http://www.wnd.com/2014/07/america-no-longer-1-nation-1-people/BREAK UP THE EMPIRE NEWS: BUCHANAN SUGGESTS WE WILL BREAK UP. (Yay!!!)
Source date (UTC): 2014-07-16 01:30:00 UTC
http://www.wnd.com/2014/07/america-no-longer-1-nation-1-people/BREAK UP THE EMPIRE NEWS: BUCHANAN SUGGESTS WE WILL BREAK UP. (Yay!!!)
Source date (UTC): 2014-07-16 01:30:00 UTC
Second strange male problem of the day.
I know this is Ukraine. But FFS, this is a family hotel. And the damned waitresses here look like strippers. I mean, they have these enormous platform heels, bikinis with sequins, and this pretend-skirt-thing. And they also have ‘that look’: they’re thin but the skin hangs because they haven’t any muscle under it. Like they spent their 20 year lives sitting on bar stools smoking and getting nourishment from coffee.
It’s freaking CREEPY. I am sitting in the bar where I get waited on by the men. Eek.
Do you know that in London every restaurant and shop plays music so loud that you want to leave? And here in the ukraine they play this ukrainian pop that’s really all polka-beat dance music.
Creepy. OK? It’s a 5 star hotel. But I don’t care how nice the hotel is. The music, the stripper-look-alikes and it’s just …. creepy. FFS.
(Ok. I’m not gonna get more work done today apparently.)
Source date (UTC): 2014-07-15 13:52:00 UTC
What pray tell, is the material difference, between individual anarchic males, and the male heads of noble families, each of whom are peers, not above the other, and cannot question that fact without pain of death?
Source date (UTC): 2014-07-15 06:53:00 UTC
ALWAYS HAVE WEAPONS
The law that is enforced is determined by the men with weapons.
Therefore, always have weapons.
Source date (UTC): 2014-07-15 06:38:00 UTC
In every chapter I use:
A Number (of the chapter)
An Image (a symbol – this is hard)
A Title (usually just a term)
A propertarian axis – almost poetic. (Aphoristic poetry perphaps?)
A quote (or poetic excerpt that conveys the simple meaning)
A Statement (an assertion in analytic language)
An Argument. (the rational argument.)
And after that will follow historical examples (if I ever can get to that part, since it’s not really necessary. I might also just use mythological stories. That might be more meaningful.).
Source date (UTC): 2014-07-15 06:36:00 UTC
Strange male problems.
I am sitting here by the pool trying to work, and this woman keeps standing next to me using both hands to squeeze her breasts together to get the water out of her swimsuit top – and getting me wet.
I dont mind the water. But every time she does it nine billion neurons in my brain fire a very primitive language and I forget what the heck I was thinking about.
Sigh.
Source date (UTC): 2014-07-15 05:35:00 UTC
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/foodanddrink/10210327/McDouble-is-cheapest-and-most-nutritious-food-in-human-history.html?utm_content=buffer30eda&utm_medium=social&utm_source=facebook.com&utm_campaign=bufferYep. Progressive pseudoscience to the contrary
Source date (UTC): 2014-07-15 05:26:00 UTC
“Knowledge” like “red” is the name of an experience, not an action, or an object. Recorded knowledge, or more accurately instructions for the recreation of knowledge, is different from the experience of knowledge.
So while it is verbally convenient to refer to mebers of a category with the same term, one cannot then treat all members of a category as identical.
Logic without operational defunitions is an endlessly meaningless word game.
Parlor game.
Nonsense.
That said, yes it is possible to record operations necesssry to reconstruct the experience we refer to as knowledge.
Source date (UTC): 2014-07-15 04:16:00 UTC
Curt Doolittle shared a photo.
Source date (UTC): 2014-07-15 04:04:00 UTC
( omg, you would not believe what I figured out this morning. wow. truth rocks.)
Source date (UTC): 2014-07-15 02:36:00 UTC