(The term “race” was often used to refer to a people. It was only with darwins unification of the world that we came to see the four priomary races of man. So it depends on the usage. If we are strict no, if traditional yes.)
Source date (UTC): 2023-11-05 19:06:20 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1721242563506569392
Reply addressees: @DustinofApollon @99MO23
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1721233830403776923
Well, Haeckel was wrong a lot because he made unsupported leaps. He was a Lamarckian, he denied the common human origin, thought humans evolved in india, and he was quite silly in many ways trying to unify religion in science and art – to be consistent with religion instead of religion to be consistent with science and art. So I would have to understand how you mean thet term. Because I cant tell if you are confusing selection with drift or not?
The sequence is generally:
Regulation (expression)
Mutation (content)
Result (Neutral,Beneficial/Harmful, usually Neotenic/Not.)
Selection (Natural selection by survival and reproduction)
Drift (spread in a small population)
Drift Explained
Evolutionary drift, often referred to as genetic drift, is a mechanism of evolution that refers to random fluctuations in the frequencies of alleles (variants of a gene) within a population. Unlike natural selection, which is a non-random process where alleles become more or less common due to their effect on the reproductive success of their bearers, genetic drift is random and can increase or decrease allele frequency even if they have no impact on the survival or reproduction of individuals.
Here are key points about genetic drift:
Small Populations: Genetic drift is most pronounced in small populations, where chance events can lead to large changes in allele frequencies from one generation to the next.
Bottleneck Effect: This is a form of genetic drift where a population’s size is significantly reduced for at least one generation, often due to a catastrophic event, causing a loss of genetic variation. The resulting gene pool may not be reflective of the original population’s gene pool.
Founder Effect: Another form of genetic drift occurs when a new colony is started by a few members of the original population. The small population size means that the new population may have significantly different allele frequencies than the original population, often leading to reduced genetic diversity.
Random Change: In genetic drift, allele frequencies can change in a population due to random sampling errors. This means that some alleles may become fixed (reach a frequency of 1) while others may be lost entirely from the gene pool, regardless of their effects on the phenotype or fitness.
Non-adaptive Evolution: Genetic drift is a non-adaptive process. Unlike natural selection, which “selects” for traits that confer a reproductive advantage, genetic drift can change allele frequencies in a population even if the changes are neutral or slightly deleterious.
Loss of Genetic Variation: Over time, genetic drift can lead to the loss of genetic variation within populations, which can make them more susceptible to extinction due to reduced adaptive potential.
Evolutionary Significance: While genetic drift is a random process, it plays a significant role in evolution alongside natural selection, particularly in small populations and over long periods of time.
It is important to note that while genetic drift can lead to evolutionary change, it does not work towards optimization or improvement of a species in any directed manner. It is a stochastic effect that contributes to the evolution of populations in a way that is not inherently beneficial or harmful.
Reply addressees: @ObsidianLining
Source date (UTC): 2023-11-05 19:04:24 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1721242076631760896
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1721236765346771079
Homo Sapiens Sapiens and The Four Species (or subspecies) of Man
(Unsolicited and possibly out of context reply that may be relevant or not: a species is determined by an adaptation in a geography that produces a signal for a preference in reproductive selection.
It does not mean the species cannot interbreed – that takes a very long time. While there are clearly at least four human species (races), it is also true that humans are the most adaptive and innovative in every respect including reproduction (human males will hae sex with anything they can get their ‘hands’ on or.. parts in so to speak), so that the combination of mobility, adaptability to geography and climate, and sexual adaptability promote both speciation and subsequent hybridization. Yet humans retain an obvious sexual preference for the neotenic sequence (hierarchy) of the species.
My only point here is to reinforce that species are not limited to reproductive impossibility, but identification of compatibility(general) and selection (precise) – and when the term species is applied to humans we violate the rules use for determining all other species.
Compare with chimps/bonobos etc.
(which might be offensive but it helps clarify the first point).
Source date (UTC): 2023-11-05 16:05:05 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1721196947267104768
I don’t want to disagree with the message. I want to only disagre with the first point and to add context.
–“1)Whenever you try to assimilate you’re not enough”–
This one statement isn’t true. In fact the opposite is repeatedly true. The problem is the term ‘assimilation’. It means full assimilation, not maintaining separatism. Jews have assimilated in many countries – at least some portion of them have. Even in the USA pre-war it was a joke that Presbyterians and Jews we becoming indistinguishable (scotts being penny pinchers)
Secondly, there are no conditions where the jews were expelled where they hadn’t created extraordinary incentives for the people to expel them. I’m not alone in that ‘Jews pretend they had no history before 1500’ because they seek to erase it.
I’ve done extensive work on this in order to PREVENT further conflict (and worse). But once you understand why they are both successful economically and cast out, it’s not envy or jealousy but profiting from baiting into hazard.
We can fix this problem by outlawing those practices (I’ve done the work) regardless of who does them (and how the sexes manifest them).
That’s the way to end the conflict. End the cause of the conflict. By outlawing that which we are permissive of, but then accumulates in conflict.
Reply addressees: @whatifalthist
Source date (UTC): 2023-11-05 16:04:34 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1721196818040512512
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1720855371277877250
–“1)Whenever you try to assimilate you’re not enough”–
This one statement isn’t true. In fact the opposite is repeatedly true. The problem is the term ‘assimilation’. It means full assimilation, not maintaining separatism.
Jews have assimilated in many countries – at least some portion of them have. Even in the USA pre-war it was a joke that Presbyterians and Jews we becoming indistinguishable (scotts being penny pinchers)
Reply addressees: @whatifalthist
Source date (UTC): 2023-11-05 16:00:23 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1721195764095803392
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1720855371277877250
Homo Sapiens Spaiens and The Four Species (or subspecies) of Man
(Unsolicited and possibly out of context reply that may be relevant or not: a species is determined by an adaptation in a geography that produces a signal for a preference in reproductive selection.
It does not mean the species cannot interbreed – that takes a very long time. While there are clearly at least four human species (races), it is also true that humans are the most adaptive and innovative in every respect including reproduction (human males will hae sex with anything they can get their ‘hands’ on or.. parts in so to speak), so that the combination of mobility, adaptability to geography and climate, and sexual adaptability promote both speciation and subsequent hybridization. Yet humans retain an obvious sexual preference for the neotenic sequence (hierarchy) of the species.
My only point here is to reinforce that species are not limited to reproductive impossibility, but identification of compatibility(general) and selection (precise) – and when the term species is applied to humans we violate the rules use for determining all other species.
Compare with chimps/bonobos etc.
(which might be offensive but it helps clarify the first point).
Source date (UTC): 2023-11-05 16:05:05 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1721195069548445697
(http://Gab.com)
I’m officially off http://Gab.com, and my account is deleted.
I’m happy they’re doing well. I was happy paying the fee.
But I can’t develop an audience there worth the effort.
And the nitwit-midwit and dark triad types wear me out – they do here…
Source date (UTC): 2023-11-05 15:41:01 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1721190891895832998
(https://t.co/zcGE1OKZqk)
I’m officially off https://t.co/zcGE1OKZqk, and my account is deleted.
I’m happy they’re doing well. I was happy paying the fee.
But I can’t develop an audience there worth the effort.
And the nitwit-midwit and dark triad types wear me out – they do here too, but I just use the block feature.
While Twitter-X (https://t.co/i2EzQz8AbU) has work to do to surpass our ability to create an audience on facebook, I’m solidly behind musk’s vision. And I hope that the suppression of my work here at least doesn’t increase. 😉
Because honestly, there just isnt any other individual or organization that’s done enough of the hard work to propose reforms that would do anything to stop and reverse the decline of our civilization and our people.
And someone has to do it. And honestly, if someone else did I’d happily go back to building another company or two. 😉
‘Cause, I miss my Ferrari. 😉
Source date (UTC): 2023-11-05 15:41:01 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1721190891681992704
(NLI Humor)
For a guy who supposedly runs this organization I sure seem to have a lot of bosses. 😉
Seriously, though. This management team has largely, on its own, over the past two years, beginning without me as a separate group, turned into quite a bit of a machine, especially with the participation of Francis who is a master of cat-herding. 😉
We’re getting there. And I’d rather have all these bosses than back doing it all myself. (Which is my way of saying thank you to everyone. 😉 )
Humor: so brad just called me to tell me I was late for our working session. And for once, I was up early, made coffee, had breakfast, took care of my emails, tasks, and social media responses. And I had just started preparing our scope of work for today … and the phone rings. And Brad tells me I’m late? I look at the clock and I still have 45 minutes. …. And it turns out it’s the time change this weekend. And so for once, one of my many bosses couldn’t shame me. 😉 … which is usually the case. 😉
PS: just uploaded thursday’s staff meeting, and yesterday’s chat session with brad. I think I’m still behind on one or two videos. Will verify.
Cheers
Source date (UTC): 2023-11-05 15:32:53 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1721188845788520448
lol (thanks) 😉
Source date (UTC): 2023-11-05 14:30:32 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1721173154473681179
Reply addressees: @NWEurasian @BOB37702515
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1721171464731193597