Curt Doolittle shared a photo.
Source date (UTC): 2014-10-16 07:18:00 UTC
Curt Doolittle shared a photo.
Source date (UTC): 2014-10-16 07:18:00 UTC
(personal)
First meaningful hike since I’ve been here. My lungs loved it. So it seems like physical activity is on the menu again – finally. My body has recovered enough now. May not seem much to others, but to me, the ability to hike again is awesome. (and necessary given the awesome food in l’viv)
Today
1) DONE: UI for profile completeness,
2) DONE: UI For personality, moral, and IQ profiles.
3) DONE: Hike “the mountain.” (No idea what the park is called but you can see all of L’viv from the top of it.
4) STARTED: 10K foot API for central server functionality (skills, survey data,financial info.
5) UNDONE Finish outline of Oversing Help for Andreii. Send it to him.
6) UNDONE: Video of “Ancestral Lands”. Add talking points (takeaways). Render it. Publish it.
If I’m lucky: (I won’t be)
7) Banking. Just not happening…. you can only get 1K out of the banking system per person per day. I have no idea how this cash-based economy is functioning at the moment.
Source date (UTC): 2014-10-15 13:56:00 UTC
Ok. This isn’t my thing. I’m just trying to look into the economics and the math of it. But if Ebola really can have a 42 or even 21 day incubation period, that means it’s impossible to know if you have been exposed, and so every sniffle someone gets is suspect. I know people aren’t contagious until they show symptoms, but this long a period means you can’t really isolate people, and that unless you are perfectly healthy you must stay home. I guess we could temporarily criminalize public illness for a while. But it’s almost impossible to control. And with these mortality rates it’s not like 1918 even. It’s very hard to wipe out something with these characteristics. That outbreak had only a 20% mortality rate and killed about 6% of the world population. I don’t really know enough about transmission to have an opinion, but with the extreme level of care needed, that long a a gestation period, the mortality rate, it seems economically devastating just from having to fight it.
Source date (UTC): 2014-10-15 08:57:00 UTC
TABOOS
You know, I look at investigating taboos as intellectual honesty. And I know that makes people a little frustrated with me. But I have to fully explore the intellectual taboos to understand their CONSTRUCTION. So, I don’t think it’s wise to avoid these subjects, as much as it is to understand how and why they are constructed so that we can develop arguments and institutions that solve the REAL PROBLEMS that taboo subjects (ideas, biases, norms) evolved to counter. You cannot solve something by pretending it’s false, or avoiding it because it’s undesirable.
Sometimes you just need to get in there and get your hands dirty.
(Reminds me of that woman who dissects beached whales and can’t get the small off of her for a few weeks afterward… lol).
Most taboos exist for reasons. Good reasons. Most stereotypes are true. That does not mean we should not understand them so that we can find institutional solutions that allow us to replace A-RATIONAL taboos, with rational institutions.
Source date (UTC): 2014-10-15 05:53:00 UTC
Met a new smart fellow today on Linked in of all places: Emil Suric. From Westchester. Finance. (Has good taste btw.) Just started with Deloitte. On the capital track. High reading comprehension. I think Croatian background? Not a lot of info on FB. Lucky to have found him. -Cheers.
Source date (UTC): 2014-10-15 04:13:00 UTC
http://english.alarabiya.net/en/perspective/analysis/2014/10/15/Religious-parties-in-Egypt-threatened-with-political-ban.htmlThe purpose of the state is to resolve conflicts. That is all.
The purpose of religion is to construct norms (common property)
If we were smart, church and state would collect separate taxed once again and church and state would return to their competitive positions. Each limiting the power of the other.
We had it right prior to the enlightenment.
Source date (UTC): 2014-10-15 03:24:00 UTC
THE LOGIC OF DIVORCE
Data suggests that the no fault divorce was one of the worst legislative failures in history.
Now, my view is that we either relegate marriage to the equivalent of a power of attorney, and eliminate common property entirely, or that we return to fault, for the distribution of common property in the event of failure.
Single motherhood is responsible for the rise in inequality, as much as is third world immigration, and the failure of the education system to create competitive labor, and the university system for selling defective and un-warrantied products.
Propertarianism would recommend that we eliminate common property because it is not in fact a commons: that which is unavailable for consumption. As such marital assets cannot be considered a commons since they are available for consumption. And so this law is a deception.
Conversely, fault based divorce increases the risk of exiting the marriage, and increases the incentives for preserving it.
Likewise alimony and child support are both destructive in that they merely ignore the cost of maintaining two households- especially given that males can no longer trade their productivity, while women can still trade their sex and affection.
My intuition is that marriage with high penalty was an extremely useful institution inseparable from Liberty, capitalism, and the civic society. It forces concentration of wealth and it’s highly eugenic when in nuclear and absolute nuclear form.
We are currently practicing the worst of all possible choices.
Source date (UTC): 2014-10-15 03:04:00 UTC
ARISTOCRACY PROVIDES THE ONLY NECESSARY EQUALITY
Aristocracy is geographically portable. It’s the lower classes from which diversity creates ‘Bads’.
Aristocracy can think independently of context (yes, we can measure it). But the lower classes depend upon shared knowledge, shared ethics, shared morality, to act. And it is those differences which cause conflict.
Aristocracy is marginally indifferent in these matters.
So the logical consequence is that the ‘family’ or ‘tribe’ of aristocracy work together for the betterment of their tribes, just as parents in a village work together for the betterment of their children.
Equality divides us. Aristocracy unites us.
It may be counter intuitive, but it’s true.
Source date (UTC): 2014-10-15 02:45:00 UTC
(personal)
Slept 16 hours. Hopefully it was for the purpose of fighting off that flu that is going around. :/
Source date (UTC): 2014-10-15 02:15:00 UTC
Curt Doolittle shared a post.
Source date (UTC): 2014-10-15 01:11:00 UTC