immigrants from high trust societies, from nuclear family societies, from empirical societies, from rule of law societies, and from truth-telling societies. And contrary to dogma, the evidence is that immigrants from these cultures are not adapting to the (a) absolute nuclear family (b) meritocracy (c) self-supporting productivity (d) minimal statism, (d) civic society, (e) common language, that was what was required of immigrants in order to participate in the american dream of having land so that one could control one’s destiny. WIthout those norms and habits, america has evolved from a polity of ideas, to a simple empire of increasing totalitarianism as the productive classes are slowly farmed to service the unproductive classes, and single motherhood and requisite poverty of single motherhood, has now reach near majority status. Thousands of years of suppressing single motherhood and its endemic poverty and dependency have been reversed in less than a century. 3) ECONOMIC TRUTH vs MORAL JUSTIFICATION Economic history is the only form of truth we can extract from the past. Humans justify their wants, given the conditions that they live under. This article is not much different from ‘god wills it’ because its arguments are allegorical and moral, with a thin veneer of rationalism. Whereas a scientists would look at the economy, the incentives, and demonstrated human behavior and dismantle the authors entire line of argument as a series of childlike justifications of pre-cognitive, non rational, counter-productive human cognitive biases – just as easily as he could dismantle the composition of a rock by mass spectrometry, and just as accurately. The truth is quite different. Humans act as tribes, and these tribes make best use of the circumstances that they can to increase their status and reproductive ability. SOme of theses strategies are successful (rapid population expansion of poor peoples) and some are unsuccessful (progressive status seeking at the expense of child bearing). Time determines winners, not words. Words are used to deceive. We deceive in order to steal. The only true words are operational words. Everything else is analogy. And almost all analogy is a lie.