Author: Curt Doolittle

  • TRIBAL VERSUS CONTRACTUAL RELATIONS –“A condition of liberty is not forcefully

    TRIBAL VERSUS CONTRACTUAL RELATIONS

    –“A condition of liberty is not forcefully removing anyone from your tribe and starting interventionist wars with socialists.”–

    I tribe is an involuntary genetic relation.

    A contract is a voluntary legal association.

    If you remove someone from a tribe, that has nothing to do with voluntary legal association, just as removing someone from the property of a voluntary legal association has nothing to do with their tribal membership.

    It is a condition of liberty to remove people from your property.

    It is an impossibility to construct a voluntary relation from an involuntary relation and visa versa.

    If behavior is prohibited it is.

    Mothers evolved dysgenic behaviors as a consequence of producing an irrational sacrificial redistributive moral intuition necessary for the development of highly dependent offspring. Female reproductive strategy is to bear offspring, to further their interests at the expense of the tribe. And to place the burden of their upkeep upon the tribe as frequently as possible – by seeking redistributions, rents and privileges. This intuition is not meaningful except in that circumstance. Even in that circumstance mothers of serial killers, career criminals, socially and reproductive undesirable, as well as unproductive and imbecilic offspring, all demonstrate suspension of disbelief in the merits of their children, and often in the merits of the children of others. This is non-sentient behavior. Conversely, retention of such individuals is a luxury – not a good – by which we satisfy the emotions of such pre-sentient humans. Taken to the extreme, it is dangerous to allow those who would abandon all care-taking of the infirmed in and less able or worse – engage in disregard for the experience of such individuals. Not because these individuals are valuable to mankind, but because people who are careless of others present a risk to us all, and an abrogation of the contract for mutual insurance we demonstrate to all kin out of cooperative necessity.


    Source date (UTC): 2014-11-18 02:08:00 UTC

  • REALLY EASY – ITS BEEN DONE

    http://www.csmonitor.com/2006/0706/p09s01-coop.htmlITS REALLY EASY – ITS BEEN DONE


    Source date (UTC): 2014-11-18 01:40:00 UTC

  • **It’s very hard to produce commons if you’re producing offspring who have no al

    **It’s very hard to produce commons if you’re producing offspring who have no alternative but to parasite upon those commons.**


    Source date (UTC): 2014-11-18 01:38:00 UTC

  • PROPERTARIANISM – ON ANCESTRAL LANDS (SHORT VERSION) (please share) CONTENTS His

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mWu_JDL1DbQVIDEO: PROPERTARIANISM – ON ANCESTRAL LANDS (SHORT VERSION)

    (please share)

    CONTENTS

    Historical Context with Roman Skaskiw.

    Extension of Locke’s Criteria.

    The (Demanding) Criteria for Repossession of Ancestral Lands

    Fuzzy Terms Corrected: “Rights” and “Corporation”

    Government as producer of commons unavailable for privatization.

    The Obligation To Restore Ancestral Lands


    Source date (UTC): 2014-11-17 15:43:00 UTC

  • Gods exist as numbers exist and formulae exist and narratives exist

    Gods exist as numbers exist and formulae exist and narratives exist.


    Source date (UTC): 2014-11-17 15:05:00 UTC

  • Untitled

    http://captaincapitalism.blogspot.com/2014/11/undermining-private-property.html


    Source date (UTC): 2014-11-17 14:09:00 UTC

  • Men are the walls of Europa, and the points of our swords its boundaries. Words

    Men are the walls of Europa, and the points of our swords its boundaries.

    Words and laws do not freedom make.


    Source date (UTC): 2014-11-17 09:11:00 UTC

  • PROPERTARIANISM – ON ANCESTRAL LANDS (please share) CONTENTS Historical Context

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VNGiFMal9RMVIDEO: PROPERTARIANISM – ON ANCESTRAL LANDS

    (please share)

    CONTENTS

    Historical Context with Roman Skaskiw.

    Extension of Locke’s Criteria.

    The (Demanding) Criteria for Repossession of Ancestral Lands

    Fuzzy Terms Corrected: “Rights” and “Corporation”

    Government as producer of commons unavailable for privatization.

    The Obligation To Restore Ancestral Lands


    Source date (UTC): 2014-11-17 06:57:00 UTC

  • de.aristocratia –“How can one be a free man all his life? “By feeling contempt

    de.aristocratia

    –“How can one be a free man all his life? “By feeling contempt for death.”–


    Source date (UTC): 2014-11-17 05:32:00 UTC

  • de.aristocratia Moral judgement is not a question any more than mathematical for

    de.aristocratia

    Moral judgement is not a question any more than mathematical formulae are questions. Either equations balance, and proofs can be constructed or they cannot. Either fully informed, warrantied, voluntary exchange, free of externality was performed, or it was not. And in both cases, either information exists sufficient for decidability, or it does not. But no questions are undecidable.


    Source date (UTC): 2014-11-17 05:24:00 UTC